生物基螯合剂防止和去除不相容盐水混合引起的矿物结垢的研究:对分子表征和活性力量的洞察

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Saeed Karami , Arezoo Rezaei , Mohsen Rahmati , Azam Motaghi , Mohsen Sepehr
{"title":"生物基螯合剂防止和去除不相容盐水混合引起的矿物结垢的研究:对分子表征和活性力量的洞察","authors":"Saeed Karami ,&nbsp;Arezoo Rezaei ,&nbsp;Mohsen Rahmati ,&nbsp;Azam Motaghi ,&nbsp;Mohsen Sepehr","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scaling is one of the problems that challenge smart water injection due to damage to reservoir porous media and causing wellbore skin. To alleviate this problem, six bio-based chelating agents were extracted from the waste of Glycyrrhiza glabra, Maple, Morus nigra, Eucalypt, Zyziphus spina Christi, and Platanus leaves to be used as scale inhibitors and removal for CaSO<sub>4</sub> and SrSO<sub>4</sub> salts. After characterizing the chelating agents via FTIR technique, HNMR spectroscopy, zeta potential, and CMC calculation, they were used in static inhibition and removal tests. According to the static tests, the chelating agents inhibited 85.7–95.8 % of the scale formation, and 29.7–85.9 % of the precipitated scales were removed by using them. Ion chromatography of filtrated water was investigated to cation (Sr<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup>) concentrations. The higher removal/inhibition efficiency was explained by the higher concentration of potential precipitating cations. The highest strontium and calcium concentration was observed in the sample inhibited by the chelating agent extracted by Glycyrrhiza glabra leaf waste, and on the next level, the agent extracted by maple waste. A comparison of static tests and characteristic indexes, which were given by the FTIR and HNMR techniques, showed that two mechanisms of electrostatic attraction and cation–π interaction are responsible for scale inhibition and removal. In other words, agents with more polar functional groups (such as O-H bonds) and electron-rich π compounds (such as alkenes and aromatic rings) are more feasible for inhibition and removal of scales. The adsorption of chelating agents was also studied to see their retention on reservoir rock. The adsorption of chelating agents on CaCO<sub>3</sub> powders was in the range of 11.2–19.2 mg/g, while their ultimate adsorption on SiO<sub>2</sub> was in the range of 7–10.3 mg/g. The higher adsorption potential of chelating agents was consistent with polar indexes, such as the alcoholic index of the FTIR technique, representing the fact that electrostatic interaction is the main intermolecular interaction for adsorbing chelating agents on the rock. Regarding the feasibility of economic waste-derived chelating agents for both scale inhibition and removal, a promising future is anticipated for using them in water injection projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 213947"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of bio-based chelating agents to prevent and remove mineral scales caused by mixing of incompatible brine water: An insight into molecular characterization and active forces\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Karami ,&nbsp;Arezoo Rezaei ,&nbsp;Mohsen Rahmati ,&nbsp;Azam Motaghi ,&nbsp;Mohsen Sepehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Scaling is one of the problems that challenge smart water injection due to damage to reservoir porous media and causing wellbore skin. To alleviate this problem, six bio-based chelating agents were extracted from the waste of Glycyrrhiza glabra, Maple, Morus nigra, Eucalypt, Zyziphus spina Christi, and Platanus leaves to be used as scale inhibitors and removal for CaSO<sub>4</sub> and SrSO<sub>4</sub> salts. After characterizing the chelating agents via FTIR technique, HNMR spectroscopy, zeta potential, and CMC calculation, they were used in static inhibition and removal tests. According to the static tests, the chelating agents inhibited 85.7–95.8 % of the scale formation, and 29.7–85.9 % of the precipitated scales were removed by using them. Ion chromatography of filtrated water was investigated to cation (Sr<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup>) concentrations. The higher removal/inhibition efficiency was explained by the higher concentration of potential precipitating cations. The highest strontium and calcium concentration was observed in the sample inhibited by the chelating agent extracted by Glycyrrhiza glabra leaf waste, and on the next level, the agent extracted by maple waste. A comparison of static tests and characteristic indexes, which were given by the FTIR and HNMR techniques, showed that two mechanisms of electrostatic attraction and cation–π interaction are responsible for scale inhibition and removal. In other words, agents with more polar functional groups (such as O-H bonds) and electron-rich π compounds (such as alkenes and aromatic rings) are more feasible for inhibition and removal of scales. The adsorption of chelating agents was also studied to see their retention on reservoir rock. The adsorption of chelating agents on CaCO<sub>3</sub> powders was in the range of 11.2–19.2 mg/g, while their ultimate adsorption on SiO<sub>2</sub> was in the range of 7–10.3 mg/g. The higher adsorption potential of chelating agents was consistent with polar indexes, such as the alcoholic index of the FTIR technique, representing the fact that electrostatic interaction is the main intermolecular interaction for adsorbing chelating agents on the rock. Regarding the feasibility of economic waste-derived chelating agents for both scale inhibition and removal, a promising future is anticipated for using them in water injection projects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"252 \",\"pages\":\"Article 213947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025003057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025003057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于储层多孔介质的破坏和井筒结皮,结垢是智能注水技术面临的难题之一。为解决这一问题,从光甘草、枫木、桑、桉树、合子和Platanus叶的废弃物中提取了6种生物基螯合剂,作为阻垢剂和去除CaSO4和SrSO4盐。通过FTIR技术、HNMR光谱、zeta电位和CMC计算对螯合剂进行了表征,并进行了静态抑制和去除试验。静态试验结果表明,螯合剂对水垢的抑制率为85.7 ~ 95.8%,对沉淀水垢的去除率为29.7 ~ 85.9%。用离子色谱法研究了过滤水的阳离子(Sr2+和Ca2+)浓度。较高的去除/抑制效率可以解释为较高浓度的潜在沉淀阳离子。用甘草叶渣提取的螯合剂抑制样品中锶和钙的浓度最高,枫叶渣提取的螯合剂抑制样品中锶和钙的浓度次之。FTIR和HNMR给出的静态测试和特征指标的比较表明,静电吸引和阳离子-π相互作用两种机制对阻垢和去除起作用。换句话说,具有更多极性官能团(如O-H键)和富电子π化合物(如烯烃和芳香环)的药剂更有可能抑制和去除鳞片。研究了螯合剂在储层岩石上的吸附情况。螯合剂在CaCO3粉体上的吸附量为11.2 ~ 19.2 mg/g,在SiO2上的最终吸附量为7 ~ 10.3 mg/g。螯合剂较高的吸附势与FTIR技术的醇指数等极性指标一致,说明静电相互作用是螯合剂在岩石上吸附的主要分子间相互作用。考虑到经济的废物螯合剂在阻垢和除垢方面的可行性,预计其在注水项目中的应用前景广阔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of bio-based chelating agents to prevent and remove mineral scales caused by mixing of incompatible brine water: An insight into molecular characterization and active forces
Scaling is one of the problems that challenge smart water injection due to damage to reservoir porous media and causing wellbore skin. To alleviate this problem, six bio-based chelating agents were extracted from the waste of Glycyrrhiza glabra, Maple, Morus nigra, Eucalypt, Zyziphus spina Christi, and Platanus leaves to be used as scale inhibitors and removal for CaSO4 and SrSO4 salts. After characterizing the chelating agents via FTIR technique, HNMR spectroscopy, zeta potential, and CMC calculation, they were used in static inhibition and removal tests. According to the static tests, the chelating agents inhibited 85.7–95.8 % of the scale formation, and 29.7–85.9 % of the precipitated scales were removed by using them. Ion chromatography of filtrated water was investigated to cation (Sr2+ and Ca2+) concentrations. The higher removal/inhibition efficiency was explained by the higher concentration of potential precipitating cations. The highest strontium and calcium concentration was observed in the sample inhibited by the chelating agent extracted by Glycyrrhiza glabra leaf waste, and on the next level, the agent extracted by maple waste. A comparison of static tests and characteristic indexes, which were given by the FTIR and HNMR techniques, showed that two mechanisms of electrostatic attraction and cation–π interaction are responsible for scale inhibition and removal. In other words, agents with more polar functional groups (such as O-H bonds) and electron-rich π compounds (such as alkenes and aromatic rings) are more feasible for inhibition and removal of scales. The adsorption of chelating agents was also studied to see their retention on reservoir rock. The adsorption of chelating agents on CaCO3 powders was in the range of 11.2–19.2 mg/g, while their ultimate adsorption on SiO2 was in the range of 7–10.3 mg/g. The higher adsorption potential of chelating agents was consistent with polar indexes, such as the alcoholic index of the FTIR technique, representing the fact that electrostatic interaction is the main intermolecular interaction for adsorbing chelating agents on the rock. Regarding the feasibility of economic waste-derived chelating agents for both scale inhibition and removal, a promising future is anticipated for using them in water injection projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信