Johannes D. Kaiser, Franziska Bräuherr, Esther A. Biesel, Sophia Chikhladze, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Dietrich A. Ruess , Uwe A. Wittel
{"title":"胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的术前预测:罗伯茨评分临界值的确定和验证","authors":"Johannes D. Kaiser, Franziska Bräuherr, Esther A. Biesel, Sophia Chikhladze, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Dietrich A. Ruess , Uwe A. Wittel","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy can be life-threatening. For risk stratification, prediction could be key. The aim of this study is to determine and validate a cut-off value for the Roberts Score, which is one of the few purely preoperative multicenter validated predictive models for POPF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>582 patients were included. The Youden index determined a cut-off in the exploratory cohort (n = 466). The validation cohort's (n = 116) ability to predict CR-POPF was tested using univariate and multivariate regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AUC of Roberts Score for the exploration cohort was 0.768. The identified cut-off of 0.268 was confirmed in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). Higher scores were significantly associated with longer time to drain removal and ICU stay. Multiple logistic regression showed the cut-off as an independent predictor of CR-POPF (p = 0.038).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The scoring variables and the cut-off itself were both independent predictors, which may improve the identification of high-risk patients and help to investigate the development of POPF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 116356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Determination and validation of a cut-off value for the Roberts Score\",\"authors\":\"Johannes D. Kaiser, Franziska Bräuherr, Esther A. Biesel, Sophia Chikhladze, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Dietrich A. Ruess , Uwe A. Wittel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy can be life-threatening. For risk stratification, prediction could be key. The aim of this study is to determine and validate a cut-off value for the Roberts Score, which is one of the few purely preoperative multicenter validated predictive models for POPF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>582 patients were included. The Youden index determined a cut-off in the exploratory cohort (n = 466). The validation cohort's (n = 116) ability to predict CR-POPF was tested using univariate and multivariate regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AUC of Roberts Score for the exploration cohort was 0.768. The identified cut-off of 0.268 was confirmed in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). Higher scores were significantly associated with longer time to drain removal and ICU stay. Multiple logistic regression showed the cut-off as an independent predictor of CR-POPF (p = 0.038).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The scoring variables and the cut-off itself were both independent predictors, which may improve the identification of high-risk patients and help to investigate the development of POPF.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"245 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001783\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001783","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preoperative prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Determination and validation of a cut-off value for the Roberts Score
Background
POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy can be life-threatening. For risk stratification, prediction could be key. The aim of this study is to determine and validate a cut-off value for the Roberts Score, which is one of the few purely preoperative multicenter validated predictive models for POPF.
Methods
582 patients were included. The Youden index determined a cut-off in the exploratory cohort (n = 466). The validation cohort's (n = 116) ability to predict CR-POPF was tested using univariate and multivariate regression analysis.
Results
AUC of Roberts Score for the exploration cohort was 0.768. The identified cut-off of 0.268 was confirmed in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). Higher scores were significantly associated with longer time to drain removal and ICU stay. Multiple logistic regression showed the cut-off as an independent predictor of CR-POPF (p = 0.038).
Conclusion
The scoring variables and the cut-off itself were both independent predictors, which may improve the identification of high-risk patients and help to investigate the development of POPF.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.