富钴斑岩矿床源自多次基性岩浆注入

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Peng-Fei Shan, Ming-Jian Cao, Dong-Mei Tang, Zheng-Jie Qiu, Noreen J. Evans, Marina Lazarov, Da-Chuan Wang, Wei Hu, Ke-Zhang Qin, Ingo Horn, Stefan Weyer
{"title":"富钴斑岩矿床源自多次基性岩浆注入","authors":"Peng-Fei Shan, Ming-Jian Cao, Dong-Mei Tang, Zheng-Jie Qiu, Noreen J. Evans, Marina Lazarov, Da-Chuan Wang, Wei Hu, Ke-Zhang Qin, Ingo Horn, Stefan Weyer","doi":"10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In addition to copper, gold, and molybdenum, porphyry deposits are important reservoirs of critical metals such as rhenium, selenium, tellurium, and platinum group elements (PGEs). However, enrichment of cobalt (Co) has received little attention. Several studies have shown that Co enrichment does occur in porphyry deposits, however, the source(s) of Co and the mechanism(s) responsible for its enrichment in the high-temperature hydrothermal systems that ultimately form Co-rich porphyry deposits, are poorly understood. In order to address this knowledge gap, we investigated the Jinchang porphyry deposit in Northeast China which is one of the most Co-enriched porphyry deposits worldwide. <ce:italic>In-situ</ce:italic> elemental and Fe-S isotopic analysis, as well as electron backscatter diffraction, have been conducted on two types of pyrite (Py1 and Py2). Py1 exhibits a core-mantle-rim structure, with Co enrichment in the core (Avg. 4.5 wt%) and rim (Avg. 7.5 wt%). Py2 displays a distinct core-rim structure, with Co enrichment only in the rim (Avg. 8.4 wt%). The early Co-rich fluid led to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 core. As pyrite continued to grow, Co in the fluid was depleted, leading to the formation of the Co-poor Py1 mantle and Py2 core. The most significant changes in δ<ce:sup loc=\"post\">56</ce:sup>Fe values and Co contents were observed between the Py2 core and Py2 rim (δ<ce:sup loc=\"post\">56</ce:sup>Fe: Δ0.94 ‰, Co: Δ10.67 wt%). This significant variation was generated by the re-injection of Co-rich fluids, which led to the coupled dissolution-reprecipitation of pyrite, leading to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 rim and Py2 rim. Each injection of Co-rich fluid not only formed a Co-rich zone in pyrite, but also precipitated Co-bearing minerals, such as siegenite and cobaltite. The magmatic δ<ce:sup loc=\"post\">34</ce:sup>S isotope signature of pyrite and chalcopyrite (1.5–5.3 ‰) rules out the possibility that Co originated from a sedimentary source. Due to the low Co content in felsic magmas, the repeated injections of Co-rich mafic magma are the only plausible source for the formation of such Co-rich fluids. Besides other possible causes, the heavy δ<ce:sup loc=\"post\">56</ce:sup>Fe<ce:inf loc=\"post\">fluid</ce:inf> values derived from mafic magmas suggest the addition of serpentinized oceanic crust slab during subduction, which directly contributed to the formation of mafic magmas.","PeriodicalId":327,"journal":{"name":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections\",\"authors\":\"Peng-Fei Shan, Ming-Jian Cao, Dong-Mei Tang, Zheng-Jie Qiu, Noreen J. Evans, Marina Lazarov, Da-Chuan Wang, Wei Hu, Ke-Zhang Qin, Ingo Horn, Stefan Weyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In addition to copper, gold, and molybdenum, porphyry deposits are important reservoirs of critical metals such as rhenium, selenium, tellurium, and platinum group elements (PGEs). However, enrichment of cobalt (Co) has received little attention. Several studies have shown that Co enrichment does occur in porphyry deposits, however, the source(s) of Co and the mechanism(s) responsible for its enrichment in the high-temperature hydrothermal systems that ultimately form Co-rich porphyry deposits, are poorly understood. In order to address this knowledge gap, we investigated the Jinchang porphyry deposit in Northeast China which is one of the most Co-enriched porphyry deposits worldwide. <ce:italic>In-situ</ce:italic> elemental and Fe-S isotopic analysis, as well as electron backscatter diffraction, have been conducted on two types of pyrite (Py1 and Py2). Py1 exhibits a core-mantle-rim structure, with Co enrichment in the core (Avg. 4.5 wt%) and rim (Avg. 7.5 wt%). Py2 displays a distinct core-rim structure, with Co enrichment only in the rim (Avg. 8.4 wt%). The early Co-rich fluid led to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 core. As pyrite continued to grow, Co in the fluid was depleted, leading to the formation of the Co-poor Py1 mantle and Py2 core. The most significant changes in δ<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">56</ce:sup>Fe values and Co contents were observed between the Py2 core and Py2 rim (δ<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">56</ce:sup>Fe: Δ0.94 ‰, Co: Δ10.67 wt%). This significant variation was generated by the re-injection of Co-rich fluids, which led to the coupled dissolution-reprecipitation of pyrite, leading to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 rim and Py2 rim. Each injection of Co-rich fluid not only formed a Co-rich zone in pyrite, but also precipitated Co-bearing minerals, such as siegenite and cobaltite. The magmatic δ<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">34</ce:sup>S isotope signature of pyrite and chalcopyrite (1.5–5.3 ‰) rules out the possibility that Co originated from a sedimentary source. Due to the low Co content in felsic magmas, the repeated injections of Co-rich mafic magma are the only plausible source for the formation of such Co-rich fluids. Besides other possible causes, the heavy δ<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">56</ce:sup>Fe<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">fluid</ce:inf> values derived from mafic magmas suggest the addition of serpentinized oceanic crust slab during subduction, which directly contributed to the formation of mafic magmas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除了铜、金、钼外,斑岩矿床还是铼、硒、碲、铂族元素等重要金属的重要储层。然而,钴(Co)的富集却很少受到关注。一些研究表明,Co富集确实发生在斑岩矿床中,然而,Co的来源和Co在最终形成富Co斑岩矿床的高温热液系统中的富集机制尚不清楚。为了解决这一知识空白,我们对全球co富集程度最高的斑岩矿床之一——东北金昌斑岩矿床进行了研究。对两种黄铁矿(Py1和Py2)进行了原位元素和Fe-S同位素分析以及电子背散射衍射。Py1表现为核-幔-环结构,Co富集于核(平均4.5 wt%)和环(平均7.5 wt%)。Py2表现出明显的核心-边缘结构,Co仅在边缘富集(平均富集量为8.4%)。早期富co流体导致富co Py1核的形成。随着黄铁矿的不断生长,流体中的Co被耗尽,形成贫Co的Py1地幔和Py2核。δ56Fe值和Co含量在Py2岩心和Py2岩缘之间变化最为显著(δ56Fe: Δ0.94‰,Co: Δ10.67 wt%)。这种显著的变化是由于富co流体的回注导致了黄铁矿的耦合溶解-再沉淀,形成了富co的Py1和Py2环。每次注入富钴流体,不仅在黄铁矿中形成富钴带,而且还析出含钴矿物,如锡长铁矿和钴矿。黄铁矿和黄铜矿的岩浆δ34S同位素特征(1.5 ~ 5.3‰)排除了Co来源于沉积的可能性。由于长英质岩浆中Co含量较低,富Co基性岩浆的反复注入是这种富Co流体形成的唯一可能来源。除其他原因外,基性岩浆的重δ56流体值表明,俯冲过程中加入了蛇纹岩化洋壳板块,直接促进了基性岩浆的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections
In addition to copper, gold, and molybdenum, porphyry deposits are important reservoirs of critical metals such as rhenium, selenium, tellurium, and platinum group elements (PGEs). However, enrichment of cobalt (Co) has received little attention. Several studies have shown that Co enrichment does occur in porphyry deposits, however, the source(s) of Co and the mechanism(s) responsible for its enrichment in the high-temperature hydrothermal systems that ultimately form Co-rich porphyry deposits, are poorly understood. In order to address this knowledge gap, we investigated the Jinchang porphyry deposit in Northeast China which is one of the most Co-enriched porphyry deposits worldwide. In-situ elemental and Fe-S isotopic analysis, as well as electron backscatter diffraction, have been conducted on two types of pyrite (Py1 and Py2). Py1 exhibits a core-mantle-rim structure, with Co enrichment in the core (Avg. 4.5 wt%) and rim (Avg. 7.5 wt%). Py2 displays a distinct core-rim structure, with Co enrichment only in the rim (Avg. 8.4 wt%). The early Co-rich fluid led to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 core. As pyrite continued to grow, Co in the fluid was depleted, leading to the formation of the Co-poor Py1 mantle and Py2 core. The most significant changes in δ56Fe values and Co contents were observed between the Py2 core and Py2 rim (δ56Fe: Δ0.94 ‰, Co: Δ10.67 wt%). This significant variation was generated by the re-injection of Co-rich fluids, which led to the coupled dissolution-reprecipitation of pyrite, leading to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 rim and Py2 rim. Each injection of Co-rich fluid not only formed a Co-rich zone in pyrite, but also precipitated Co-bearing minerals, such as siegenite and cobaltite. The magmatic δ34S isotope signature of pyrite and chalcopyrite (1.5–5.3 ‰) rules out the possibility that Co originated from a sedimentary source. Due to the low Co content in felsic magmas, the repeated injections of Co-rich mafic magma are the only plausible source for the formation of such Co-rich fluids. Besides other possible causes, the heavy δ56Fefluid values derived from mafic magmas suggest the addition of serpentinized oceanic crust slab during subduction, which directly contributed to the formation of mafic magmas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
437
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta publishes research papers in a wide range of subjects in terrestrial geochemistry, meteoritics, and planetary geochemistry. The scope of the journal includes: 1). Physical chemistry of gases, aqueous solutions, glasses, and crystalline solids 2). Igneous and metamorphic petrology 3). Chemical processes in the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and lithosphere of the Earth 4). Organic geochemistry 5). Isotope geochemistry 6). Meteoritics and meteorite impacts 7). Lunar science; and 8). Planetary geochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信