语言失调对遗传咨询师与患者建立工作联盟能力的影响

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Anna Burton, Dana Schlegel, Charité Ricker, Beverly M. Yashar
{"title":"语言失调对遗传咨询师与患者建立工作联盟能力的影响","authors":"Anna Burton,&nbsp;Dana Schlegel,&nbsp;Charité Ricker,&nbsp;Beverly M. Yashar","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We explored the impact of language discordance (LD) on quality of care by asking genetic counselors (GCs) about their perception of how their lack of proficiency in a patient's language affects their sessions. We hypothesized that contracting, which relies on ongoing, bidirectional communication between GC and patient, is particularly vulnerable to LD. Specifically, we evaluated the impact of dialogue engagement (whether GCs ranked dialogue as more one-sided/rigid or more interactive/conversational), time sufficiency (how adequate the GCs ranked the time allotted for the session), and interpreter-related factors (experience and relationship with interpreters; perceived ability and knowledge of how to work with interpreters) on GCs' perceived ability to contract in LD sessions. Forty-five GCs recruited from the NSGC listserv completed a 42-item survey exploring these topics through reflection on their most recent LD and language concordant (LC) sessions. The outcome measure of “perceived contracting success” was defined based on five practice-based competencies. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed ranks tests and linear regressions and found that GCs' perceived (1) contracting success, (2) dialogue engagement, and (3) time sufficiency were significantly lower in LD sessions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 for all 3). Perceived contracting success in LD sessions had a positive relationship with both perceived dialogue engagement and perceived time sufficiency (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.312, 0.103). Also, perceived dialogue engagement increased with higher perceived time sufficiency and trust in the interpreter (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.235, 0.27). Our study is the first to quantitatively explore factors impacting perceived contracting success in LD GC sessions and suggests that LD may hinder communication and session tailoring. This highlights the importance of GCs being more intentional about having interactive dialogue with patients in LD sessions, considering allotting more time for LD sessions, and meeting with the interpreter prior to LD sessions to establish a trusting relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of language discordance on genetic counselors' ability to establish a working alliance with patients\",\"authors\":\"Anna Burton,&nbsp;Dana Schlegel,&nbsp;Charité Ricker,&nbsp;Beverly M. Yashar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We explored the impact of language discordance (LD) on quality of care by asking genetic counselors (GCs) about their perception of how their lack of proficiency in a patient's language affects their sessions. We hypothesized that contracting, which relies on ongoing, bidirectional communication between GC and patient, is particularly vulnerable to LD. Specifically, we evaluated the impact of dialogue engagement (whether GCs ranked dialogue as more one-sided/rigid or more interactive/conversational), time sufficiency (how adequate the GCs ranked the time allotted for the session), and interpreter-related factors (experience and relationship with interpreters; perceived ability and knowledge of how to work with interpreters) on GCs' perceived ability to contract in LD sessions. Forty-five GCs recruited from the NSGC listserv completed a 42-item survey exploring these topics through reflection on their most recent LD and language concordant (LC) sessions. The outcome measure of “perceived contracting success” was defined based on five practice-based competencies. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed ranks tests and linear regressions and found that GCs' perceived (1) contracting success, (2) dialogue engagement, and (3) time sufficiency were significantly lower in LD sessions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 for all 3). Perceived contracting success in LD sessions had a positive relationship with both perceived dialogue engagement and perceived time sufficiency (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.312, 0.103). Also, perceived dialogue engagement increased with higher perceived time sufficiency and trust in the interpreter (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.235, 0.27). Our study is the first to quantitatively explore factors impacting perceived contracting success in LD GC sessions and suggests that LD may hinder communication and session tailoring. This highlights the importance of GCs being more intentional about having interactive dialogue with patients in LD sessions, considering allotting more time for LD sessions, and meeting with the interpreter prior to LD sessions to establish a trusting relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们探讨了语言失调(LD)对护理质量的影响,通过询问遗传咨询师(GCs)关于他们对患者语言熟练程度的缺乏如何影响他们的会话的看法。我们假设契约依赖于GC和患者之间持续的双向沟通,特别容易受到LD的影响。具体而言,我们评估了对话参与的影响(GC是否将对话评为更片面/僵化或更互动/对话),时间充分性(GC对会话分配的时间进行了适当的排名),以及与口译员相关的因素(经验和与口译员的关系;感知能力和如何与口译员合作的知识)对GCs在LD会议中收缩的感知能力的影响。从国家科学资助委员会名单服务中招募的45位语言协调人完成了一项42项的调查,通过反思他们最近的学习和语言协调(LC)会议,探讨了这些主题。“感知承包成功”的结果度量是基于五个基于实践的能力来定义的。使用Wilcoxon签名秩检验和线性回归对结果进行分析,发现GCs的感知(1)签约成功,(2)对话参与和(3)时间充足性在LD会话中显着降低(p < 0.001)。学习会话的感知签约成功与感知对话参与和感知时间充分性呈正相关(r2 = 0.312, 0.103)。此外,感知到的对话参与随着感知到的时间充分性和对口译员的信任程度的提高而增加(r2 = 0.235, 0.27)。我们的研究首次定量探讨了影响LD GC会话感知承包成功的因素,并表明LD可能阻碍沟通和会话定制。这突出了GCs在LD会议中更有意地与患者进行互动对话的重要性,考虑为LD会议分配更多的时间,并在LD会议之前与口译员会面,以建立信任关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of language discordance on genetic counselors' ability to establish a working alliance with patients

The impact of language discordance on genetic counselors' ability to establish a working alliance with patients

We explored the impact of language discordance (LD) on quality of care by asking genetic counselors (GCs) about their perception of how their lack of proficiency in a patient's language affects their sessions. We hypothesized that contracting, which relies on ongoing, bidirectional communication between GC and patient, is particularly vulnerable to LD. Specifically, we evaluated the impact of dialogue engagement (whether GCs ranked dialogue as more one-sided/rigid or more interactive/conversational), time sufficiency (how adequate the GCs ranked the time allotted for the session), and interpreter-related factors (experience and relationship with interpreters; perceived ability and knowledge of how to work with interpreters) on GCs' perceived ability to contract in LD sessions. Forty-five GCs recruited from the NSGC listserv completed a 42-item survey exploring these topics through reflection on their most recent LD and language concordant (LC) sessions. The outcome measure of “perceived contracting success” was defined based on five practice-based competencies. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed ranks tests and linear regressions and found that GCs' perceived (1) contracting success, (2) dialogue engagement, and (3) time sufficiency were significantly lower in LD sessions (p < 0.001 for all 3). Perceived contracting success in LD sessions had a positive relationship with both perceived dialogue engagement and perceived time sufficiency (r2 = 0.312, 0.103). Also, perceived dialogue engagement increased with higher perceived time sufficiency and trust in the interpreter (r2 = 0.235, 0.27). Our study is the first to quantitatively explore factors impacting perceived contracting success in LD GC sessions and suggests that LD may hinder communication and session tailoring. This highlights the importance of GCs being more intentional about having interactive dialogue with patients in LD sessions, considering allotting more time for LD sessions, and meeting with the interpreter prior to LD sessions to establish a trusting relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信