结合TSP和覆盖面积的无人机点喷路径规划

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Mogens Plessen
{"title":"结合TSP和覆盖面积的无人机点喷路径规划","authors":"Mogens Plessen","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper addresses the following task: given a set of patches or areas of varying sizes that are to be serviced within a bounding closed contour, calculate a minimal length path plan for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) such that all patches are serviced, the path additionally avoids any obstacles areas within the bounding contour and the path never leaves the bounding contour. The application in mind is agricultural spot spraying, where the bounding contour represents the field contour and multiple patches represent multiple weed areas meant to be sprayed. Obstacle areas are ponds or tree islands. The proposed method combines a heuristic solution to a traveling salesman problem (TSP) with optimised area coverage path planning. Two TSP-initialisation and 4 TSP-refinement heuristics as well as two area coverage path planning methods are evaluated on three real-world experiments with three obstacle areas and 15, 19 and 197 patches, respectively. The unsuitability of a Boustrophedon-path for area coverage gap avoidance is discussed and inclusion of a headland path for area coverage is motivated. Two main findings are (i) the particular suitability of one TSP-refinement heuristic, and (ii) the unexpected high contribution of patches areas coverage pathlengths on total pathlength, highlighting the importance of optimised area coverage path planning for spot spraying.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100965"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Path planning for spot spraying with UAVs combining TSP and area coverages\",\"authors\":\"Mogens Plessen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atech.2025.100965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper addresses the following task: given a set of patches or areas of varying sizes that are to be serviced within a bounding closed contour, calculate a minimal length path plan for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) such that all patches are serviced, the path additionally avoids any obstacles areas within the bounding contour and the path never leaves the bounding contour. The application in mind is agricultural spot spraying, where the bounding contour represents the field contour and multiple patches represent multiple weed areas meant to be sprayed. Obstacle areas are ponds or tree islands. The proposed method combines a heuristic solution to a traveling salesman problem (TSP) with optimised area coverage path planning. Two TSP-initialisation and 4 TSP-refinement heuristics as well as two area coverage path planning methods are evaluated on three real-world experiments with three obstacle areas and 15, 19 and 197 patches, respectively. The unsuitability of a Boustrophedon-path for area coverage gap avoidance is discussed and inclusion of a headland path for area coverage is motivated. Two main findings are (i) the particular suitability of one TSP-refinement heuristic, and (ii) the unexpected high contribution of patches areas coverage pathlengths on total pathlength, highlighting the importance of optimised area coverage path planning for spot spraying.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525001984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525001984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文解决了以下任务:给定一组在边界封闭轮廓内需要服务的不同大小的斑块或区域,计算无人机(UAV)的最小长度路径规划,使所有斑块都得到服务,路径另外避开边界轮廓内的任何障碍物区域,并且路径永远不会离开边界轮廓。在我的脑海中,应用是农业现场喷洒,边界轮廓表示田地轮廓,多个斑块表示要喷洒的多个杂草区域。障碍区域是池塘或树岛。该方法将旅行商问题(TSP)的启发式求解与最优区域覆盖路径规划相结合。在3个障碍物区域、15个、19个和197个斑块的3个真实世界实验中,分别对2种tsp初始化和4种tsp细化启发式方法以及2种区域覆盖路径规划方法进行了评估。本文讨论了利用海岬路径避免区域覆盖缺口的不适宜性,并提出了采用海岬路径避免区域覆盖缺口的动机。两个主要发现是:(i)一个tsp优化启发式方法的特别适用性;(ii)斑块区域覆盖路径长度对总路径长度的意外高贡献,突出了优化区域覆盖路径规划对斑点喷洒的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Path planning for spot spraying with UAVs combining TSP and area coverages

Path planning for spot spraying with UAVs combining TSP and area coverages
This paper addresses the following task: given a set of patches or areas of varying sizes that are to be serviced within a bounding closed contour, calculate a minimal length path plan for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) such that all patches are serviced, the path additionally avoids any obstacles areas within the bounding contour and the path never leaves the bounding contour. The application in mind is agricultural spot spraying, where the bounding contour represents the field contour and multiple patches represent multiple weed areas meant to be sprayed. Obstacle areas are ponds or tree islands. The proposed method combines a heuristic solution to a traveling salesman problem (TSP) with optimised area coverage path planning. Two TSP-initialisation and 4 TSP-refinement heuristics as well as two area coverage path planning methods are evaluated on three real-world experiments with three obstacle areas and 15, 19 and 197 patches, respectively. The unsuitability of a Boustrophedon-path for area coverage gap avoidance is discussed and inclusion of a headland path for area coverage is motivated. Two main findings are (i) the particular suitability of one TSP-refinement heuristic, and (ii) the unexpected high contribution of patches areas coverage pathlengths on total pathlength, highlighting the importance of optimised area coverage path planning for spot spraying.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信