草地生物群系烧伤疤痕的光学与雷达遥感制图

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Talya R. Molema , Solomon G. Tesfamichael , Emmanuel Fundisi
{"title":"草地生物群系烧伤疤痕的光学与雷达遥感制图","authors":"Talya R. Molema ,&nbsp;Solomon G. Tesfamichael ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Fundisi","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wildfires remain a major ongoing threat to the integrity of the environment and therefore emphasis is placed on employing efficient assessment techniques, such as remote sensing. Grassland fires received lesser attention compared to forest fires, despite their significant contribution to global wildfire occurrences. This study, conducted in South Africa, utilized Sentinel-1 radar and Sentinel-2 optical data to map burn scars in grasslands, in a biome representative of grasslands found elsewhere. Employing the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to classify the data, the study achieved high producer's and user's accuracies in identifying burn scars using optical data (&gt;90 %). Comparison of variable importance showed the infrared as well as vegetation and fuel moisture indices being the most influential variables to the classification. However, radar data produced lower accuracies (&lt;50 %) owing to significant confusion in distinguishing grass, bare land and water bodies since these features have structural compositions similar to burnt areas. Nonetheless, radar data proved effective in differentiating burn scars from shadows. Combining optical and radar data yielded comparable accuracies to the optical-alone data but improved the discrimination between burnt areas and shadows. This discrimination capability also agrees with the importance of radar data that ranked better than the visible bands of the optical data. The benefit of merging optical and radar data underscores the importance of radar data, which remains unaffected by atmospheric interference like smoke, haze and clouds, enabling continuous monitoring even during fire events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101548"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical and radar remote sensing for burn scar mapping in the grassland biome\",\"authors\":\"Talya R. Molema ,&nbsp;Solomon G. Tesfamichael ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Fundisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wildfires remain a major ongoing threat to the integrity of the environment and therefore emphasis is placed on employing efficient assessment techniques, such as remote sensing. Grassland fires received lesser attention compared to forest fires, despite their significant contribution to global wildfire occurrences. This study, conducted in South Africa, utilized Sentinel-1 radar and Sentinel-2 optical data to map burn scars in grasslands, in a biome representative of grasslands found elsewhere. Employing the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to classify the data, the study achieved high producer's and user's accuracies in identifying burn scars using optical data (&gt;90 %). Comparison of variable importance showed the infrared as well as vegetation and fuel moisture indices being the most influential variables to the classification. However, radar data produced lower accuracies (&lt;50 %) owing to significant confusion in distinguishing grass, bare land and water bodies since these features have structural compositions similar to burnt areas. Nonetheless, radar data proved effective in differentiating burn scars from shadows. Combining optical and radar data yielded comparable accuracies to the optical-alone data but improved the discrimination between burnt areas and shadows. This discrimination capability also agrees with the importance of radar data that ranked better than the visible bands of the optical data. The benefit of merging optical and radar data underscores the importance of radar data, which remains unaffected by atmospheric interference like smoke, haze and clouds, enabling continuous monitoring even during fire events.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525001016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525001016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野火仍然是对环境完整性的一个持续的重大威胁,因此重点放在采用有效的评估技术,例如遥感。与森林火灾相比,草原火灾受到的关注较少,尽管它们对全球野火的发生有重要贡献。这项研究在南非进行,利用Sentinel-1雷达和Sentinel-2光学数据来绘制草原上的烧伤疤痕,在其他地方发现的具有代表性的草原生物群落中。利用谷歌Earth Engine (GEE)平台中的随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)算法对数据进行分类,该研究在使用光学数据识别烧伤疤痕方面实现了较高的生产者和用户准确率(> 90%)。变量重要度比较表明,红外、植被和燃料水分指数是对分类影响最大的变量。然而,由于在区分草地、裸地和水体方面存在严重混淆,雷达数据的精度较低(50%),因为这些特征的结构组成与燃烧区域相似。尽管如此,雷达数据证明在区分烧伤疤痕和阴影方面是有效的。光学和雷达数据的结合产生了与单独光学数据相当的精度,但改善了对烧伤区域和阴影的区分。这种识别能力也与雷达数据的重要性相一致,雷达数据的重要性排名高于光学数据的可见波段。合并光学和雷达数据的好处强调了雷达数据的重要性,雷达数据不受烟雾、雾霾和云层等大气干扰的影响,即使在火灾事件中也能进行连续监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optical and radar remote sensing for burn scar mapping in the grassland biome
Wildfires remain a major ongoing threat to the integrity of the environment and therefore emphasis is placed on employing efficient assessment techniques, such as remote sensing. Grassland fires received lesser attention compared to forest fires, despite their significant contribution to global wildfire occurrences. This study, conducted in South Africa, utilized Sentinel-1 radar and Sentinel-2 optical data to map burn scars in grasslands, in a biome representative of grasslands found elsewhere. Employing the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to classify the data, the study achieved high producer's and user's accuracies in identifying burn scars using optical data (>90 %). Comparison of variable importance showed the infrared as well as vegetation and fuel moisture indices being the most influential variables to the classification. However, radar data produced lower accuracies (<50 %) owing to significant confusion in distinguishing grass, bare land and water bodies since these features have structural compositions similar to burnt areas. Nonetheless, radar data proved effective in differentiating burn scars from shadows. Combining optical and radar data yielded comparable accuracies to the optical-alone data but improved the discrimination between burnt areas and shadows. This discrimination capability also agrees with the importance of radar data that ranked better than the visible bands of the optical data. The benefit of merging optical and radar data underscores the importance of radar data, which remains unaffected by atmospheric interference like smoke, haze and clouds, enabling continuous monitoring even during fire events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信