Balaji Selvaraj PhD , Xingyi Zhao MS , Haibo Lin PhD , Jiajian Shen PhD , Chingyun Cheng PhD , Alex Bookbinder BS , Hui Wu MD , Huifang Zhai MS , J. Isabelle Choi MD , Arpit M. Chhabra MD , Shaakir Hasan DO , Charles B. Simone II MD , Yoshiya Yamada MD , Minglei Kang PhD
{"title":"使用单能量质子原始布拉格峰传递技术的FLASH立体定向全身放射治疗脊柱肿瘤","authors":"Balaji Selvaraj PhD , Xingyi Zhao MS , Haibo Lin PhD , Jiajian Shen PhD , Chingyun Cheng PhD , Alex Bookbinder BS , Hui Wu MD , Huifang Zhai MS , J. Isabelle Choi MD , Arpit M. Chhabra MD , Shaakir Hasan DO , Charles B. Simone II MD , Yoshiya Yamada MD , Minglei Kang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the dosimetric performance and dose rate of Bragg peak FLASH (BP-FLASH) for spinal cord stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Ten consecutive patients with spinal tumors treated with conventional intensity modulated proton therapy (CONV-IMPT) SBRT (40 Gy in 5 fractions) were selected for this study. These patients were reoptimized using an in-house FLASH algorithm and a single-energy Bragg peak approach. The dose distributions and dose metrics for target coverage and critical organs-at-risk (OARs) were compared. BP-FLASH plans dose rates were calculated using an average-dose-rate. The FLASH ratios (V<sub>40Gy/s</sub>) were assessed with dose thresholds at 0.2, 2, and 5 Gy. The doses and dose rates for the 10 patients were averaged, and a <em>t</em> test was performed comparing CONV-IMPT and BP-FLASH.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dosimetric analysis revealed that the BP-FLASH plans deliver a similar dose as CONV-IMPT plans to critical OARs. However, in BP-FLASH, the clinical target volume received a higher maximum dose than CONV-IMPT (115.1% versus 108.9%, <em>P</em> = .001). No notable differences were observed in the maximum doses to the spinal cord (<em>P</em> = .122) or esophagus (<em>P</em> = .327). FLASH dose rates for all the OARs exceeded 80% with 2 Gy dose threshold. When increased to 5 Gy, V<sub>40Gy/s</sub> increased to >95% for composite plan doses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BP-FLASH SBRT is a promising treatment for challenging spinal cord cancers, which achieved ultra-high-dose rates for FLASH effect and maintained the same dosimetry quality as the CONV-IMPT plans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 6","pages":"Article 101776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FLASH Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Tumors Using a Single-Energy Proton Pristine Bragg Peak Delivery Technique\",\"authors\":\"Balaji Selvaraj PhD , Xingyi Zhao MS , Haibo Lin PhD , Jiajian Shen PhD , Chingyun Cheng PhD , Alex Bookbinder BS , Hui Wu MD , Huifang Zhai MS , J. Isabelle Choi MD , Arpit M. Chhabra MD , Shaakir Hasan DO , Charles B. Simone II MD , Yoshiya Yamada MD , Minglei Kang PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the dosimetric performance and dose rate of Bragg peak FLASH (BP-FLASH) for spinal cord stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Ten consecutive patients with spinal tumors treated with conventional intensity modulated proton therapy (CONV-IMPT) SBRT (40 Gy in 5 fractions) were selected for this study. These patients were reoptimized using an in-house FLASH algorithm and a single-energy Bragg peak approach. The dose distributions and dose metrics for target coverage and critical organs-at-risk (OARs) were compared. BP-FLASH plans dose rates were calculated using an average-dose-rate. The FLASH ratios (V<sub>40Gy/s</sub>) were assessed with dose thresholds at 0.2, 2, and 5 Gy. The doses and dose rates for the 10 patients were averaged, and a <em>t</em> test was performed comparing CONV-IMPT and BP-FLASH.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dosimetric analysis revealed that the BP-FLASH plans deliver a similar dose as CONV-IMPT plans to critical OARs. However, in BP-FLASH, the clinical target volume received a higher maximum dose than CONV-IMPT (115.1% versus 108.9%, <em>P</em> = .001). No notable differences were observed in the maximum doses to the spinal cord (<em>P</em> = .122) or esophagus (<em>P</em> = .327). FLASH dose rates for all the OARs exceeded 80% with 2 Gy dose threshold. When increased to 5 Gy, V<sub>40Gy/s</sub> increased to >95% for composite plan doses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BP-FLASH SBRT is a promising treatment for challenging spinal cord cancers, which achieved ultra-high-dose rates for FLASH effect and maintained the same dosimetry quality as the CONV-IMPT plans.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
FLASH Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Tumors Using a Single-Energy Proton Pristine Bragg Peak Delivery Technique
Purpose
To investigate the dosimetric performance and dose rate of Bragg peak FLASH (BP-FLASH) for spinal cord stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Methods and Materials
Ten consecutive patients with spinal tumors treated with conventional intensity modulated proton therapy (CONV-IMPT) SBRT (40 Gy in 5 fractions) were selected for this study. These patients were reoptimized using an in-house FLASH algorithm and a single-energy Bragg peak approach. The dose distributions and dose metrics for target coverage and critical organs-at-risk (OARs) were compared. BP-FLASH plans dose rates were calculated using an average-dose-rate. The FLASH ratios (V40Gy/s) were assessed with dose thresholds at 0.2, 2, and 5 Gy. The doses and dose rates for the 10 patients were averaged, and a t test was performed comparing CONV-IMPT and BP-FLASH.
Results
Dosimetric analysis revealed that the BP-FLASH plans deliver a similar dose as CONV-IMPT plans to critical OARs. However, in BP-FLASH, the clinical target volume received a higher maximum dose than CONV-IMPT (115.1% versus 108.9%, P = .001). No notable differences were observed in the maximum doses to the spinal cord (P = .122) or esophagus (P = .327). FLASH dose rates for all the OARs exceeded 80% with 2 Gy dose threshold. When increased to 5 Gy, V40Gy/s increased to >95% for composite plan doses.
Conclusions
BP-FLASH SBRT is a promising treatment for challenging spinal cord cancers, which achieved ultra-high-dose rates for FLASH effect and maintained the same dosimetry quality as the CONV-IMPT plans.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.