当前制度化的性别歧视护理学位课堂:在加泰罗尼亚多中心定性研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Maria Feijoo-Cid , Andres Llena-Riu , Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido , Concepció Fuentes-Pumarola , David Cámara-Liebana , Ángel Gasch-Gallén
{"title":"当前制度化的性别歧视护理学位课堂:在加泰罗尼亚多中心定性研究","authors":"Maria Feijoo-Cid ,&nbsp;Andres Llena-Riu ,&nbsp;Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido ,&nbsp;Concepció Fuentes-Pumarola ,&nbsp;David Cámara-Liebana ,&nbsp;Ángel Gasch-Gallén","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Everyday sexism is not always consciously identified in nursing degree classrooms. This leads to the reproduction of inequality that is legitimized in interpersonal relationships and institutional dynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Describe how nursing students perceive and experience everyday sexism in the classroom at various universities in Catalonia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multicenter study using quantitative and qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews. The study population comprised fourth-year nursing students in Catalonia. The interviews were conducted online from February to June 2022. An ad hoc interview script was designed based on the scientific literature on the perception of sexism and discrimination in the classroom. The anonymity and confidentiality of participants and data were ensured.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty fourth-year nursing students participated, 18 women and two men, ages 21 to 49. Use of the space was unequal: men occupy the back rows of the classroom, forming male-only groups. Moreover, men participate more often in large groups when a debate is established, and they do so impulsively. Women are more respectful and ask questions about class content. Male students tend to do less work in group projects but present more. Female students lead the group work, especially in terms of coordination and organization, and take responsibility for the more complex parts. However, they participate less in oral presentations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the nursing classroom, women are invisibilized and limited in their use of space. They also take on excess work but participate less. Men participate more, reject inclusive language, and work together to claim their space. These dynamics create the conditions for a nursing degree education steeped in legitimized everyday sexism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 106760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current institutionalized sexism in nursing degree classrooms: A multicenter qualitative study in Catalonia\",\"authors\":\"Maria Feijoo-Cid ,&nbsp;Andres Llena-Riu ,&nbsp;Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido ,&nbsp;Concepció Fuentes-Pumarola ,&nbsp;David Cámara-Liebana ,&nbsp;Ángel Gasch-Gallén\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Everyday sexism is not always consciously identified in nursing degree classrooms. This leads to the reproduction of inequality that is legitimized in interpersonal relationships and institutional dynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Describe how nursing students perceive and experience everyday sexism in the classroom at various universities in Catalonia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multicenter study using quantitative and qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews. The study population comprised fourth-year nursing students in Catalonia. The interviews were conducted online from February to June 2022. An ad hoc interview script was designed based on the scientific literature on the perception of sexism and discrimination in the classroom. The anonymity and confidentiality of participants and data were ensured.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty fourth-year nursing students participated, 18 women and two men, ages 21 to 49. Use of the space was unequal: men occupy the back rows of the classroom, forming male-only groups. Moreover, men participate more often in large groups when a debate is established, and they do so impulsively. Women are more respectful and ask questions about class content. Male students tend to do less work in group projects but present more. Female students lead the group work, especially in terms of coordination and organization, and take responsibility for the more complex parts. However, they participate less in oral presentations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the nursing classroom, women are invisibilized and limited in their use of space. They also take on excess work but participate less. Men participate more, reject inclusive language, and work together to claim their space. These dynamics create the conditions for a nursing degree education steeped in legitimized everyday sexism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106760\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725001960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725001960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在护理学位课堂上,日常的性别歧视并不总是被有意识地识别出来。这导致了在人际关系和制度动态中合法化的不平等的再生产。目的描述在加泰罗尼亚的不同大学里,护理专业的学生如何在课堂上感知和经历日常的性别歧视。方法采用半结构化访谈,采用多中心研究方法进行定量和定性内容分析。研究人群包括加泰罗尼亚四年级护理专业的学生。这些访谈于2022年2月至6月在网上进行。基于对课堂性别歧视认知的科学文献,设计了一个特别访谈脚本。参与者和数据的匿名性和保密性得到了保证。结果共有24名护生参与,其中女18人,男2人,年龄21 ~ 49岁。空间的使用是不平等的:男性占据了教室的后排,形成了只有男性的小组。此外,当一场辩论形成后,男性会更频繁地参与到大群体中,而且他们这样做是出于冲动。女性更有礼貌,会就课堂内容提问。男生在小组项目中往往做得少,但表现得多。女生领导小组工作,特别是在协调和组织方面,并负责较复杂的部分。然而,他们较少参与口头报告。结论在护理课堂中,女性在空间的利用上存在着隐蔽性和局限性。他们还承担了额外的工作,但参与的时间却更少。男性更多地参与进来,拒绝包容性语言,共同努力争取自己的空间。这些动态为护理学位教育创造了条件,使其充斥着合法的日常性别歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current institutionalized sexism in nursing degree classrooms: A multicenter qualitative study in Catalonia
Everyday sexism is not always consciously identified in nursing degree classrooms. This leads to the reproduction of inequality that is legitimized in interpersonal relationships and institutional dynamics.

Aim

Describe how nursing students perceive and experience everyday sexism in the classroom at various universities in Catalonia.

Methods

Multicenter study using quantitative and qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews. The study population comprised fourth-year nursing students in Catalonia. The interviews were conducted online from February to June 2022. An ad hoc interview script was designed based on the scientific literature on the perception of sexism and discrimination in the classroom. The anonymity and confidentiality of participants and data were ensured.

Results

Twenty fourth-year nursing students participated, 18 women and two men, ages 21 to 49. Use of the space was unequal: men occupy the back rows of the classroom, forming male-only groups. Moreover, men participate more often in large groups when a debate is established, and they do so impulsively. Women are more respectful and ask questions about class content. Male students tend to do less work in group projects but present more. Female students lead the group work, especially in terms of coordination and organization, and take responsibility for the more complex parts. However, they participate less in oral presentations.

Conclusion

In the nursing classroom, women are invisibilized and limited in their use of space. They also take on excess work but participate less. Men participate more, reject inclusive language, and work together to claim their space. These dynamics create the conditions for a nursing degree education steeped in legitimized everyday sexism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信