{"title":"美国南加州杀鼠饵站附近屋顶共生大鼠的行为和活动","authors":"Miles Abram Bosarge , Paul Stapp , Niamh Quinn","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The roof rat (<em>Rattus rattus</em>) is a highly invasive rat that poses a threat to humans and native species. In urban settings they are typically managed with bait stations containing chemical rodenticides, however, their behavior around bait stations is not well understood. We conducted field studies in 36 residential yards in Orange County, California, to determine whether different bait station designs or baiting approaches influence roof rat behavior around stations. Specifically, we tested whether the bait station’s design, the presence of supplemental bait, and the addition of a scent lure in the station influenced rat behavior over three separate trials. Using digital game cameras, we monitored stations containing non-toxic bait for three weeks during each trial to estimate the time to discovery, entry, bait consumption, and nightly activity of rats around stations. We also determined whether landscape characteristics associated with each yard (presence of rodent management, pets/livestock, or fruits/vegetables) influenced rat behavior. Rats were detected in most yards (75 – 91 % of yards), and they discovered stations in most of these yards (59 – 89 % stations discovered). However, they did not enter many stations (24 – 63 % stations entered). Neither the station’s design nor the addition of a scent lure in the station affected any of the measured response variables. Supplemental bait around stations decreased the time to entry and increased the nightly activity of rats at two types of stations, and increased bait consumption in all station designs. The presence of fruits and vegetables in the yard decreased the time to discovery of stations, but did not affect any other response variables. Rats in yards that were currently or recently (within last six months) managed for rodents were just as active as in unmanaged yards but were less likely to consume bait, indicating that neophobia is not the only factor contributing to bait avoidance -- previous exposure to management may also lead to bait avoidance by commensal rats. This underscores that new approaches may be needed to effectively control commensal rats with the tools currently available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 106653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavior and activity of commensal roof rats around rodenticide bait stations in southern California, USA\",\"authors\":\"Miles Abram Bosarge , Paul Stapp , Niamh Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The roof rat (<em>Rattus rattus</em>) is a highly invasive rat that poses a threat to humans and native species. In urban settings they are typically managed with bait stations containing chemical rodenticides, however, their behavior around bait stations is not well understood. We conducted field studies in 36 residential yards in Orange County, California, to determine whether different bait station designs or baiting approaches influence roof rat behavior around stations. Specifically, we tested whether the bait station’s design, the presence of supplemental bait, and the addition of a scent lure in the station influenced rat behavior over three separate trials. Using digital game cameras, we monitored stations containing non-toxic bait for three weeks during each trial to estimate the time to discovery, entry, bait consumption, and nightly activity of rats around stations. We also determined whether landscape characteristics associated with each yard (presence of rodent management, pets/livestock, or fruits/vegetables) influenced rat behavior. Rats were detected in most yards (75 – 91 % of yards), and they discovered stations in most of these yards (59 – 89 % stations discovered). However, they did not enter many stations (24 – 63 % stations entered). Neither the station’s design nor the addition of a scent lure in the station affected any of the measured response variables. Supplemental bait around stations decreased the time to entry and increased the nightly activity of rats at two types of stations, and increased bait consumption in all station designs. The presence of fruits and vegetables in the yard decreased the time to discovery of stations, but did not affect any other response variables. Rats in yards that were currently or recently (within last six months) managed for rodents were just as active as in unmanaged yards but were less likely to consume bait, indicating that neophobia is not the only factor contributing to bait avoidance -- previous exposure to management may also lead to bait avoidance by commensal rats. This underscores that new approaches may be needed to effectively control commensal rats with the tools currently available.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"287 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125001510\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125001510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Behavior and activity of commensal roof rats around rodenticide bait stations in southern California, USA
The roof rat (Rattus rattus) is a highly invasive rat that poses a threat to humans and native species. In urban settings they are typically managed with bait stations containing chemical rodenticides, however, their behavior around bait stations is not well understood. We conducted field studies in 36 residential yards in Orange County, California, to determine whether different bait station designs or baiting approaches influence roof rat behavior around stations. Specifically, we tested whether the bait station’s design, the presence of supplemental bait, and the addition of a scent lure in the station influenced rat behavior over three separate trials. Using digital game cameras, we monitored stations containing non-toxic bait for three weeks during each trial to estimate the time to discovery, entry, bait consumption, and nightly activity of rats around stations. We also determined whether landscape characteristics associated with each yard (presence of rodent management, pets/livestock, or fruits/vegetables) influenced rat behavior. Rats were detected in most yards (75 – 91 % of yards), and they discovered stations in most of these yards (59 – 89 % stations discovered). However, they did not enter many stations (24 – 63 % stations entered). Neither the station’s design nor the addition of a scent lure in the station affected any of the measured response variables. Supplemental bait around stations decreased the time to entry and increased the nightly activity of rats at two types of stations, and increased bait consumption in all station designs. The presence of fruits and vegetables in the yard decreased the time to discovery of stations, but did not affect any other response variables. Rats in yards that were currently or recently (within last six months) managed for rodents were just as active as in unmanaged yards but were less likely to consume bait, indicating that neophobia is not the only factor contributing to bait avoidance -- previous exposure to management may also lead to bait avoidance by commensal rats. This underscores that new approaches may be needed to effectively control commensal rats with the tools currently available.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals.
Topics covered include:
-Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare
-Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems
-Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation
-Methodological studies within relevant fields
The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects:
-Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals
-Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display
-Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage
-Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances
-Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements