在产前遗传咨询设置中,从家庭谱系中报告的癌症频率的种族差异

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Alex Palacios, Pamela Flodman, Kathryn Steinhaus French, Moyra Smith, Fabiola Quintero-Rivera
{"title":"在产前遗传咨询设置中,从家庭谱系中报告的癌症频率的种族差异","authors":"Alex Palacios,&nbsp;Pamela Flodman,&nbsp;Kathryn Steinhaus French,&nbsp;Moyra Smith,&nbsp;Fabiola Quintero-Rivera","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study analyzed whether differences in cancer reporting exist between different ethno-racial groups in pedigrees from a prenatal <i>genetic counseling</i> setting. Data were collected from 446 charts at University of California, Irvine from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2020. A total of 795 pedigrees meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed from four ethno-racial groups: White, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, and African American/Black. The total number of first- and second-degree relatives affected with cancer was analyzed using contingency tables, nonparametric tests, and Poisson regression. Cancer reporting in first- and second-degree relatives was highest among the White group and lower in the Latinx, Asian, and Black groups. Ethno-racial group, presence or absence of the prospective father, and medical interpreter use were significant factors in predicting the number of relatives reported to have cancer in a Poisson regression model. Controlling for the total number of relatives in the pedigree, cancer reporting rates for the Latinx, Black, and Asian groups were 36.3%, 50.2%, and 65.5%, respectively, of that in the White pedigrees. Cancer reporting rates observed in Asian pedigrees (in comparison to White pedigrees) were similar to the rates reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but reporting in the Latinx and Black pedigrees was less than would be expected based on population incidence. This suggests that cancer histories in some people of color (POC) may be truncated. Healthcare professionals should recognize that certain patient populations may have limited knowledge of their family cancer history, or that such information may not be disclosed due to nuances of cultural differences or possible provider bias. In order to provide appropriate <i>risk assessment</i>, <i>interventions</i> addressing structural barriers should be undertaken in prenatal clinics to reduce existing health <i>disparities</i> and improve health outcomes in POC, since this may be the only opportunity to obtain a comprehensive family health history.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethno-racial differences in the frequency of cancer reported from family pedigrees in the prenatal genetic counseling setting\",\"authors\":\"Alex Palacios,&nbsp;Pamela Flodman,&nbsp;Kathryn Steinhaus French,&nbsp;Moyra Smith,&nbsp;Fabiola Quintero-Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study analyzed whether differences in cancer reporting exist between different ethno-racial groups in pedigrees from a prenatal <i>genetic counseling</i> setting. Data were collected from 446 charts at University of California, Irvine from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2020. A total of 795 pedigrees meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed from four ethno-racial groups: White, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, and African American/Black. The total number of first- and second-degree relatives affected with cancer was analyzed using contingency tables, nonparametric tests, and Poisson regression. Cancer reporting in first- and second-degree relatives was highest among the White group and lower in the Latinx, Asian, and Black groups. Ethno-racial group, presence or absence of the prospective father, and medical interpreter use were significant factors in predicting the number of relatives reported to have cancer in a Poisson regression model. Controlling for the total number of relatives in the pedigree, cancer reporting rates for the Latinx, Black, and Asian groups were 36.3%, 50.2%, and 65.5%, respectively, of that in the White pedigrees. Cancer reporting rates observed in Asian pedigrees (in comparison to White pedigrees) were similar to the rates reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but reporting in the Latinx and Black pedigrees was less than would be expected based on population incidence. This suggests that cancer histories in some people of color (POC) may be truncated. Healthcare professionals should recognize that certain patient populations may have limited knowledge of their family cancer history, or that such information may not be disclosed due to nuances of cultural differences or possible provider bias. In order to provide appropriate <i>risk assessment</i>, <i>interventions</i> addressing structural barriers should be undertaken in prenatal clinics to reduce existing health <i>disparities</i> and improve health outcomes in POC, since this may be the only opportunity to obtain a comprehensive family health history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70038\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究从产前遗传咨询的角度分析了不同人种的家系之间是否存在癌症报告的差异。数据收集自加州大学欧文分校2015年1月1日至2020年8月31日的446张图表。共分析了795个符合纳入标准的家系,来自四个种族群体:白人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、亚洲人和非裔美国人/黑人。采用列联表、非参数检验和泊松回归分析罹患癌症的一级和二级亲属总数。第一和第二亲属的癌症报告在白人组中最高,在拉丁裔、亚裔和黑人组中较低。在泊松回归模型中,人种、准父亲的存在与否和医疗口译员的使用是预测报告患有癌症的亲属数量的重要因素。控制家系中亲属总数,拉丁裔、黑人和亚洲人的癌症报告率分别为白人家系的36.3%、50.2%和65.5%。在亚洲血统中观察到的癌症报告率(与白人血统相比)与疾病控制和预防中心报告的比率相似,但在拉丁裔和黑人血统中报告的比率低于基于人口发病率的预期。这表明一些有色人种(POC)的癌症病史可能被截断。医疗保健专业人员应该认识到,某些患者群体对其家族癌症病史的了解可能有限,或者由于文化差异的细微差别或可能的提供者偏见,这些信息可能不会被披露。为了提供适当的风险评估,应在产前诊所采取解决结构性障碍的干预措施,以减少现有的健康差距,改善POC的健康结果,因为这可能是获得全面家庭健康史的唯一机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ethno-racial differences in the frequency of cancer reported from family pedigrees in the prenatal genetic counseling setting

Ethno-racial differences in the frequency of cancer reported from family pedigrees in the prenatal genetic counseling setting

This study analyzed whether differences in cancer reporting exist between different ethno-racial groups in pedigrees from a prenatal genetic counseling setting. Data were collected from 446 charts at University of California, Irvine from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2020. A total of 795 pedigrees meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed from four ethno-racial groups: White, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, and African American/Black. The total number of first- and second-degree relatives affected with cancer was analyzed using contingency tables, nonparametric tests, and Poisson regression. Cancer reporting in first- and second-degree relatives was highest among the White group and lower in the Latinx, Asian, and Black groups. Ethno-racial group, presence or absence of the prospective father, and medical interpreter use were significant factors in predicting the number of relatives reported to have cancer in a Poisson regression model. Controlling for the total number of relatives in the pedigree, cancer reporting rates for the Latinx, Black, and Asian groups were 36.3%, 50.2%, and 65.5%, respectively, of that in the White pedigrees. Cancer reporting rates observed in Asian pedigrees (in comparison to White pedigrees) were similar to the rates reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but reporting in the Latinx and Black pedigrees was less than would be expected based on population incidence. This suggests that cancer histories in some people of color (POC) may be truncated. Healthcare professionals should recognize that certain patient populations may have limited knowledge of their family cancer history, or that such information may not be disclosed due to nuances of cultural differences or possible provider bias. In order to provide appropriate risk assessment, interventions addressing structural barriers should be undertaken in prenatal clinics to reduce existing health disparities and improve health outcomes in POC, since this may be the only opportunity to obtain a comprehensive family health history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信