{"title":"利用图表回顾表型中的未确定病例来加强基于ehr的关联研究","authors":"Xinyao Jian , Dazheng Zhang , Zehao Yu , Hua Xu , Jiang Bian , Yonghui Wu , Jiayi Tong , Yong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In electronic health record (EHR)-based association studies, phenotyping algorithms efficiently classify patient clinical outcomes into binary categories but are susceptible to misclassification errors. The gold standard, manual chart review, involves clinicians determining the true disease status based on their assessment of health records. These clinicians-labeled phenotypes are labor-intensive and typically limited to a small subset of patients, potentially introducing a third “undecided” category when phenotypes are indeterminate. We aim to effectively integrate the algorithm-derived and chart-reviewed outcomes when both are available in EHR-based association studies.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>We propose an augmented estimation method that combines the binary algorithm-derived phenotypes for the entire cohort with the trinary chart-reviewed phenotypes for a small, selected subset. Additionally, a cost-effective outcome-dependent sampling strategy is used to address the rare disease scenarios. The proposed trinary chart-reviewed phenotype integrated cost-effective augmented estimation (TriCA) was evaluated across a wide range of simulation settings and real-world applications, including using EHR data on Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) from the OneFlorida + Clinical Research Network, and using cohort data on second breast cancer events (SBCE) from the Kaiser Permanente Washington.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to estimation based on random sampling, our augmented method improved mean square error by up to 28.3% in simulation studies; compared to estimation using only trinary chart-reviewed phenotypes, our method improved efficiency by up to 33.3% in ADRD data and 50.8% in SBCE data.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our simulation studies and real-world applications demonstrate that, compared to existing methods, the proposed method provides unbiased estimates with higher statistical efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed method effectively combined binary algorithm-derived phenotypes for the whole cohort with trinary chart-reviewed outcomes for a limited validation set, making it applicable to a broader range of applications and enhancing risk factor identification in EHR-based association studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104839"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging undecided cases in chart-reviewed phenotypes to enhance EHR-based association studies\",\"authors\":\"Xinyao Jian , Dazheng Zhang , Zehao Yu , Hua Xu , Jiang Bian , Yonghui Wu , Jiayi Tong , Yong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In electronic health record (EHR)-based association studies, phenotyping algorithms efficiently classify patient clinical outcomes into binary categories but are susceptible to misclassification errors. The gold standard, manual chart review, involves clinicians determining the true disease status based on their assessment of health records. These clinicians-labeled phenotypes are labor-intensive and typically limited to a small subset of patients, potentially introducing a third “undecided” category when phenotypes are indeterminate. We aim to effectively integrate the algorithm-derived and chart-reviewed outcomes when both are available in EHR-based association studies.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>We propose an augmented estimation method that combines the binary algorithm-derived phenotypes for the entire cohort with the trinary chart-reviewed phenotypes for a small, selected subset. Additionally, a cost-effective outcome-dependent sampling strategy is used to address the rare disease scenarios. The proposed trinary chart-reviewed phenotype integrated cost-effective augmented estimation (TriCA) was evaluated across a wide range of simulation settings and real-world applications, including using EHR data on Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) from the OneFlorida + Clinical Research Network, and using cohort data on second breast cancer events (SBCE) from the Kaiser Permanente Washington.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to estimation based on random sampling, our augmented method improved mean square error by up to 28.3% in simulation studies; compared to estimation using only trinary chart-reviewed phenotypes, our method improved efficiency by up to 33.3% in ADRD data and 50.8% in SBCE data.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our simulation studies and real-world applications demonstrate that, compared to existing methods, the proposed method provides unbiased estimates with higher statistical efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed method effectively combined binary algorithm-derived phenotypes for the whole cohort with trinary chart-reviewed outcomes for a limited validation set, making it applicable to a broader range of applications and enhancing risk factor identification in EHR-based association studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Leveraging undecided cases in chart-reviewed phenotypes to enhance EHR-based association studies
Objectives
In electronic health record (EHR)-based association studies, phenotyping algorithms efficiently classify patient clinical outcomes into binary categories but are susceptible to misclassification errors. The gold standard, manual chart review, involves clinicians determining the true disease status based on their assessment of health records. These clinicians-labeled phenotypes are labor-intensive and typically limited to a small subset of patients, potentially introducing a third “undecided” category when phenotypes are indeterminate. We aim to effectively integrate the algorithm-derived and chart-reviewed outcomes when both are available in EHR-based association studies.
Material and Methods
We propose an augmented estimation method that combines the binary algorithm-derived phenotypes for the entire cohort with the trinary chart-reviewed phenotypes for a small, selected subset. Additionally, a cost-effective outcome-dependent sampling strategy is used to address the rare disease scenarios. The proposed trinary chart-reviewed phenotype integrated cost-effective augmented estimation (TriCA) was evaluated across a wide range of simulation settings and real-world applications, including using EHR data on Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) from the OneFlorida + Clinical Research Network, and using cohort data on second breast cancer events (SBCE) from the Kaiser Permanente Washington.
Results
Compared to estimation based on random sampling, our augmented method improved mean square error by up to 28.3% in simulation studies; compared to estimation using only trinary chart-reviewed phenotypes, our method improved efficiency by up to 33.3% in ADRD data and 50.8% in SBCE data.
Discussion
Our simulation studies and real-world applications demonstrate that, compared to existing methods, the proposed method provides unbiased estimates with higher statistical efficiency.
Conclusion
The proposed method effectively combined binary algorithm-derived phenotypes for the whole cohort with trinary chart-reviewed outcomes for a limited validation set, making it applicable to a broader range of applications and enhancing risk factor identification in EHR-based association studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.