了解荷兰社区老年人的脆弱经历:一项定性现象学研究

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
R.D.J. Golbach , N. Kleinenberg-Talsma , H. Jager-Wittenaar , J.S.M. Hobbelen , E.J. Finnema
{"title":"了解荷兰社区老年人的脆弱经历:一项定性现象学研究","authors":"R.D.J. Golbach ,&nbsp;N. Kleinenberg-Talsma ,&nbsp;H. Jager-Wittenaar ,&nbsp;J.S.M. Hobbelen ,&nbsp;E.J. Finnema","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the population ages, the proportion of frail older people is also increasing. While attention to frailty experiences has increased, how these account to a comprehensive understanding of frailty and its impact on behavior and functioning remains understudied. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to understand how frailty is experienced, and how frailty and frailty experiences affect behavior and functioning from the perspectives of Dutch community-dwelling older people. In this phenomenological qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 community-dwelling older people (≥65 years). The ‘Tilburg Frailty Indicator’ was administered to measure frailty, 15 of the participants were considered frail. Thematic analysis revealed the following themes and subthemes: 1) frailty experiences: <em>situation related, initiated internally, initiated externally,</em> and <em>being and feeling frail;</em> 2) coping: <em>cognitive efforts, behavioral efforts,</em> and <em>emotional aspects.</em> The distinction between being frail and feeling frail was, among other things, reflected in the temporality of frailty experiences, such as short periods of moments in time experiencing frailty. Personal factors and contexts strongly influence an individual's experiences and multiple coping strategies were discovered, with mindset shaping individual coping strategies. We recommend a personalized approach in which the experiences and capabilities of older people are considered to support them in maintaining or enhancing their well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding frailty experiences in Dutch community-dwelling older people: A qualitative phenomenological study\",\"authors\":\"R.D.J. Golbach ,&nbsp;N. Kleinenberg-Talsma ,&nbsp;H. Jager-Wittenaar ,&nbsp;J.S.M. Hobbelen ,&nbsp;E.J. Finnema\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the population ages, the proportion of frail older people is also increasing. While attention to frailty experiences has increased, how these account to a comprehensive understanding of frailty and its impact on behavior and functioning remains understudied. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to understand how frailty is experienced, and how frailty and frailty experiences affect behavior and functioning from the perspectives of Dutch community-dwelling older people. In this phenomenological qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 community-dwelling older people (≥65 years). The ‘Tilburg Frailty Indicator’ was administered to measure frailty, 15 of the participants were considered frail. Thematic analysis revealed the following themes and subthemes: 1) frailty experiences: <em>situation related, initiated internally, initiated externally,</em> and <em>being and feeling frail;</em> 2) coping: <em>cognitive efforts, behavioral efforts,</em> and <em>emotional aspects.</em> The distinction between being frail and feeling frail was, among other things, reflected in the temporality of frailty experiences, such as short periods of moments in time experiencing frailty. Personal factors and contexts strongly influence an individual's experiences and multiple coping strategies were discovered, with mindset shaping individual coping strategies. We recommend a personalized approach in which the experiences and capabilities of older people are considered to support them in maintaining or enhancing their well-being.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406525000246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406525000246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人口老龄化,体弱老年人的比例也在增加。虽然对脆弱经历的关注有所增加,但这些如何解释对脆弱及其对行为和功能的影响的全面理解仍未得到充分研究。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在了解脆弱是如何经历的,以及脆弱和脆弱经历如何影响荷兰社区老年人的行为和功能。在这项现象学定性研究中,我们对36名社区居住的老年人(≥65岁)进行了半结构化访谈。“蒂尔堡虚弱指数”被用来衡量虚弱,15名参与者被认为虚弱。主题分析揭示了以下主题和副主题:1)脆弱体验:情境相关、内在触发、外在触发、脆弱存在和脆弱感受;2)应对:认知努力、行为努力和情绪方面。脆弱和感觉脆弱之间的区别,除其他外,反映在脆弱经历的短暂性上,比如短暂的时刻经历脆弱。个人因素和情境对个体的应对体验有显著影响,个体的应对策略有多种,心态塑造个体的应对策略。我们建议采取一种个性化的方法,考虑到老年人的经验和能力,以支持他们维持或提高他们的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding frailty experiences in Dutch community-dwelling older people: A qualitative phenomenological study
As the population ages, the proportion of frail older people is also increasing. While attention to frailty experiences has increased, how these account to a comprehensive understanding of frailty and its impact on behavior and functioning remains understudied. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to understand how frailty is experienced, and how frailty and frailty experiences affect behavior and functioning from the perspectives of Dutch community-dwelling older people. In this phenomenological qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 community-dwelling older people (≥65 years). The ‘Tilburg Frailty Indicator’ was administered to measure frailty, 15 of the participants were considered frail. Thematic analysis revealed the following themes and subthemes: 1) frailty experiences: situation related, initiated internally, initiated externally, and being and feeling frail; 2) coping: cognitive efforts, behavioral efforts, and emotional aspects. The distinction between being frail and feeling frail was, among other things, reflected in the temporality of frailty experiences, such as short periods of moments in time experiencing frailty. Personal factors and contexts strongly influence an individual's experiences and multiple coping strategies were discovered, with mindset shaping individual coping strategies. We recommend a personalized approach in which the experiences and capabilities of older people are considered to support them in maintaining or enhancing their well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信