计算机中介反馈的处理:一项眼动追踪研究

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nektaria-Efstathia Kourtali, Ziwei Guo
{"title":"计算机中介反馈的处理:一项眼动追踪研究","authors":"Nektaria-Efstathia Kourtali,&nbsp;Ziwei Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study explored the extent to which the linguistic focus of interactional feedback influences levels of L2 learners' attention to target features when feedback is supplied in the form of recasts during written synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC). The participants, 28 university students who were L1 Mandarin – L2 users of English (IELTS 6.5), were asked to provide information about the plot of a silent Charlie Chaplin film in the chat in Zoom. Interrogative, incidental recasts were provided by the researcher targeting lexical, morphological and syntactic features. In order to capture participants' attentional processes while reading the feedback, we used eye-tracking methodology and we employed Weblink software to generate measures showing number and length of fixations, duration of first fixation, and number of times learners returned to a target feature (interest area). For triangulation, we also conducted stimulated recall interviews so as to gain information about learners’ levels of noticing of target language areas. Both eye-tracking and stimulated recall interviews demonstrated greater levels of attention to lexical recasts than morphological and syntactic ones. In particular, lexical recasts led to more and longer fixations, and more returns to target features. The stimulated recall comments support this finding. Learners noticed target areas when lexical recasts were provided; whereas they perceived the majority of morphological and syntactic recasts as clarification requests or confirmation checks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Processing of computer-mediated feedback: An eye-tracking study\",\"authors\":\"Nektaria-Efstathia Kourtali,&nbsp;Ziwei Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2025.103690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current study explored the extent to which the linguistic focus of interactional feedback influences levels of L2 learners' attention to target features when feedback is supplied in the form of recasts during written synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC). The participants, 28 university students who were L1 Mandarin – L2 users of English (IELTS 6.5), were asked to provide information about the plot of a silent Charlie Chaplin film in the chat in Zoom. Interrogative, incidental recasts were provided by the researcher targeting lexical, morphological and syntactic features. In order to capture participants' attentional processes while reading the feedback, we used eye-tracking methodology and we employed Weblink software to generate measures showing number and length of fixations, duration of first fixation, and number of times learners returned to a target feature (interest area). For triangulation, we also conducted stimulated recall interviews so as to gain information about learners’ levels of noticing of target language areas. Both eye-tracking and stimulated recall interviews demonstrated greater levels of attention to lexical recasts than morphological and syntactic ones. In particular, lexical recasts led to more and longer fixations, and more returns to target features. The stimulated recall comments support this finding. Learners noticed target areas when lexical recasts were provided; whereas they perceived the majority of morphological and syntactic recasts as clarification requests or confirmation checks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001009\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在书面同步计算机媒介交流(SCMC)中,当反馈以重铸的形式提供时,交互反馈的语言焦点在多大程度上影响了二语学习者对目标特征的注意水平。参与者是28名大学学生,他们的母语是普通话,第二语言是英语(雅思6.5),他们被要求在Zoom聊天中提供关于查理·卓别林无声电影情节的信息。研究者针对词汇、形态和句法特征,提供了疑问句和附带重铸。为了捕捉参与者在阅读反馈时的注意力过程,我们使用了眼动追踪方法,并使用webblink软件生成测量结果,显示注视的次数和长度、第一次注视的持续时间以及学习者返回目标特征(兴趣区域)的次数。为了进行三角测量,我们还进行了刺激回忆访谈,以获得学习者对目标语言区域的注意水平的信息。眼动追踪和刺激回忆访谈都表明,词汇重铸比形态重铸和句法重铸更受关注。特别是,词汇重铸导致更多更长时间的固定,更多的返回到目标特征。受刺激的回忆评论支持这一发现。当提供词汇重铸时,学习者注意到目标区域;然而,他们认为大多数形态和句法的重铸是澄清要求或确认检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Processing of computer-mediated feedback: An eye-tracking study
The current study explored the extent to which the linguistic focus of interactional feedback influences levels of L2 learners' attention to target features when feedback is supplied in the form of recasts during written synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC). The participants, 28 university students who were L1 Mandarin – L2 users of English (IELTS 6.5), were asked to provide information about the plot of a silent Charlie Chaplin film in the chat in Zoom. Interrogative, incidental recasts were provided by the researcher targeting lexical, morphological and syntactic features. In order to capture participants' attentional processes while reading the feedback, we used eye-tracking methodology and we employed Weblink software to generate measures showing number and length of fixations, duration of first fixation, and number of times learners returned to a target feature (interest area). For triangulation, we also conducted stimulated recall interviews so as to gain information about learners’ levels of noticing of target language areas. Both eye-tracking and stimulated recall interviews demonstrated greater levels of attention to lexical recasts than morphological and syntactic ones. In particular, lexical recasts led to more and longer fixations, and more returns to target features. The stimulated recall comments support this finding. Learners noticed target areas when lexical recasts were provided; whereas they perceived the majority of morphological and syntactic recasts as clarification requests or confirmation checks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信