Grace-Ann Fasaye, Kathleen Calzone, Elise Travis, Amber F. Gallanis, Lauren Gamble, Jeremy L. Davis
{"title":"先证者特征与高危亲属CDH1级联基因检测摄取的关系","authors":"Grace-Ann Fasaye, Kathleen Calzone, Elise Travis, Amber F. Gallanis, Lauren Gamble, Jeremy L. Davis","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cascade genetic testing involves testing at-risk relatives for a gene variant identified in the family to tailor clinical management. The first person in a family identified with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is the proband. We aimed to determine proband characteristics associated with cascade testing for the <i>CDH1</i> gastric and breast cancer susceptibility gene. Cascade genetic testing proportions in 100 <i>CDH1</i> families were analyzed. Overall, 57% (248/427) of proband's first-degree relatives (FDR) and 31% (135/436) of second-degree relatives (SDR) underwent testing. Proband characteristics associated with higher mean proportions of genetic testing in FDR included male sex (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and personal history of gastric cancer (<i>p</i> = 0.05). A difference was also detected in mean uptake proportions by proband's race/ethnicity. White probands had higher mean proportions of SDR tested (40%) compared to Asian (9%, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and Black (5%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) probands. Testing proportions in FDR and SDR increased with the length of time from proband's <i>CDH1</i> diagnosis (FDR <i>p</i> < 0.001, SDR <i>p</i> = 0.002). Age when proband was tested, personal history of breast cancer, and variant in another cancer gene did not influence testing uptake in FDR and SDR. Proband characteristics associated with higher <i>CDH1</i> cascade genetic testing proportions include male sex, White race/ethnicity, and a personal history of gastric cancer. Probands who are female, Asian, Black, and those without a personal history of gastric cancer may require tailored support facilitating <i>CDH1</i> cascade testing in at-risk relatives. Additional studies are needed to gain a deeper understanding of how proband characteristics influence the uptake of cascade genetic testing for cancer risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between proband characteristics and CDH1 cascade genetic testing uptake in at-risk relatives\",\"authors\":\"Grace-Ann Fasaye, Kathleen Calzone, Elise Travis, Amber F. Gallanis, Lauren Gamble, Jeremy L. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cascade genetic testing involves testing at-risk relatives for a gene variant identified in the family to tailor clinical management. The first person in a family identified with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is the proband. We aimed to determine proband characteristics associated with cascade testing for the <i>CDH1</i> gastric and breast cancer susceptibility gene. Cascade genetic testing proportions in 100 <i>CDH1</i> families were analyzed. Overall, 57% (248/427) of proband's first-degree relatives (FDR) and 31% (135/436) of second-degree relatives (SDR) underwent testing. Proband characteristics associated with higher mean proportions of genetic testing in FDR included male sex (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and personal history of gastric cancer (<i>p</i> = 0.05). A difference was also detected in mean uptake proportions by proband's race/ethnicity. White probands had higher mean proportions of SDR tested (40%) compared to Asian (9%, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and Black (5%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) probands. Testing proportions in FDR and SDR increased with the length of time from proband's <i>CDH1</i> diagnosis (FDR <i>p</i> < 0.001, SDR <i>p</i> = 0.002). Age when proband was tested, personal history of breast cancer, and variant in another cancer gene did not influence testing uptake in FDR and SDR. Proband characteristics associated with higher <i>CDH1</i> cascade genetic testing proportions include male sex, White race/ethnicity, and a personal history of gastric cancer. Probands who are female, Asian, Black, and those without a personal history of gastric cancer may require tailored support facilitating <i>CDH1</i> cascade testing in at-risk relatives. Additional studies are needed to gain a deeper understanding of how proband characteristics influence the uptake of cascade genetic testing for cancer risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
级联基因检测包括检测在家族中发现的基因变异的高危亲属,以定制临床管理。在一个家庭中,第一个被确定具有致病性或可能致病性变异的人是先证者。我们的目的是确定与CDH1胃癌和乳腺癌易感基因级联检测相关的先证者特征。分析了100个CDH1家族的级联基因检测比例。总体而言,57%(248/427)的先证者一级亲属(FDR)和31%(135/436)的二级亲属(SDR)接受了检测。与FDR中较高的平均基因检测比例相关的先证者特征包括男性(p = 0.03)和个人胃癌史(p = 0.05)。先证者种族/民族的平均摄取比例也存在差异。与亚洲人(9%,p = 0.02)和黑人(5%,p = 0.001)相比,白人先知者的SDR测试平均比例(40%)更高。FDR和SDR的检测比例随着先证者CDH1诊断时间的延长而增加(FDR p < 0.001, SDR p = 0.002)。先证者接受检测时的年龄、乳腺癌的个人病史和其他癌症基因的变异对FDR和SDR的检测吸收没有影响。与较高的CDH1级联基因检测比例相关的先证者特征包括男性、白人种族/民族和个人胃癌史。女性、亚洲人、黑人和没有个人胃癌史的先证者可能需要量身定制的支持,以便在高危亲属中进行CDH1级联检测。需要进一步的研究来更深入地了解先证者特征如何影响癌症风险级联基因检测的接受。
Association between proband characteristics and CDH1 cascade genetic testing uptake in at-risk relatives
Cascade genetic testing involves testing at-risk relatives for a gene variant identified in the family to tailor clinical management. The first person in a family identified with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is the proband. We aimed to determine proband characteristics associated with cascade testing for the CDH1 gastric and breast cancer susceptibility gene. Cascade genetic testing proportions in 100 CDH1 families were analyzed. Overall, 57% (248/427) of proband's first-degree relatives (FDR) and 31% (135/436) of second-degree relatives (SDR) underwent testing. Proband characteristics associated with higher mean proportions of genetic testing in FDR included male sex (p = 0.03) and personal history of gastric cancer (p = 0.05). A difference was also detected in mean uptake proportions by proband's race/ethnicity. White probands had higher mean proportions of SDR tested (40%) compared to Asian (9%, p = 0.02) and Black (5%, p = 0.001) probands. Testing proportions in FDR and SDR increased with the length of time from proband's CDH1 diagnosis (FDR p < 0.001, SDR p = 0.002). Age when proband was tested, personal history of breast cancer, and variant in another cancer gene did not influence testing uptake in FDR and SDR. Proband characteristics associated with higher CDH1 cascade genetic testing proportions include male sex, White race/ethnicity, and a personal history of gastric cancer. Probands who are female, Asian, Black, and those without a personal history of gastric cancer may require tailored support facilitating CDH1 cascade testing in at-risk relatives. Additional studies are needed to gain a deeper understanding of how proband characteristics influence the uptake of cascade genetic testing for cancer risk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.