女性在哪里:计算机领域的性别失衡和教师对理论和应用研究的看法

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Samantha Kleinberg;Jessecae K. Marsh
{"title":"女性在哪里:计算机领域的性别失衡和教师对理论和应用研究的看法","authors":"Samantha Kleinberg;Jessecae K. Marsh","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3564170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women remain under-represented in academic science, and this is especially true in computing. While there is limited research on gender differences in research focus, there is evidence that women may be more likely to conduct applied research. We surveyed tenured and tenure-track faculty in the United States to understand perceptions of hypothetical researchers who engage in applied or theoretical work. Faculty rated researchers engaged in applied research as less likely to publish their work, receive tenure/be promoted, obtain awards, and get funding for their work. Faculty further rated these researchers as less brilliant, creative, and technically skilled than they rated their theory-focused counterparts. Data from publications, hiring, funding, and awards suggests that applied research may indeed lead to worse career outcomes. We further show that women are more highly represented in applied research areas than theoretical ones. Negative perceptions of applied researchers must now be addressed to avoid exacerbating the gender gap.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"73520-73529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10975775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where the Women Are: Gender Imbalance in Computing and Faculty Perceptions of Theoretical and Applied Research\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Kleinberg;Jessecae K. Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3564170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Women remain under-represented in academic science, and this is especially true in computing. While there is limited research on gender differences in research focus, there is evidence that women may be more likely to conduct applied research. We surveyed tenured and tenure-track faculty in the United States to understand perceptions of hypothetical researchers who engage in applied or theoretical work. Faculty rated researchers engaged in applied research as less likely to publish their work, receive tenure/be promoted, obtain awards, and get funding for their work. Faculty further rated these researchers as less brilliant, creative, and technically skilled than they rated their theory-focused counterparts. Data from publications, hiring, funding, and awards suggests that applied research may indeed lead to worse career outcomes. We further show that women are more highly represented in applied research areas than theoretical ones. Negative perceptions of applied researchers must now be addressed to avoid exacerbating the gender gap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Access\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"73520-73529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10975775\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10975775/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10975775/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

女性在学术科学领域的代表性仍然不足,在计算机领域尤其如此。虽然关于研究重点的性别差异的研究有限,但有证据表明,女性可能更有可能进行应用研究。我们调查了美国的终身教职和终身教职教师,以了解从事应用或理论工作的假设研究人员的看法。教师们认为从事应用研究的研究人员不太可能发表他们的研究成果,获得终身职位/晋升,获得奖励,并为他们的工作获得资助。教师们进一步认为,这些研究人员不如那些专注于理论的同行聪明、有创造力、技术娴熟。来自出版物、招聘、资助和奖励的数据表明,应用研究确实可能导致更糟糕的职业结果。我们进一步表明,女性在应用研究领域的比例高于理论研究领域。现在必须解决对应用研究人员的负面看法,以避免加剧性别差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where the Women Are: Gender Imbalance in Computing and Faculty Perceptions of Theoretical and Applied Research
Women remain under-represented in academic science, and this is especially true in computing. While there is limited research on gender differences in research focus, there is evidence that women may be more likely to conduct applied research. We surveyed tenured and tenure-track faculty in the United States to understand perceptions of hypothetical researchers who engage in applied or theoretical work. Faculty rated researchers engaged in applied research as less likely to publish their work, receive tenure/be promoted, obtain awards, and get funding for their work. Faculty further rated these researchers as less brilliant, creative, and technically skilled than they rated their theory-focused counterparts. Data from publications, hiring, funding, and awards suggests that applied research may indeed lead to worse career outcomes. We further show that women are more highly represented in applied research areas than theoretical ones. Negative perceptions of applied researchers must now be addressed to avoid exacerbating the gender gap.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信