心理健康护理中生成任务的大型语言模型的范围审查

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yining Hua, Hongbin Na, Zehan Li, Fenglin Liu, Xiao Fang, David Clifton, John Torous
{"title":"心理健康护理中生成任务的大型语言模型的范围审查","authors":"Yining Hua, Hongbin Na, Zehan Li, Fenglin Liu, Xiao Fang, David Clifton, John Torous","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01611-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large language models (LLMs) show promise in mental health care for handling human-like conversations, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This scoping review synthesizes existing research on LLM applications in mental health care, reviews model performance and clinical effectiveness, identifies gaps in current evaluation methods following a structured evaluation framework, and provides recommendations for future development. A systematic search identified 726 unique articles, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. These studies, encompassing applications such as clinical assistance, counseling, therapy, and emotional support, show initial promises. However, the evaluation methods were often non-standardized, with most studies relying on ad-hoc scales that limit comparability and robustness. A reliance on prompt-tuning proprietary models, such as OpenAI’s GPT series, also raises concerns about transparency and reproducibility. As current evidence does not fully support their use as standalone interventions, more rigorous development and evaluation guidelines are needed for safe, effective clinical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of large language models for generative tasks in mental health care\",\"authors\":\"Yining Hua, Hongbin Na, Zehan Li, Fenglin Liu, Xiao Fang, David Clifton, John Torous\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01611-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Large language models (LLMs) show promise in mental health care for handling human-like conversations, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This scoping review synthesizes existing research on LLM applications in mental health care, reviews model performance and clinical effectiveness, identifies gaps in current evaluation methods following a structured evaluation framework, and provides recommendations for future development. A systematic search identified 726 unique articles, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. These studies, encompassing applications such as clinical assistance, counseling, therapy, and emotional support, show initial promises. However, the evaluation methods were often non-standardized, with most studies relying on ad-hoc scales that limit comparability and robustness. A reliance on prompt-tuning proprietary models, such as OpenAI’s GPT series, also raises concerns about transparency and reproducibility. As current evidence does not fully support their use as standalone interventions, more rigorous development and evaluation guidelines are needed for safe, effective clinical integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01611-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01611-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(llm)在精神卫生保健中显示出处理类似人类对话的前景,但其有效性仍不确定。本综述综合了法学硕士在精神卫生保健中的应用的现有研究,回顾了模型的性能和临床有效性,根据结构化的评估框架确定了当前评估方法的差距,并为未来的发展提供了建议。系统检索发现726篇独特的文章,其中16篇符合纳入标准。这些研究,包括临床援助、咨询、治疗和情感支持等应用,显示出初步的希望。然而,评估方法往往是非标准化的,大多数研究依赖于限制可比性和稳健性的特设量表。依赖于即时调整的专有模型,比如OpenAI的GPT系列,也引起了对透明度和可重复性的担忧。由于目前的证据并不完全支持将其作为独立干预措施使用,因此需要更严格的开发和评估指南,以实现安全、有效的临床整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A scoping review of large language models for generative tasks in mental health care

A scoping review of large language models for generative tasks in mental health care

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in mental health care for handling human-like conversations, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This scoping review synthesizes existing research on LLM applications in mental health care, reviews model performance and clinical effectiveness, identifies gaps in current evaluation methods following a structured evaluation framework, and provides recommendations for future development. A systematic search identified 726 unique articles, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. These studies, encompassing applications such as clinical assistance, counseling, therapy, and emotional support, show initial promises. However, the evaluation methods were often non-standardized, with most studies relying on ad-hoc scales that limit comparability and robustness. A reliance on prompt-tuning proprietary models, such as OpenAI’s GPT series, also raises concerns about transparency and reproducibility. As current evidence does not fully support their use as standalone interventions, more rigorous development and evaluation guidelines are needed for safe, effective clinical integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信