肿瘤DNA甲基化面板对II期结肠癌复发风险分层的鉴定和外部验证

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Tanwei Yuan , Dominic Edelmann , Víctor Moreno , Elisabeth Georgii , Lisa Barros de Andrade e Sousa , Helena Pelin , Xiaofeng Jiang , Jakob Nikolas Kather , Katrin E. Tagscherer , Wilfried Roth , Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler , Alexander Brobeil , Matthias Kloor , Hendrik Bläker , Hermann Brenner , Michael Hoffmeister
{"title":"肿瘤DNA甲基化面板对II期结肠癌复发风险分层的鉴定和外部验证","authors":"Tanwei Yuan ,&nbsp;Dominic Edelmann ,&nbsp;Víctor Moreno ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Georgii ,&nbsp;Lisa Barros de Andrade e Sousa ,&nbsp;Helena Pelin ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Jiang ,&nbsp;Jakob Nikolas Kather ,&nbsp;Katrin E. Tagscherer ,&nbsp;Wilfried Roth ,&nbsp;Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler ,&nbsp;Alexander Brobeil ,&nbsp;Matthias Kloor ,&nbsp;Hendrik Bläker ,&nbsp;Hermann Brenner ,&nbsp;Michael Hoffmeister","doi":"10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tailoring surveillance and treatment strategies for stage II colon cancer (CC) after curative surgery remains challenging, and personalized approaches are lacking. We aimed to identify a gene methylation panel capable of stratifying high-risk stage II CC patients for recurrence beyond traditional clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Genome-wide tumor tissue DNA methylation data were analyzed from 562 stage II CC patients who underwent surgery in Germany (DACHS study). The cohort was divided into a training set (<em>N</em> = 395) and an internal validation set (<em>N</em> = 131), with external validation performed on 97 stage II CC patients from Spain. DNA methylation markers were primarily selected using the Elastic Net Cox model. The resulting prognostic index (PI), a combination of clinical factors and selected methylation markers, was compared to baseline models using clinical variables or microsatellite instability (MSI), with discrimination and prediction accuracy assessed through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and Brier scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final PI incorporated age, sex, tumor stage, location, and 27 DNA methylation markers. The PI consistently outperformed the baseline model including age, sex, and tumor stage in time-dependent AUC across validation cohorts (e.g., 1-year AUC and 95 % confidence interval: internal validation set, PI: 0.66, baseline model: 0.52; external validation set, PI: 0.72, baseline model: 0.64). In internal validation, the PI also showed a consistently improved time-dependent AUC compared with a combination of MSI and tumor stage only. Nevertheless, the PI did not improve the prediction accuracy of CC recurrence compared to the baseline model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identified 27 tumor tissue DNA methylation biomarkers that improved the discriminative power in classifying recurrence risk among stage II colon cancer patients. While this methylation panel alone lacks sufficient prediction accuracy for clinical application, its discriminative improvement suggests potential value as part of a multimodal risk-stratification tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48975,"journal":{"name":"Translational Oncology","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 102405"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and external validation of tumor DNA methylation panel for the recurrence risk stratification of stage II colon cancer\",\"authors\":\"Tanwei Yuan ,&nbsp;Dominic Edelmann ,&nbsp;Víctor Moreno ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Georgii ,&nbsp;Lisa Barros de Andrade e Sousa ,&nbsp;Helena Pelin ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Jiang ,&nbsp;Jakob Nikolas Kather ,&nbsp;Katrin E. Tagscherer ,&nbsp;Wilfried Roth ,&nbsp;Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler ,&nbsp;Alexander Brobeil ,&nbsp;Matthias Kloor ,&nbsp;Hendrik Bläker ,&nbsp;Hermann Brenner ,&nbsp;Michael Hoffmeister\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tailoring surveillance and treatment strategies for stage II colon cancer (CC) after curative surgery remains challenging, and personalized approaches are lacking. We aimed to identify a gene methylation panel capable of stratifying high-risk stage II CC patients for recurrence beyond traditional clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Genome-wide tumor tissue DNA methylation data were analyzed from 562 stage II CC patients who underwent surgery in Germany (DACHS study). The cohort was divided into a training set (<em>N</em> = 395) and an internal validation set (<em>N</em> = 131), with external validation performed on 97 stage II CC patients from Spain. DNA methylation markers were primarily selected using the Elastic Net Cox model. The resulting prognostic index (PI), a combination of clinical factors and selected methylation markers, was compared to baseline models using clinical variables or microsatellite instability (MSI), with discrimination and prediction accuracy assessed through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and Brier scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final PI incorporated age, sex, tumor stage, location, and 27 DNA methylation markers. The PI consistently outperformed the baseline model including age, sex, and tumor stage in time-dependent AUC across validation cohorts (e.g., 1-year AUC and 95 % confidence interval: internal validation set, PI: 0.66, baseline model: 0.52; external validation set, PI: 0.72, baseline model: 0.64). In internal validation, the PI also showed a consistently improved time-dependent AUC compared with a combination of MSI and tumor stage only. Nevertheless, the PI did not improve the prediction accuracy of CC recurrence compared to the baseline model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identified 27 tumor tissue DNA methylation biomarkers that improved the discriminative power in classifying recurrence risk among stage II colon cancer patients. While this methylation panel alone lacks sufficient prediction accuracy for clinical application, its discriminative improvement suggests potential value as part of a multimodal risk-stratification tool.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523325001366\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523325001366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对II期结肠癌(CC)进行根治性手术后的监测和治疗策略仍然具有挑战性,并且缺乏个性化的方法。我们的目标是确定一种基因甲基化小组,能够在传统临床变量之外对复发的高风险II期CC患者进行分层。方法分析562例在德国接受手术的II期CC患者的全基因组肿瘤组织DNA甲基化数据(DACHS研究)。该队列分为训练集(N = 395)和内部验证集(N = 131),其中外部验证对来自西班牙的97例II期CC患者进行了验证。DNA甲基化标记主要使用Elastic Net Cox模型选择。由此产生的预后指数(PI),临床因素和选定的甲基化标记物的组合,与使用临床变量或微卫星不稳定性(MSI)的基线模型进行比较,并通过随时间变化的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)和Brier评分评估区分和预测准确性。结果最终PI包括年龄、性别、肿瘤分期、部位和27项DNA甲基化标志物。在验证队列(例如,1年AUC和95%置信区间:内部验证集,PI: 0.66,基线模型:0.52;外部验证集,PI: 0.72,基线模型:0.64)。在内部验证中,与仅结合MSI和肿瘤分期相比,PI也显示出持续改善的随时间变化的AUC。然而,与基线模型相比,PI并没有提高CC复发的预测精度。结论本研究确定了27个肿瘤组织DNA甲基化生物标志物,提高了II期结肠癌患者复发风险分类的鉴别能力。虽然甲基化面板本身在临床应用中缺乏足够的预测准确性,但其判别性的改善表明,作为多模式风险分层工具的一部分,它具有潜在的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification and external validation of tumor DNA methylation panel for the recurrence risk stratification of stage II colon cancer

Background

Tailoring surveillance and treatment strategies for stage II colon cancer (CC) after curative surgery remains challenging, and personalized approaches are lacking. We aimed to identify a gene methylation panel capable of stratifying high-risk stage II CC patients for recurrence beyond traditional clinical variables.

Methods

Genome-wide tumor tissue DNA methylation data were analyzed from 562 stage II CC patients who underwent surgery in Germany (DACHS study). The cohort was divided into a training set (N = 395) and an internal validation set (N = 131), with external validation performed on 97 stage II CC patients from Spain. DNA methylation markers were primarily selected using the Elastic Net Cox model. The resulting prognostic index (PI), a combination of clinical factors and selected methylation markers, was compared to baseline models using clinical variables or microsatellite instability (MSI), with discrimination and prediction accuracy assessed through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and Brier scores.

Results

The final PI incorporated age, sex, tumor stage, location, and 27 DNA methylation markers. The PI consistently outperformed the baseline model including age, sex, and tumor stage in time-dependent AUC across validation cohorts (e.g., 1-year AUC and 95 % confidence interval: internal validation set, PI: 0.66, baseline model: 0.52; external validation set, PI: 0.72, baseline model: 0.64). In internal validation, the PI also showed a consistently improved time-dependent AUC compared with a combination of MSI and tumor stage only. Nevertheless, the PI did not improve the prediction accuracy of CC recurrence compared to the baseline model.

Conclusions

This study identified 27 tumor tissue DNA methylation biomarkers that improved the discriminative power in classifying recurrence risk among stage II colon cancer patients. While this methylation panel alone lacks sufficient prediction accuracy for clinical application, its discriminative improvement suggests potential value as part of a multimodal risk-stratification tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
314
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Translational Oncology publishes the results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of oncology patients. Translational Oncology will publish laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer. Peer reviewed manuscript types include Original Reports, Reviews and Editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信