Jérôme Fayette, Lisa Licitra, Kevin Harrington, Robert Haddad, Lillian L. Siu, Yi-Chun Liu, Makoto Tahara, Jean-Pascal Machiels, Danny Rischin, Tanguy Y. Seiwert, Robert L. Ferris, Ulrich Keilholz, Amanda Psyrri, Bhumsuk Keam, Paolo Bossi, Robert Metcalf, Ching-Yun Hsieh, Paul M.J. Clement, Pavel Isaev, Ali Mudunov, José Dinis, Ann Hoeben, Stefan Kasper, Konrad Klinghammer, Michael Hwang, Jorge Blando, Olivier Serrano, Dario Ruscica, Roger B. Cohen
{"title":"INTERLINK-1:单抗联合西妥昔单抗治疗复发/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的III期、随机、安慰剂对照研究","authors":"Jérôme Fayette, Lisa Licitra, Kevin Harrington, Robert Haddad, Lillian L. Siu, Yi-Chun Liu, Makoto Tahara, Jean-Pascal Machiels, Danny Rischin, Tanguy Y. Seiwert, Robert L. Ferris, Ulrich Keilholz, Amanda Psyrri, Bhumsuk Keam, Paolo Bossi, Robert Metcalf, Ching-Yun Hsieh, Paul M.J. Clement, Pavel Isaev, Ali Mudunov, José Dinis, Ann Hoeben, Stefan Kasper, Konrad Klinghammer, Michael Hwang, Jorge Blando, Olivier Serrano, Dario Ruscica, Roger B. Cohen","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Treatment options for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and platinum-based chemotherapy are limited. Preliminary data suggested monalizumab plus cetuximab had clinical activity in R/M HNSCC. Participants and methods: INTERLINK-1 (NCT04590963) was a double-blind, phase III study. Participants with R/M HNSCC who had received ICI therapy and progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to monalizumab (750 mg, fortnightly) or placebo, plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose, then 250 mg/m2, weekly). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in participants with non-oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) or human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative OPC (HPV-unrelated analysis set). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: At data cut-off, 216 participants were randomized in the HPV-unrelated analysis set; 145 to monalizumab plus cetuximab and 71 to placebo plus cetuximab. Median OS was 8.8 months for monalizumab plus cetuximab versus 8.6 months for placebo plus cetuximab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.66–1.54); median PFS was 3.6 versus 3.8 months, respectively (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79–1.57); and ORR was 15.2% versus 23.9%, respectively. INTERLINK-1 was terminated after a preplanned interim analysis showed futility criteria were met (predetermined futility HR >0.874). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 18.3% and 17.2% of participants treated in the monalizumab and placebo arms, respectively. Conclusions: Monalizumab plus cetuximab did not improve OS compared with placebo plus cetuximab. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with safety observations for cetuximab monotherapy.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTERLINK-1: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Monalizumab Plus Cetuximab in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Jérôme Fayette, Lisa Licitra, Kevin Harrington, Robert Haddad, Lillian L. Siu, Yi-Chun Liu, Makoto Tahara, Jean-Pascal Machiels, Danny Rischin, Tanguy Y. Seiwert, Robert L. Ferris, Ulrich Keilholz, Amanda Psyrri, Bhumsuk Keam, Paolo Bossi, Robert Metcalf, Ching-Yun Hsieh, Paul M.J. Clement, Pavel Isaev, Ali Mudunov, José Dinis, Ann Hoeben, Stefan Kasper, Konrad Klinghammer, Michael Hwang, Jorge Blando, Olivier Serrano, Dario Ruscica, Roger B. Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Treatment options for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and platinum-based chemotherapy are limited. Preliminary data suggested monalizumab plus cetuximab had clinical activity in R/M HNSCC. Participants and methods: INTERLINK-1 (NCT04590963) was a double-blind, phase III study. Participants with R/M HNSCC who had received ICI therapy and progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to monalizumab (750 mg, fortnightly) or placebo, plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose, then 250 mg/m2, weekly). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in participants with non-oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) or human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative OPC (HPV-unrelated analysis set). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: At data cut-off, 216 participants were randomized in the HPV-unrelated analysis set; 145 to monalizumab plus cetuximab and 71 to placebo plus cetuximab. Median OS was 8.8 months for monalizumab plus cetuximab versus 8.6 months for placebo plus cetuximab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.66–1.54); median PFS was 3.6 versus 3.8 months, respectively (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79–1.57); and ORR was 15.2% versus 23.9%, respectively. INTERLINK-1 was terminated after a preplanned interim analysis showed futility criteria were met (predetermined futility HR >0.874). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 18.3% and 17.2% of participants treated in the monalizumab and placebo arms, respectively. Conclusions: Monalizumab plus cetuximab did not improve OS compared with placebo plus cetuximab. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with safety observations for cetuximab monotherapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0073\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
INTERLINK-1: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Monalizumab Plus Cetuximab in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Purpose: Treatment options for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and platinum-based chemotherapy are limited. Preliminary data suggested monalizumab plus cetuximab had clinical activity in R/M HNSCC. Participants and methods: INTERLINK-1 (NCT04590963) was a double-blind, phase III study. Participants with R/M HNSCC who had received ICI therapy and progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to monalizumab (750 mg, fortnightly) or placebo, plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose, then 250 mg/m2, weekly). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in participants with non-oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) or human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative OPC (HPV-unrelated analysis set). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: At data cut-off, 216 participants were randomized in the HPV-unrelated analysis set; 145 to monalizumab plus cetuximab and 71 to placebo plus cetuximab. Median OS was 8.8 months for monalizumab plus cetuximab versus 8.6 months for placebo plus cetuximab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.66–1.54); median PFS was 3.6 versus 3.8 months, respectively (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79–1.57); and ORR was 15.2% versus 23.9%, respectively. INTERLINK-1 was terminated after a preplanned interim analysis showed futility criteria were met (predetermined futility HR >0.874). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 18.3% and 17.2% of participants treated in the monalizumab and placebo arms, respectively. Conclusions: Monalizumab plus cetuximab did not improve OS compared with placebo plus cetuximab. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with safety observations for cetuximab monotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.