交易能源系统费用分摊协议的技术评估框架

IF 4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Daniel Galeano-Suárez , David Toquica , Nilson Henao , Kodjo Agbossou , JC Oviedo-Cepeda , Michael Fournier
{"title":"交易能源系统费用分摊协议的技术评估框架","authors":"Daniel Galeano-Suárez ,&nbsp;David Toquica ,&nbsp;Nilson Henao ,&nbsp;Kodjo Agbossou ,&nbsp;JC Oviedo-Cepeda ,&nbsp;Michael Fournier","doi":"10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transactive Energy Systems (TES) brought opportunities to innovate on electricity market designs and improve the economic efficiency and fairness of the grid. Cost-sharing (CS) mechanism designs are appealing in TES since they can provide fair electricity prices when acknowledging average operating costs. However, CS must consider the grid’s physical constraints to ensure the feasibility of transactions and avoid affecting service quality. For this reason, this paper introduces an assessment methodology for TES cost-sharing agreements that incorporates the physical limits of the grid, allocates the total system cost, and reduces information disclosure among participants. The proposed framework utilizes the aggregated consumption of residential customers to determine active and reactive power demands through probabilistic modeling. Subsequently, the expected values of electrical variables are computed through Monte-Carlo simulations of dynamic power flows and summarized in a transactive report. The report serves as an input to allocate penalty costs and modify demand patterns to comply with the grid safety limits. The TES assessment methodology is evaluated using the IEEE 33-bus distribution system. Study results demonstrate that the proposed Transactive Energy market, employing cost-sharing, effectively reduces the expected power consumption peaks. The results also highlight the efficacy of the proposed voltage and congestion penalty cost by encouraging users to shift consumption into safe limits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50630,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Electrical Engineering","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 110356"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical assessment framework for cost-sharing agreements in transactive energy systems\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Galeano-Suárez ,&nbsp;David Toquica ,&nbsp;Nilson Henao ,&nbsp;Kodjo Agbossou ,&nbsp;JC Oviedo-Cepeda ,&nbsp;Michael Fournier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transactive Energy Systems (TES) brought opportunities to innovate on electricity market designs and improve the economic efficiency and fairness of the grid. Cost-sharing (CS) mechanism designs are appealing in TES since they can provide fair electricity prices when acknowledging average operating costs. However, CS must consider the grid’s physical constraints to ensure the feasibility of transactions and avoid affecting service quality. For this reason, this paper introduces an assessment methodology for TES cost-sharing agreements that incorporates the physical limits of the grid, allocates the total system cost, and reduces information disclosure among participants. The proposed framework utilizes the aggregated consumption of residential customers to determine active and reactive power demands through probabilistic modeling. Subsequently, the expected values of electrical variables are computed through Monte-Carlo simulations of dynamic power flows and summarized in a transactive report. The report serves as an input to allocate penalty costs and modify demand patterns to comply with the grid safety limits. The TES assessment methodology is evaluated using the IEEE 33-bus distribution system. Study results demonstrate that the proposed Transactive Energy market, employing cost-sharing, effectively reduces the expected power consumption peaks. The results also highlight the efficacy of the proposed voltage and congestion penalty cost by encouraging users to shift consumption into safe limits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Electrical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Electrical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004579062500299X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004579062500299X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交易能源系统(TES)带来了电力市场设计创新的机会,提高了电网的经济效率和公平性。成本分摊机制的设计在工商业污水附加费系统中很有吸引力,因为它可以在确认平均营运成本的情况下提供公平的电价。但是,CS必须考虑电网的物理约束,以保证交易的可行性,避免影响服务质量。因此,本文介绍了一种纳入电网物理限制、分配系统总成本并减少参与者之间信息披露的TES成本分摊协议的评估方法。提出的框架利用住宅用户的总消费,通过概率建模来确定有功和无功功率需求。随后,通过动态潮流的蒙特卡罗模拟计算电变量的期望值,并将其总结为交互式报告。该报告可作为分配罚款成本和修改需求模式以符合电网安全限制的输入。TES评估方法使用IEEE 33总线分配系统进行评估。研究结果表明,所提出的交易能源市场采用成本分担,有效地降低了预期用电峰值。研究结果还强调了建议的电压和拥堵惩罚成本的有效性,鼓励用户将消耗转移到安全限度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical assessment framework for cost-sharing agreements in transactive energy systems
Transactive Energy Systems (TES) brought opportunities to innovate on electricity market designs and improve the economic efficiency and fairness of the grid. Cost-sharing (CS) mechanism designs are appealing in TES since they can provide fair electricity prices when acknowledging average operating costs. However, CS must consider the grid’s physical constraints to ensure the feasibility of transactions and avoid affecting service quality. For this reason, this paper introduces an assessment methodology for TES cost-sharing agreements that incorporates the physical limits of the grid, allocates the total system cost, and reduces information disclosure among participants. The proposed framework utilizes the aggregated consumption of residential customers to determine active and reactive power demands through probabilistic modeling. Subsequently, the expected values of electrical variables are computed through Monte-Carlo simulations of dynamic power flows and summarized in a transactive report. The report serves as an input to allocate penalty costs and modify demand patterns to comply with the grid safety limits. The TES assessment methodology is evaluated using the IEEE 33-bus distribution system. Study results demonstrate that the proposed Transactive Energy market, employing cost-sharing, effectively reduces the expected power consumption peaks. The results also highlight the efficacy of the proposed voltage and congestion penalty cost by encouraging users to shift consumption into safe limits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Computers & Electrical Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
661
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The impact of computers has nowhere been more revolutionary than in electrical engineering. The design, analysis, and operation of electrical and electronic systems are now dominated by computers, a transformation that has been motivated by the natural ease of interface between computers and electrical systems, and the promise of spectacular improvements in speed and efficiency. Published since 1973, Computers & Electrical Engineering provides rapid publication of topical research into the integration of computer technology and computational techniques with electrical and electronic systems. The journal publishes papers featuring novel implementations of computers and computational techniques in areas like signal and image processing, high-performance computing, parallel processing, and communications. Special attention will be paid to papers describing innovative architectures, algorithms, and software tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信