Talya R. Molema , Solomon G. Tesfamichael , Emmanuel Fundisi
{"title":"草地生物群系烧伤疤痕的光学与雷达遥感制图","authors":"Talya R. Molema , Solomon G. Tesfamichael , Emmanuel Fundisi","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wildfires remain a major ongoing threat to the integrity of the environment and therefore emphasis is placed on employing efficient assessment techniques, such as remote sensing. Grassland fires received lesser attention compared to forest fires, despite their significant contribution to global wildfire occurrences. This study, conducted in South Africa, utilized Sentinel-1 radar and Sentinel-2 optical data to map burn scars in grasslands, in a biome representative of grasslands found elsewhere. Employing the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to classify the data, the study achieved high producer's and user's accuracies in identifying burn scars using optical data (>90 %). Comparison of variable importance showed the infrared as well as vegetation and fuel moisture indices being the most influential variables to the classification. However, radar data produced lower accuracies (<50 %) owing to significant confusion in distinguishing grass, bare land and water bodies since these features have structural compositions similar to burnt areas. Nonetheless, radar data proved effective in differentiating burn scars from shadows. Combining optical and radar data yielded comparable accuracies to the optical-alone data but improved the discrimination between burnt areas and shadows. This discrimination capability also agrees with the importance of radar data that ranked better than the visible bands of the optical data. The benefit of merging optical and radar data underscores the importance of radar data, which remains unaffected by atmospheric interference like smoke, haze and clouds, enabling continuous monitoring even during fire events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101548"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical and radar remote sensing for burn scar mapping in the grassland biome\",\"authors\":\"Talya R. Molema , Solomon G. Tesfamichael , Emmanuel Fundisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wildfires remain a major ongoing threat to the integrity of the environment and therefore emphasis is placed on employing efficient assessment techniques, such as remote sensing. Grassland fires received lesser attention compared to forest fires, despite their significant contribution to global wildfire occurrences. This study, conducted in South Africa, utilized Sentinel-1 radar and Sentinel-2 optical data to map burn scars in grasslands, in a biome representative of grasslands found elsewhere. Employing the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to classify the data, the study achieved high producer's and user's accuracies in identifying burn scars using optical data (>90 %). Comparison of variable importance showed the infrared as well as vegetation and fuel moisture indices being the most influential variables to the classification. However, radar data produced lower accuracies (<50 %) owing to significant confusion in distinguishing grass, bare land and water bodies since these features have structural compositions similar to burnt areas. Nonetheless, radar data proved effective in differentiating burn scars from shadows. Combining optical and radar data yielded comparable accuracies to the optical-alone data but improved the discrimination between burnt areas and shadows. This discrimination capability also agrees with the importance of radar data that ranked better than the visible bands of the optical data. The benefit of merging optical and radar data underscores the importance of radar data, which remains unaffected by atmospheric interference like smoke, haze and clouds, enabling continuous monitoring even during fire events.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525001016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525001016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optical and radar remote sensing for burn scar mapping in the grassland biome
Wildfires remain a major ongoing threat to the integrity of the environment and therefore emphasis is placed on employing efficient assessment techniques, such as remote sensing. Grassland fires received lesser attention compared to forest fires, despite their significant contribution to global wildfire occurrences. This study, conducted in South Africa, utilized Sentinel-1 radar and Sentinel-2 optical data to map burn scars in grasslands, in a biome representative of grasslands found elsewhere. Employing the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to classify the data, the study achieved high producer's and user's accuracies in identifying burn scars using optical data (>90 %). Comparison of variable importance showed the infrared as well as vegetation and fuel moisture indices being the most influential variables to the classification. However, radar data produced lower accuracies (<50 %) owing to significant confusion in distinguishing grass, bare land and water bodies since these features have structural compositions similar to burnt areas. Nonetheless, radar data proved effective in differentiating burn scars from shadows. Combining optical and radar data yielded comparable accuracies to the optical-alone data but improved the discrimination between burnt areas and shadows. This discrimination capability also agrees with the importance of radar data that ranked better than the visible bands of the optical data. The benefit of merging optical and radar data underscores the importance of radar data, which remains unaffected by atmospheric interference like smoke, haze and clouds, enabling continuous monitoring even during fire events.
期刊介绍:
The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems