Amy S. Clark, Fengmin Zhao, Paula Klein, Alberto J. Montero, Carla Falkson, Elisa Krill-Jackson, Kendrith Rowland, Sagar Sardesai, Jason Incorvati, Patrick Dillon, Antonio C. Wolff, Richard Trauger, Thomas C. Heineman, Matthew C. Coffey, Kathy D. Miller
{"title":"紫杉醇单独或联合Pelareorep联合或不联合Avelumab治疗转移激素受体阳性乳腺癌的II期随机研究:bracet -01/PrE0113研究","authors":"Amy S. Clark, Fengmin Zhao, Paula Klein, Alberto J. Montero, Carla Falkson, Elisa Krill-Jackson, Kendrith Rowland, Sagar Sardesai, Jason Incorvati, Patrick Dillon, Antonio C. Wolff, Richard Trauger, Thomas C. Heineman, Matthew C. Coffey, Kathy D. Miller","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Pelareorep (Pel) is a type 3 oncolytic reovirus that upregulates PD-L1 expression. We determined the objective response rate (ORR) with paclitaxel (Pac), Pac + Pel, or Pac + Pel + avelumab (Ave). Patients and Methods: Patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had progressed on at least one line of endocrine therapy with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor and had not received chemotherapy for MBC were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to Pac, Pac/Pel or Pac/Pel/Ave after a three-patient run-in confirmed safety of the triplet. Response was assessed every 8 weeks until week 16 and then every 12 weeks using RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was 16-week ORR. Statistical comparison across arms was not planned. Results: 48 patients enrolled with 45 randomized, 16-week ORR was 20%, 31% and 14% in the Pac, Pac/Pel and Pac/Pel/Ave arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months (m), 12.1m and 5.8m in the Pac, Pac/Pel and Pac/Pel/Ave arms respectively. There were more adverse events, particularly infusion reactions, in the combination arms than the Pac arm. Expansion of peripheral T cell clones were observed by cycle (C)4 in Pac/Pel but not the Pac or Pac/Pel/Ave arms. Conclusions: The addition of Pel to Pac was associated with increased toxicity, expanded peripheral T-cell clones, and numerically increased ORR and PFS compared to Pac; Pac/Pel/Ave further increased toxicity and blunted T cell responses without obvious increase in efficacy. Investigation of the Pac/Pel combination warrants consideration with careful attention to acute toxicity.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Phase II Randomized Study of Paclitaxel alone or combined with Pelareorep with or without Avelumab in Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: the BRACELET-01/PrE0113 study\",\"authors\":\"Amy S. Clark, Fengmin Zhao, Paula Klein, Alberto J. Montero, Carla Falkson, Elisa Krill-Jackson, Kendrith Rowland, Sagar Sardesai, Jason Incorvati, Patrick Dillon, Antonio C. Wolff, Richard Trauger, Thomas C. Heineman, Matthew C. Coffey, Kathy D. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Pelareorep (Pel) is a type 3 oncolytic reovirus that upregulates PD-L1 expression. We determined the objective response rate (ORR) with paclitaxel (Pac), Pac + Pel, or Pac + Pel + avelumab (Ave). Patients and Methods: Patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had progressed on at least one line of endocrine therapy with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor and had not received chemotherapy for MBC were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to Pac, Pac/Pel or Pac/Pel/Ave after a three-patient run-in confirmed safety of the triplet. Response was assessed every 8 weeks until week 16 and then every 12 weeks using RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was 16-week ORR. Statistical comparison across arms was not planned. Results: 48 patients enrolled with 45 randomized, 16-week ORR was 20%, 31% and 14% in the Pac, Pac/Pel and Pac/Pel/Ave arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months (m), 12.1m and 5.8m in the Pac, Pac/Pel and Pac/Pel/Ave arms respectively. There were more adverse events, particularly infusion reactions, in the combination arms than the Pac arm. Expansion of peripheral T cell clones were observed by cycle (C)4 in Pac/Pel but not the Pac or Pac/Pel/Ave arms. Conclusions: The addition of Pel to Pac was associated with increased toxicity, expanded peripheral T-cell clones, and numerically increased ORR and PFS compared to Pac; Pac/Pel/Ave further increased toxicity and blunted T cell responses without obvious increase in efficacy. Investigation of the Pac/Pel combination warrants consideration with careful attention to acute toxicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2701\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2701","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Phase II Randomized Study of Paclitaxel alone or combined with Pelareorep with or without Avelumab in Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: the BRACELET-01/PrE0113 study
Purpose: Pelareorep (Pel) is a type 3 oncolytic reovirus that upregulates PD-L1 expression. We determined the objective response rate (ORR) with paclitaxel (Pac), Pac + Pel, or Pac + Pel + avelumab (Ave). Patients and Methods: Patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had progressed on at least one line of endocrine therapy with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor and had not received chemotherapy for MBC were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to Pac, Pac/Pel or Pac/Pel/Ave after a three-patient run-in confirmed safety of the triplet. Response was assessed every 8 weeks until week 16 and then every 12 weeks using RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was 16-week ORR. Statistical comparison across arms was not planned. Results: 48 patients enrolled with 45 randomized, 16-week ORR was 20%, 31% and 14% in the Pac, Pac/Pel and Pac/Pel/Ave arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months (m), 12.1m and 5.8m in the Pac, Pac/Pel and Pac/Pel/Ave arms respectively. There were more adverse events, particularly infusion reactions, in the combination arms than the Pac arm. Expansion of peripheral T cell clones were observed by cycle (C)4 in Pac/Pel but not the Pac or Pac/Pel/Ave arms. Conclusions: The addition of Pel to Pac was associated with increased toxicity, expanded peripheral T-cell clones, and numerically increased ORR and PFS compared to Pac; Pac/Pel/Ave further increased toxicity and blunted T cell responses without obvious increase in efficacy. Investigation of the Pac/Pel combination warrants consideration with careful attention to acute toxicity.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.