一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验,比较THA直接上入路与后入路。

Babar Kayani,Sujith Konan,Jenni Tahmassebi,Dia Giebaly,Fares Sami Haddad
{"title":"一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验,比较THA直接上入路与后入路。","authors":"Babar Kayani,Sujith Konan,Jenni Tahmassebi,Dia Giebaly,Fares Sami Haddad","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe direct superior approach (DSA) is a modification of the posterior approach (PA) that is intended to preserve the iliotibial band and short external rotators, except for the piriformis and conjoined tendon, during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores between patients undergoing the DSA versus the PA for THA.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis study included 80 patients with symptomatic hip arthritis undergoing primary THA. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either the DSA or PA for THA. Surgery was undertaken using identical implant designs in both groups, and all patients underwent a standardized postoperative rehabilitation program. Predefined study outcomes were recorded by blinded observers at regular intervals for 2 years after THA.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPatients in the PA and DSA groups had comparable baseline characteristics for age (mean and standard deviation, 67.3 ± 7.4 and 67.8 ± 7.8 years, respectively; p = 0.962), sex (26 male and 14 female patients, and 21 male and 19 female patients, respectively; p = 0.499) and body mass index (29.0 ± 4.3 and 29.1 ± 5.3 kg/m2; respectively; p = 0.298). There was no significant difference between the PA and DSA groups with respect to postoperative pain scores at 24 hours as assessed using the visual analogue scale (4.5 ± 1.2 and 4.2 ± 2.0, respectively; p = 0.312). The overall time to hospital discharge was 43.6 ± 9.7 hours in the PA group and 45.4 ± 8.9 hours in the DSA group. Two patients in the PA group and 1 in the DSA group developed superficial wound infections, which were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. There were no further complications or harm sustained by patients in either treatment group.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study showed that the intended benefits of the DSA in preserving the iliotibial band and the short external rotators, except for the piriformis and conjoined tendon, did not translate to any difference in postoperative pain scores when compared with the PA for THA.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Direct Superior Approach Versus the Posterior Approach for THA.\",\"authors\":\"Babar Kayani,Sujith Konan,Jenni Tahmassebi,Dia Giebaly,Fares Sami Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/jbjs.24.00830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe direct superior approach (DSA) is a modification of the posterior approach (PA) that is intended to preserve the iliotibial band and short external rotators, except for the piriformis and conjoined tendon, during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores between patients undergoing the DSA versus the PA for THA.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis study included 80 patients with symptomatic hip arthritis undergoing primary THA. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either the DSA or PA for THA. Surgery was undertaken using identical implant designs in both groups, and all patients underwent a standardized postoperative rehabilitation program. Predefined study outcomes were recorded by blinded observers at regular intervals for 2 years after THA.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nPatients in the PA and DSA groups had comparable baseline characteristics for age (mean and standard deviation, 67.3 ± 7.4 and 67.8 ± 7.8 years, respectively; p = 0.962), sex (26 male and 14 female patients, and 21 male and 19 female patients, respectively; p = 0.499) and body mass index (29.0 ± 4.3 and 29.1 ± 5.3 kg/m2; respectively; p = 0.298). There was no significant difference between the PA and DSA groups with respect to postoperative pain scores at 24 hours as assessed using the visual analogue scale (4.5 ± 1.2 and 4.2 ± 2.0, respectively; p = 0.312). The overall time to hospital discharge was 43.6 ± 9.7 hours in the PA group and 45.4 ± 8.9 hours in the DSA group. Two patients in the PA group and 1 in the DSA group developed superficial wound infections, which were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. There were no further complications or harm sustained by patients in either treatment group.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis study showed that the intended benefits of the DSA in preserving the iliotibial band and the short external rotators, except for the piriformis and conjoined tendon, did not translate to any difference in postoperative pain scores when compared with the PA for THA.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nTherapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直接上入路(DSA)是对后入路(PA)的改良,目的是在全髋关节置换术(THA)期间保留髂胫束和短外旋肌,除了梨状肌和连体肌腱。本研究的目的是比较接受DSA和PA的THA患者的术后疼痛评分。方法本研究纳入80例行原发性髋关节置换术的症状性髋关节关节炎患者。患者前瞻性随机接受THA的DSA或PA。两组采用相同的种植体设计进行手术,所有患者均接受标准化的术后康复计划。预先确定的研究结果由盲法观察者在THA后2年定期记录。结果PA组和DSA组患者的年龄基线特征相当(平均和标准差分别为67.3±7.4岁和67.8±7.8岁;P = 0.962)、性别(男性26例,女性14例,男性21例,女性19例);P = 0.499)和体重指数(29.0±4.3和29.1±5.3 kg/m2);分别;P = 0.298)。采用视觉模拟评分法,PA组和DSA组术后24小时疼痛评分无显著差异(分别为4.5±1.2和4.2±2.0);P = 0.312)。总出院时间PA组为43.6±9.7小时,DSA组为45.4±8.9小时。PA组2例,DSA组1例发生浅表创面感染,均经口服抗生素治疗成功。两组患者均未出现并发症或损伤。结论:本研究表明,DSA在保留髂胫束和短外旋肌(除梨状肌和连体肌腱外)方面的预期益处,与THA的PA相比,并没有转化为术后疼痛评分的任何差异。证据级别:治疗性i级。参见《作者说明》获得证据级别的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Direct Superior Approach Versus the Posterior Approach for THA.
BACKGROUND The direct superior approach (DSA) is a modification of the posterior approach (PA) that is intended to preserve the iliotibial band and short external rotators, except for the piriformis and conjoined tendon, during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores between patients undergoing the DSA versus the PA for THA. METHODS This study included 80 patients with symptomatic hip arthritis undergoing primary THA. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either the DSA or PA for THA. Surgery was undertaken using identical implant designs in both groups, and all patients underwent a standardized postoperative rehabilitation program. Predefined study outcomes were recorded by blinded observers at regular intervals for 2 years after THA. RESULTS Patients in the PA and DSA groups had comparable baseline characteristics for age (mean and standard deviation, 67.3 ± 7.4 and 67.8 ± 7.8 years, respectively; p = 0.962), sex (26 male and 14 female patients, and 21 male and 19 female patients, respectively; p = 0.499) and body mass index (29.0 ± 4.3 and 29.1 ± 5.3 kg/m2; respectively; p = 0.298). There was no significant difference between the PA and DSA groups with respect to postoperative pain scores at 24 hours as assessed using the visual analogue scale (4.5 ± 1.2 and 4.2 ± 2.0, respectively; p = 0.312). The overall time to hospital discharge was 43.6 ± 9.7 hours in the PA group and 45.4 ± 8.9 hours in the DSA group. Two patients in the PA group and 1 in the DSA group developed superficial wound infections, which were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. There were no further complications or harm sustained by patients in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the intended benefits of the DSA in preserving the iliotibial band and the short external rotators, except for the piriformis and conjoined tendon, did not translate to any difference in postoperative pain scores when compared with the PA for THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信