临床遗传学中LGBTQ+个体的患者护理实践:范围审查

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Kimberly Zayhowski, Kayla Horowitz, Molly Bostrom, Kathleen F. Mittendorf, Megan Kocher, Jehannine (J9) Austin, Ian M. MacFarlane
{"title":"临床遗传学中LGBTQ+个体的患者护理实践:范围审查","authors":"Kimberly Zayhowski,&nbsp;Kayla Horowitz,&nbsp;Molly Bostrom,&nbsp;Kathleen F. Mittendorf,&nbsp;Megan Kocher,&nbsp;Jehannine (J9) Austin,&nbsp;Ian M. MacFarlane","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals who are LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, and/or have a sexual orientations and/or gender identity beyond cisheteronormative conceptions) face systemic barriers to healthcare, leading to significant health inequities. To address these challenges, genetic providers must better understand and inclusively address LGBTQ+ patient needs. This scoping review aims to map the current landscape of genetic care practices and their inclusivity toward LGBTQ+ individuals. We conducted a systematic search of databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, identifying 65 relevant articles focused on LGBTQ+ patient experiences and care practices within genetic healthcare services. Our thematic analysis of the articles highlights three major themes: exclusionary clinical environments and tools, provider biases and educational needs, and patient-reported barriers in accessing genetic services. Many articles underscored the importance of inclusive language and criticized the conflation of sex, sex chromosomes, and gender. A significant focus was on cancer care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals, revealing a need for more data on the effects of gender-affirming care on cancer risk assessment. Moreover, genetic counselors often report insufficient training in LGBTQ+ health needs, contributing to biases and knowledge gaps. Despite increased awareness among providers of the need for inclusive care, LGBTQ+ patients encounter substantial barriers, including medical distrust and limited family health history, which may deter them from disclosing their identities due to the risk of discrimination. This review calls for standardized data collection practices regarding sex-related variables, gender modality, and sexual orientation, alongside specialized training programs for providers. By emphasizing critical areas for research, policy changes, and education, we aim to promote equitable, patient-centered genetic services for LGBTQ+ communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient care practices for LGBTQ+ individuals in clinical genetics: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Zayhowski,&nbsp;Kayla Horowitz,&nbsp;Molly Bostrom,&nbsp;Kathleen F. Mittendorf,&nbsp;Megan Kocher,&nbsp;Jehannine (J9) Austin,&nbsp;Ian M. MacFarlane\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Individuals who are LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, and/or have a sexual orientations and/or gender identity beyond cisheteronormative conceptions) face systemic barriers to healthcare, leading to significant health inequities. To address these challenges, genetic providers must better understand and inclusively address LGBTQ+ patient needs. This scoping review aims to map the current landscape of genetic care practices and their inclusivity toward LGBTQ+ individuals. We conducted a systematic search of databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, identifying 65 relevant articles focused on LGBTQ+ patient experiences and care practices within genetic healthcare services. Our thematic analysis of the articles highlights three major themes: exclusionary clinical environments and tools, provider biases and educational needs, and patient-reported barriers in accessing genetic services. Many articles underscored the importance of inclusive language and criticized the conflation of sex, sex chromosomes, and gender. A significant focus was on cancer care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals, revealing a need for more data on the effects of gender-affirming care on cancer risk assessment. Moreover, genetic counselors often report insufficient training in LGBTQ+ health needs, contributing to biases and knowledge gaps. Despite increased awareness among providers of the need for inclusive care, LGBTQ+ patients encounter substantial barriers, including medical distrust and limited family health history, which may deter them from disclosing their identities due to the risk of discrimination. This review calls for standardized data collection practices regarding sex-related variables, gender modality, and sexual orientation, alongside specialized training programs for providers. By emphasizing critical areas for research, policy changes, and education, we aim to promote equitable, patient-centered genetic services for LGBTQ+ communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

LGBTQ+(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者和/或性取向和/或性别认同超出异性恋规范概念)的个体在医疗保健方面面临系统性障碍,导致严重的卫生不平等。为了应对这些挑战,基因提供者必须更好地理解并包容地解决LGBTQ+患者的需求。这一范围审查旨在绘制遗传护理实践的当前景观及其对LGBTQ+个体的包容性。我们对数据库进行了系统搜索,包括Ovid MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Web of Science,确定了65篇有关LGBTQ+患者经历和遗传医疗服务护理实践的相关文章。我们对文章的专题分析突出了三个主要主题:排他的临床环境和工具,提供者偏见和教育需求,以及患者报告的获得遗传服务的障碍。许多文章强调了包容性语言的重要性,并批评了将性、性染色体和性别混为一谈的做法。一个重要的重点是对跨性别者和性别多样化个体的癌症护理,这表明需要更多关于性别肯定护理对癌症风险评估影响的数据。此外,遗传咨询师经常报告LGBTQ+健康需求方面的培训不足,导致偏见和知识差距。尽管提供者越来越意识到需要包容性护理,但LGBTQ+患者遇到了很大的障碍,包括医疗不信任和有限的家庭健康史,这可能会阻止他们透露自己的身份,因为有受到歧视的风险。这篇综述呼吁对与性别相关的变量、性别形态和性取向进行标准化的数据收集实践,并为提供者提供专门的培训计划。通过强调研究、政策变化和教育的关键领域,我们旨在促进LGBTQ+社区公平、以患者为中心的遗传服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient care practices for LGBTQ+ individuals in clinical genetics: A scoping review

Patient care practices for LGBTQ+ individuals in clinical genetics: A scoping review

Individuals who are LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, and/or have a sexual orientations and/or gender identity beyond cisheteronormative conceptions) face systemic barriers to healthcare, leading to significant health inequities. To address these challenges, genetic providers must better understand and inclusively address LGBTQ+ patient needs. This scoping review aims to map the current landscape of genetic care practices and their inclusivity toward LGBTQ+ individuals. We conducted a systematic search of databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, identifying 65 relevant articles focused on LGBTQ+ patient experiences and care practices within genetic healthcare services. Our thematic analysis of the articles highlights three major themes: exclusionary clinical environments and tools, provider biases and educational needs, and patient-reported barriers in accessing genetic services. Many articles underscored the importance of inclusive language and criticized the conflation of sex, sex chromosomes, and gender. A significant focus was on cancer care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals, revealing a need for more data on the effects of gender-affirming care on cancer risk assessment. Moreover, genetic counselors often report insufficient training in LGBTQ+ health needs, contributing to biases and knowledge gaps. Despite increased awareness among providers of the need for inclusive care, LGBTQ+ patients encounter substantial barriers, including medical distrust and limited family health history, which may deter them from disclosing their identities due to the risk of discrimination. This review calls for standardized data collection practices regarding sex-related variables, gender modality, and sexual orientation, alongside specialized training programs for providers. By emphasizing critical areas for research, policy changes, and education, we aim to promote equitable, patient-centered genetic services for LGBTQ+ communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信