基于点云测量和梯度增强回归树的铝-钢磁脉冲卷曲接头疲劳寿命预测

IF 5.7 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Yujia Zhao , Ming Lai , Yuqi Wu , Guangyao Li , Hao Jiang , Junjia Cui
{"title":"基于点云测量和梯度增强回归树的铝-钢磁脉冲卷曲接头疲劳寿命预测","authors":"Yujia Zhao ,&nbsp;Ming Lai ,&nbsp;Yuqi Wu ,&nbsp;Guangyao Li ,&nbsp;Hao Jiang ,&nbsp;Junjia Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fatigue life of magnetic pulse crimping (MPC) joints is crucial for the safe fatigue design of connection structures. Traditional fatigue life prediction methods primarily rely on loading condition analysis and fail to fully account for the impact of manufacturing variations (such as raw material dimensions, process parameters, and joint deformations), which presents challenges for accurate fatigue life prediction. To address this issue, this paper proposes a fatigue life prediction method for MPC joints that combines point cloud measurement and machine learning (ML) models. Random sample consensus (RANSAC) and point cloud segmentation are used to extract the joint deformation contour precisely. Compared to metallographic analysis, this method achieved non-destructive extraction of joint deformation features. Based on this, an integrated dataset covering the entire process from raw materials to fatigue testing is established. Five machine learning models are trained and tested, with results showing that the gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT) model performs the best. The visualization of a single decision tree in the GBRT model is analyzed, providing a transparent decision-making process. A comparison is made between the GBRT model and the traditional Basquin model. In the GBRT model, 100% of the training set and 90% of the testing set fall within the 1.5 times error band, while only 45% of the training set and 60% of the testing set in the Basquin model fall within this range. Additionally, the GBRT model achieves a higher coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>) on the dataset compared to the Basquin model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109020"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue life prediction of aluminum-steel magnetic pulse crimped joints based on point cloud measurement and gradient boosting regression trees\",\"authors\":\"Yujia Zhao ,&nbsp;Ming Lai ,&nbsp;Yuqi Wu ,&nbsp;Guangyao Li ,&nbsp;Hao Jiang ,&nbsp;Junjia Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The fatigue life of magnetic pulse crimping (MPC) joints is crucial for the safe fatigue design of connection structures. Traditional fatigue life prediction methods primarily rely on loading condition analysis and fail to fully account for the impact of manufacturing variations (such as raw material dimensions, process parameters, and joint deformations), which presents challenges for accurate fatigue life prediction. To address this issue, this paper proposes a fatigue life prediction method for MPC joints that combines point cloud measurement and machine learning (ML) models. Random sample consensus (RANSAC) and point cloud segmentation are used to extract the joint deformation contour precisely. Compared to metallographic analysis, this method achieved non-destructive extraction of joint deformation features. Based on this, an integrated dataset covering the entire process from raw materials to fatigue testing is established. Five machine learning models are trained and tested, with results showing that the gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT) model performs the best. The visualization of a single decision tree in the GBRT model is analyzed, providing a transparent decision-making process. A comparison is made between the GBRT model and the traditional Basquin model. In the GBRT model, 100% of the training set and 90% of the testing set fall within the 1.5 times error band, while only 45% of the training set and 60% of the testing set in the Basquin model fall within this range. Additionally, the GBRT model achieves a higher coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>) on the dataset compared to the Basquin model.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325002178\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325002178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磁脉冲压接接头的疲劳寿命对连接结构的安全疲劳设计至关重要。传统的疲劳寿命预测方法主要依赖于载荷状态分析,不能充分考虑制造变化(如原材料尺寸、工艺参数和接头变形)的影响,这给准确的疲劳寿命预测带来了挑战。针对这一问题,本文提出了一种结合点云测量和机器学习(ML)模型的MPC接头疲劳寿命预测方法。采用随机样本一致性(RANSAC)和点云分割技术精确提取关节变形轮廓。与金相分析方法相比,该方法实现了节理变形特征的无损提取。在此基础上,建立了涵盖从原材料到疲劳试验全过程的综合数据集。对五种机器学习模型进行了训练和测试,结果表明梯度增强回归树(GBRT)模型表现最好。分析了GBRT模型中单个决策树的可视化,提供了一个透明的决策过程。将GBRT模型与传统的Basquin模型进行了比较。在GBRT模型中,100%的训练集和90%的测试集落在1.5倍误差范围内,而Basquin模型中只有45%的训练集和60%的测试集落在这个范围内。此外,与Basquin模型相比,GBRT模型在数据集上实现了更高的决定系数(R2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fatigue life prediction of aluminum-steel magnetic pulse crimped joints based on point cloud measurement and gradient boosting regression trees
The fatigue life of magnetic pulse crimping (MPC) joints is crucial for the safe fatigue design of connection structures. Traditional fatigue life prediction methods primarily rely on loading condition analysis and fail to fully account for the impact of manufacturing variations (such as raw material dimensions, process parameters, and joint deformations), which presents challenges for accurate fatigue life prediction. To address this issue, this paper proposes a fatigue life prediction method for MPC joints that combines point cloud measurement and machine learning (ML) models. Random sample consensus (RANSAC) and point cloud segmentation are used to extract the joint deformation contour precisely. Compared to metallographic analysis, this method achieved non-destructive extraction of joint deformation features. Based on this, an integrated dataset covering the entire process from raw materials to fatigue testing is established. Five machine learning models are trained and tested, with results showing that the gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT) model performs the best. The visualization of a single decision tree in the GBRT model is analyzed, providing a transparent decision-making process. A comparison is made between the GBRT model and the traditional Basquin model. In the GBRT model, 100% of the training set and 90% of the testing set fall within the 1.5 times error band, while only 45% of the training set and 60% of the testing set in the Basquin model fall within this range. Additionally, the GBRT model achieves a higher coefficient of determination (R2) on the dataset compared to the Basquin model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fatigue
International Journal of Fatigue 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
21.70%
发文量
619
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address: Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements) Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions) Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation) Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信