{"title":"当前关于债务换自然的观点:从探索性研究转向实证研究","authors":"Christoph Nedopil , Tianshu Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Debt-for-nature swaps (DNS) have re-emerged as vital tools to address the dual challenges of sovereign debt crises and environmental degradation, gaining renewed attention post-COVID-19. Originating in the 1980s, these financial instruments now encompass broader mechanisms, including innovative participation by nontraditional creditors like China and bondholders. This review synthesizes evolving DNS scholarship into four thematic areas: structural analysis, effectiveness evaluation, political economy considerations, and scalability potential. While current studies largely focus on exploratory concepts, the article advocates for empirical research to understand DNS’s practical outcomes, barriers, and socioeconomic impacts. Multidisciplinary approaches are emphasized to explore DNS’s capacity to simultaneously enhance debt relief, conservation, and development outcomes, aligning with global sustainability goals. Future research should prioritize empirical evaluations, deeper creditor–debtor analyses, and scalable frameworks to optimize DNS as a tool for sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101538"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current perspectives on debt-for-nature swaps: moving from exploratory to empirical research\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Nedopil , Tianshu Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Debt-for-nature swaps (DNS) have re-emerged as vital tools to address the dual challenges of sovereign debt crises and environmental degradation, gaining renewed attention post-COVID-19. Originating in the 1980s, these financial instruments now encompass broader mechanisms, including innovative participation by nontraditional creditors like China and bondholders. This review synthesizes evolving DNS scholarship into four thematic areas: structural analysis, effectiveness evaluation, political economy considerations, and scalability potential. While current studies largely focus on exploratory concepts, the article advocates for empirical research to understand DNS’s practical outcomes, barriers, and socioeconomic impacts. Multidisciplinary approaches are emphasized to explore DNS’s capacity to simultaneously enhance debt relief, conservation, and development outcomes, aligning with global sustainability goals. Future research should prioritize empirical evaluations, deeper creditor–debtor analyses, and scalable frameworks to optimize DNS as a tool for sustainable development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343525000314\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343525000314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current perspectives on debt-for-nature swaps: moving from exploratory to empirical research
Debt-for-nature swaps (DNS) have re-emerged as vital tools to address the dual challenges of sovereign debt crises and environmental degradation, gaining renewed attention post-COVID-19. Originating in the 1980s, these financial instruments now encompass broader mechanisms, including innovative participation by nontraditional creditors like China and bondholders. This review synthesizes evolving DNS scholarship into four thematic areas: structural analysis, effectiveness evaluation, political economy considerations, and scalability potential. While current studies largely focus on exploratory concepts, the article advocates for empirical research to understand DNS’s practical outcomes, barriers, and socioeconomic impacts. Multidisciplinary approaches are emphasized to explore DNS’s capacity to simultaneously enhance debt relief, conservation, and development outcomes, aligning with global sustainability goals. Future research should prioritize empirical evaluations, deeper creditor–debtor analyses, and scalable frameworks to optimize DNS as a tool for sustainable development.
期刊介绍:
"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.