Rebecca C. Sagar, Daisie M. Yates, Sam M. Pearson, Noppadol Kietsiriroje, Matthew S. Hindle, Lih T. Cheah, Beth A. Webb, Ramzi A. Ajjan, Khalid M. Naseem
{"title":"1型糖尿病胰岛素抵抗是血小板高反应性的关键调节因子","authors":"Rebecca C. Sagar, Daisie M. Yates, Sam M. Pearson, Noppadol Kietsiriroje, Matthew S. Hindle, Lih T. Cheah, Beth A. Webb, Ramzi A. Ajjan, Khalid M. Naseem","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06429-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at increased cardiovascular risk, particularly in the presence of insulin resistance. A prothrombotic environment is believed to contribute to this risk but thrombotic pathways in type 1 diabetes are only partially understood and the role of platelets is incompletely studied. We hypothesised that platelets from individuals with type 1 diabetes exhibit platelet hyperactivity due to both increased propensity for activation and diminished sensitivity to inhibition, with an amplified maladaptive phenotype in those with insulin resistance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Blood samples were obtained from individuals with type 1 diabetes enrolled on the ‘Double diabEtes and adVErse cLinical Outcome: identification of mechanistic Pathways’ (DEVELOP) study with insulin resistance assessed as estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), whereby eGDR >8 or <6 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> indicates normal insulin sensitivity or advanced insulin resistance, respectively. Platelet function was analysed using whole blood multiparameter flow cytometry to simultaneously measure three distinct markers of activation, including integrin α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> (PAC-1 binding), P-selectin (CD62P) and phosphatidylserine (PS) (Annexin V). Both activation and inhibition responses of the platelets were investigated, which were subjected to the machine learning tool Full Annotation Shape-constrained Trees (FAUST) to characterise platelet subpopulations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 32 individuals with type 1 diabetes were studied (median age [range] of 24 [18–34] years, 59% male, diabetes duration [mean ± SD] of 14.0 ± 6.3 years and HbA<sub>1c</sub> of 65.3 ± 14.0 mmol/mol [8.1%]). An increased basal expression, measured as mean fluorescence intensity, of all three platelet activation markers was detected in the type 1 diabetes group compared with healthy control participants (CD62P expression 521 ± 246 vs 335 ± 67; <i>p</i><0.001, PAC-1 370 ± 165 vs 231 ± 88; <i>p</i>=0.011 and PS 869 ± 762 vs 294 ± 109; <i>p</i>=0.001). Following platelet stimulation, an enhanced activation of these markers was found in the type 1 diabetes group. Within the type 1 diabetes group, those with advanced insulin resistance (eGDR<6 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) showed increased platelet activation compared with individuals with normal insulin sensitivity (eGDR>8 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) with single agonist stimulation CD62P expression (29,167 ± 2177 vs 22,829 ± 2535, <i>p</i><0.001 and PAC-1 19,339 ± 11,749 and 5187 ± 2872, <i>p</i>=0.02). Moreover, individuals with type 1 diabetes showed reduced sensitivity to platelet inhibition by prostacyclin (PGI<sub>2</sub>) compared with control participants. Stratification of individuals with type 1 diabetes by insulin resistance demonstrated that in the presence of PGI<sub>2</sub>, suppression of stimulated CD62P was 17 ± 11% and 33 ± 12% (<i>p</i>=0.02) for advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, respectively, with even larger differences demonstrated for PAC-1 (48 ± 17% and 75 ± 7%; <i>p</i>=0.006) and PS exposure (33 ± 12% and 84 ± 10%; <i>p</i>=0.001). Furthermore, FAUST analysis showed that, under basal conditions, there was a different distribution of the eight platelet subpopulations comparing advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, with differences also detected following PGI<sub>2</sub> inhibition.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>Our novel characterisation of platelets in type 1 diabetes shows a maladaptive phenotype with increased basal activity together with hyperactivation following stimulation and diminished responses to inhibition. Insulin resistance appears to further drive this adverse thrombotic phenotype, suggesting an enhanced platelet-driven cardiovascular risk in those with type 1 diabetes and reduced insulin sensitivity.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes is a key modulator of platelet hyperreactivity\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca C. Sagar, Daisie M. Yates, Sam M. Pearson, Noppadol Kietsiriroje, Matthew S. Hindle, Lih T. Cheah, Beth A. Webb, Ramzi A. Ajjan, Khalid M. Naseem\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00125-025-06429-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at increased cardiovascular risk, particularly in the presence of insulin resistance. A prothrombotic environment is believed to contribute to this risk but thrombotic pathways in type 1 diabetes are only partially understood and the role of platelets is incompletely studied. We hypothesised that platelets from individuals with type 1 diabetes exhibit platelet hyperactivity due to both increased propensity for activation and diminished sensitivity to inhibition, with an amplified maladaptive phenotype in those with insulin resistance.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Blood samples were obtained from individuals with type 1 diabetes enrolled on the ‘Double diabEtes and adVErse cLinical Outcome: identification of mechanistic Pathways’ (DEVELOP) study with insulin resistance assessed as estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), whereby eGDR >8 or <6 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> indicates normal insulin sensitivity or advanced insulin resistance, respectively. Platelet function was analysed using whole blood multiparameter flow cytometry to simultaneously measure three distinct markers of activation, including integrin α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> (PAC-1 binding), P-selectin (CD62P) and phosphatidylserine (PS) (Annexin V). Both activation and inhibition responses of the platelets were investigated, which were subjected to the machine learning tool Full Annotation Shape-constrained Trees (FAUST) to characterise platelet subpopulations.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>A total of 32 individuals with type 1 diabetes were studied (median age [range] of 24 [18–34] years, 59% male, diabetes duration [mean ± SD] of 14.0 ± 6.3 years and HbA<sub>1c</sub> of 65.3 ± 14.0 mmol/mol [8.1%]). An increased basal expression, measured as mean fluorescence intensity, of all three platelet activation markers was detected in the type 1 diabetes group compared with healthy control participants (CD62P expression 521 ± 246 vs 335 ± 67; <i>p</i><0.001, PAC-1 370 ± 165 vs 231 ± 88; <i>p</i>=0.011 and PS 869 ± 762 vs 294 ± 109; <i>p</i>=0.001). Following platelet stimulation, an enhanced activation of these markers was found in the type 1 diabetes group. Within the type 1 diabetes group, those with advanced insulin resistance (eGDR<6 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) showed increased platelet activation compared with individuals with normal insulin sensitivity (eGDR>8 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) with single agonist stimulation CD62P expression (29,167 ± 2177 vs 22,829 ± 2535, <i>p</i><0.001 and PAC-1 19,339 ± 11,749 and 5187 ± 2872, <i>p</i>=0.02). Moreover, individuals with type 1 diabetes showed reduced sensitivity to platelet inhibition by prostacyclin (PGI<sub>2</sub>) compared with control participants. Stratification of individuals with type 1 diabetes by insulin resistance demonstrated that in the presence of PGI<sub>2</sub>, suppression of stimulated CD62P was 17 ± 11% and 33 ± 12% (<i>p</i>=0.02) for advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, respectively, with even larger differences demonstrated for PAC-1 (48 ± 17% and 75 ± 7%; <i>p</i>=0.006) and PS exposure (33 ± 12% and 84 ± 10%; <i>p</i>=0.001). Furthermore, FAUST analysis showed that, under basal conditions, there was a different distribution of the eight platelet subpopulations comparing advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, with differences also detected following PGI<sub>2</sub> inhibition.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>Our novel characterisation of platelets in type 1 diabetes shows a maladaptive phenotype with increased basal activity together with hyperactivation following stimulation and diminished responses to inhibition. Insulin resistance appears to further drive this adverse thrombotic phenotype, suggesting an enhanced platelet-driven cardiovascular risk in those with type 1 diabetes and reduced insulin sensitivity.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetologia\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06429-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06429-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的/假设1型糖尿病患者心血管风险增加,特别是在存在胰岛素抵抗的情况下。血栓形成前的环境被认为有助于这种风险,但1型糖尿病的血栓形成途径仅被部分理解,血小板的作用尚未完全研究。我们假设来自1型糖尿病患者的血小板表现出血小板过度活跃,这是由于激活倾向增加和抑制敏感性降低,而胰岛素抵抗患者的适应不良表型放大。方法:从“双重糖尿病和不良临床结果:识别机制途径”(DEVELOP)研究中纳入的1型糖尿病患者的血液样本中获取胰岛素抵抗,以估计葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)评估,其中eGDR >;8或<;6 mg kg - 1 min - 1分别表示正常胰岛素敏感性或晚期胰岛素抵抗。采用全血多参数流式细胞术分析血小板功能,同时测量三种不同的活化标志物,包括整合素α ib β3 (PAC-1结合)、p -选择素(CD62P)和磷脂酰丝氨酸(PS)(膜联蛋白V)。研究了血小板的激活和抑制反应,这些反应受到机器学习工具全注释形状约束树(FAUST)的影响,以表征血小板亚群。结果本组共纳入32例1型糖尿病患者,平均年龄[18-34]岁,男性59%,病程[平均±SD] 14.0±6.3年,HbA1c为65.3±14.0 mmol/mol[8.1%]。与健康对照组相比,1型糖尿病组检测到所有三种血小板激活标志物的基础表达(以平均荧光强度测量)增加(CD62P表达521±246 vs 335±67;p<0.001, PAC-1 370±165 vs 231±88;p=0.011, PS为869±762 vs 294±109;p = 0.001)。在血小板刺激后,在1型糖尿病组中发现这些标记物的激活增强。在1型糖尿病组中,与胰岛素敏感性正常(eGDR>8 mg kg -1 min -1)的患者相比,晚期胰岛素抵抗(eGDR> 6 mg kg -1 min -1)患者在单一激动剂刺激CD62P表达(29,167±2177 vs 22,829±2535,p<;0.001和PAC-1 19,339±11,749和5187±2872,p=0.02)时血小板活化增加。此外,与对照组相比,1型糖尿病患者对前列环素(PGI2)抑制血小板的敏感性降低。通过胰岛素抵抗对1型糖尿病患者进行分层,发现PGI2存在时,晚期胰岛素抵抗组和正常胰岛素敏感组受刺激CD62P的抑制分别为17±11%和33±12% (p=0.02), PAC-1的差异更大(48±17%和75±7%);p=0.006)和PS暴露(33±12%和84±10%);p = 0.001)。此外,FAUST分析显示,在基础条件下,晚期胰岛素抵抗组与正常胰岛素敏感组相比,8个血小板亚群的分布存在差异,PGI2抑制后也存在差异。结论/解释:我们对1型糖尿病患者血小板的新特征显示出一种不适应表型,即基础活性增加,刺激后过度激活,抑制后反应减弱。胰岛素抵抗似乎进一步推动了这种不良的血栓表型,这表明1型糖尿病患者血小板驱动的心血管风险增加,胰岛素敏感性降低。图形抽象
Insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes is a key modulator of platelet hyperreactivity
Aims/hypothesis
Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at increased cardiovascular risk, particularly in the presence of insulin resistance. A prothrombotic environment is believed to contribute to this risk but thrombotic pathways in type 1 diabetes are only partially understood and the role of platelets is incompletely studied. We hypothesised that platelets from individuals with type 1 diabetes exhibit platelet hyperactivity due to both increased propensity for activation and diminished sensitivity to inhibition, with an amplified maladaptive phenotype in those with insulin resistance.
Methods
Blood samples were obtained from individuals with type 1 diabetes enrolled on the ‘Double diabEtes and adVErse cLinical Outcome: identification of mechanistic Pathways’ (DEVELOP) study with insulin resistance assessed as estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), whereby eGDR >8 or <6 mg kg−1 min−1 indicates normal insulin sensitivity or advanced insulin resistance, respectively. Platelet function was analysed using whole blood multiparameter flow cytometry to simultaneously measure three distinct markers of activation, including integrin αIIbβ3 (PAC-1 binding), P-selectin (CD62P) and phosphatidylserine (PS) (Annexin V). Both activation and inhibition responses of the platelets were investigated, which were subjected to the machine learning tool Full Annotation Shape-constrained Trees (FAUST) to characterise platelet subpopulations.
Results
A total of 32 individuals with type 1 diabetes were studied (median age [range] of 24 [18–34] years, 59% male, diabetes duration [mean ± SD] of 14.0 ± 6.3 years and HbA1c of 65.3 ± 14.0 mmol/mol [8.1%]). An increased basal expression, measured as mean fluorescence intensity, of all three platelet activation markers was detected in the type 1 diabetes group compared with healthy control participants (CD62P expression 521 ± 246 vs 335 ± 67; p<0.001, PAC-1 370 ± 165 vs 231 ± 88; p=0.011 and PS 869 ± 762 vs 294 ± 109; p=0.001). Following platelet stimulation, an enhanced activation of these markers was found in the type 1 diabetes group. Within the type 1 diabetes group, those with advanced insulin resistance (eGDR<6 mg kg−1 min−1) showed increased platelet activation compared with individuals with normal insulin sensitivity (eGDR>8 mg kg−1 min−1) with single agonist stimulation CD62P expression (29,167 ± 2177 vs 22,829 ± 2535, p<0.001 and PAC-1 19,339 ± 11,749 and 5187 ± 2872, p=0.02). Moreover, individuals with type 1 diabetes showed reduced sensitivity to platelet inhibition by prostacyclin (PGI2) compared with control participants. Stratification of individuals with type 1 diabetes by insulin resistance demonstrated that in the presence of PGI2, suppression of stimulated CD62P was 17 ± 11% and 33 ± 12% (p=0.02) for advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, respectively, with even larger differences demonstrated for PAC-1 (48 ± 17% and 75 ± 7%; p=0.006) and PS exposure (33 ± 12% and 84 ± 10%; p=0.001). Furthermore, FAUST analysis showed that, under basal conditions, there was a different distribution of the eight platelet subpopulations comparing advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, with differences also detected following PGI2 inhibition.
Conclusions/interpretation
Our novel characterisation of platelets in type 1 diabetes shows a maladaptive phenotype with increased basal activity together with hyperactivation following stimulation and diminished responses to inhibition. Insulin resistance appears to further drive this adverse thrombotic phenotype, suggesting an enhanced platelet-driven cardiovascular risk in those with type 1 diabetes and reduced insulin sensitivity.
期刊介绍:
Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.