解剖性全肩关节置换术中金属背盂的再评价

Q4 Medicine
Nathan Sarli BS , Kassem Ghayyad MD , Samuel Harmsen MD , G. Russell Huffman MD, MPH
{"title":"解剖性全肩关节置换术中金属背盂的再评价","authors":"Nathan Sarli BS ,&nbsp;Kassem Ghayyad MD ,&nbsp;Samuel Harmsen MD ,&nbsp;G. Russell Huffman MD, MPH","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The idea of metal-backed glenoid (MBG) components offers a promising alternative to traditional all-polyethylene (PE), cemented glenoid implants in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Despite the historically high success rate of TSA, challenges such as backside wear, PE debris disease, and significant glenoid bone loss during revision surgeries necessitate the development of improved glenoid component designs. Unlike original designs, the modern MBG components are modular and convertible, exemplified by advancements from companies like Lima, Arthrex, and Zimmer. The ability to exchange PE liners and ultimately to convert to a reverse TSA in the current generation of implants has addressed some early concerns and offers insight into previously elusive solutions for anatomic total shoulder replacements. These more modern MBG components simplify the conversion from anatomic TSA to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, thus shortening the surgery, minimizing blood loss and reducing the complication rates associated with revision surgeries. They also enable correction of glenoid deformities both with respect to glenoid version and glenoid inclination that proven elusive with all PE implants. This paper highlights the design improvements, clinical indications, and future prospects of these components, underscoring their role in enhancing patient outcomes in TSA and hinting that further design developments are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 174-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluating the metal-backed glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Sarli BS ,&nbsp;Kassem Ghayyad MD ,&nbsp;Samuel Harmsen MD ,&nbsp;G. Russell Huffman MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The idea of metal-backed glenoid (MBG) components offers a promising alternative to traditional all-polyethylene (PE), cemented glenoid implants in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Despite the historically high success rate of TSA, challenges such as backside wear, PE debris disease, and significant glenoid bone loss during revision surgeries necessitate the development of improved glenoid component designs. Unlike original designs, the modern MBG components are modular and convertible, exemplified by advancements from companies like Lima, Arthrex, and Zimmer. The ability to exchange PE liners and ultimately to convert to a reverse TSA in the current generation of implants has addressed some early concerns and offers insight into previously elusive solutions for anatomic total shoulder replacements. These more modern MBG components simplify the conversion from anatomic TSA to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, thus shortening the surgery, minimizing blood loss and reducing the complication rates associated with revision surgeries. They also enable correction of glenoid deformities both with respect to glenoid version and glenoid inclination that proven elusive with all PE implants. This paper highlights the design improvements, clinical indications, and future prospects of these components, underscoring their role in enhancing patient outcomes in TSA and hinting that further design developments are needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 174-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452725000021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452725000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全肩关节置换术(TSA)中,金属背衬关节盂(MBG)组件的想法为传统的全聚乙烯(PE)骨水泥关节盂植入物提供了一个有希望的替代方案。尽管历史上TSA的成功率很高,但诸如背部磨损、PE碎片疾病和翻修手术中显著的盂骨丢失等挑战需要改进盂骨假体设计。与最初的设计不同,现代MBG组件是模块化和可转换的,利马、Arthrex和Zimmer等公司的进步就是一个例子。在当前一代的植入物中,PE衬垫交换和最终转换为反向TSA的能力解决了一些早期的问题,并为解剖性全肩关节置换术提供了以前难以捉摸的解决方案。这些更现代的MBG组件简化了从解剖TSA到反向肩关节置换术的转换,从而缩短了手术时间,最大限度地减少了失血,减少了与翻修手术相关的并发症发生率。它们还可以矫正所有PE植入物难以矫正的盂内翻和盂内倾的盂内畸形。本文重点介绍了这些组件的设计改进、临床适应症和未来前景,强调了它们在提高TSA患者预后方面的作用,并暗示需要进一步的设计开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-evaluating the metal-backed glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
The idea of metal-backed glenoid (MBG) components offers a promising alternative to traditional all-polyethylene (PE), cemented glenoid implants in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Despite the historically high success rate of TSA, challenges such as backside wear, PE debris disease, and significant glenoid bone loss during revision surgeries necessitate the development of improved glenoid component designs. Unlike original designs, the modern MBG components are modular and convertible, exemplified by advancements from companies like Lima, Arthrex, and Zimmer. The ability to exchange PE liners and ultimately to convert to a reverse TSA in the current generation of implants has addressed some early concerns and offers insight into previously elusive solutions for anatomic total shoulder replacements. These more modern MBG components simplify the conversion from anatomic TSA to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, thus shortening the surgery, minimizing blood loss and reducing the complication rates associated with revision surgeries. They also enable correction of glenoid deformities both with respect to glenoid version and glenoid inclination that proven elusive with all PE implants. This paper highlights the design improvements, clinical indications, and future prospects of these components, underscoring their role in enhancing patient outcomes in TSA and hinting that further design developments are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信