Donna L. Fitzgerald, Stefan Peters, Amelia Hurren, Gunnar Keppel
{"title":"澳大利亚桉树植被遥感评价系统综述","authors":"Donna L. Fitzgerald, Stefan Peters, Amelia Hurren, Gunnar Keppel","doi":"10.1111/aec.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rapid advancements in remote sensing increasingly allow assessing vegetation at the landscape, local and individual scales. This systematic review investigates the diverse applications of remote sensing for assessing vegetation in eucalypt forests and woodlands within Australia. Of the 137 studies included in the review, two-thirds investigated vegetation conditions, including the effects of dieback and fire, with the remaining articles focusing on vegetation classification and structural vegetation properties. This focus on vegetation conditions highlights the potential of remote sensing to contribute to the monitoring and conservation of biodiversity, suggesting that remote sensing will become more important as the impacts of climate change intensify. Currently, the application of remote sensing methods for investigating eucalypt vegetation remains underutilised. For example, remote regions, including areas of high biodiversity, are generally poorly studied, highlighting major gaps in spatial coverage. Furthermore, study locations are often reported in insufficient detail to facilitate independent verification and reproducibility, reducing the usefulness of existing studies. A key challenge in remote sensing is the identification of an appropriate approach based on the research question and the resources available and we provide guidance with that. Reviewed studies predominantly used freely available imagery (e.g., Landsat and Sentinel), whilst high-resolution commercial imagery (e.g., WorldView) and research-accessible datasets (e.g., PlanetScope) remain little utilised. Emerging technologies like LiDAR, UAVs and hyperspectral imaging that could provide insights at higher resolutions require greater resources for data collection and processing and are yet to be widely integrated into vegetation assessment. To address these challenges, interdisciplinary collaboration among vegetation and remote sensing specialists, and a framework for selecting appropriate remote sensing methods based on research and resources, are critical. Such efforts would help align study objectives with appropriate tools and resources and will be crucial to achieving biodiversity and climate adaptation goals in Australia and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vegetation Assessment Using Remote Sensing: A Systematic Review for Eucalypts in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Donna L. Fitzgerald, Stefan Peters, Amelia Hurren, Gunnar Keppel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rapid advancements in remote sensing increasingly allow assessing vegetation at the landscape, local and individual scales. This systematic review investigates the diverse applications of remote sensing for assessing vegetation in eucalypt forests and woodlands within Australia. Of the 137 studies included in the review, two-thirds investigated vegetation conditions, including the effects of dieback and fire, with the remaining articles focusing on vegetation classification and structural vegetation properties. This focus on vegetation conditions highlights the potential of remote sensing to contribute to the monitoring and conservation of biodiversity, suggesting that remote sensing will become more important as the impacts of climate change intensify. Currently, the application of remote sensing methods for investigating eucalypt vegetation remains underutilised. For example, remote regions, including areas of high biodiversity, are generally poorly studied, highlighting major gaps in spatial coverage. Furthermore, study locations are often reported in insufficient detail to facilitate independent verification and reproducibility, reducing the usefulness of existing studies. A key challenge in remote sensing is the identification of an appropriate approach based on the research question and the resources available and we provide guidance with that. Reviewed studies predominantly used freely available imagery (e.g., Landsat and Sentinel), whilst high-resolution commercial imagery (e.g., WorldView) and research-accessible datasets (e.g., PlanetScope) remain little utilised. Emerging technologies like LiDAR, UAVs and hyperspectral imaging that could provide insights at higher resolutions require greater resources for data collection and processing and are yet to be widely integrated into vegetation assessment. To address these challenges, interdisciplinary collaboration among vegetation and remote sensing specialists, and a framework for selecting appropriate remote sensing methods based on research and resources, are critical. Such efforts would help align study objectives with appropriate tools and resources and will be crucial to achieving biodiversity and climate adaptation goals in Australia and beyond.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70061\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vegetation Assessment Using Remote Sensing: A Systematic Review for Eucalypts in Australia
Rapid advancements in remote sensing increasingly allow assessing vegetation at the landscape, local and individual scales. This systematic review investigates the diverse applications of remote sensing for assessing vegetation in eucalypt forests and woodlands within Australia. Of the 137 studies included in the review, two-thirds investigated vegetation conditions, including the effects of dieback and fire, with the remaining articles focusing on vegetation classification and structural vegetation properties. This focus on vegetation conditions highlights the potential of remote sensing to contribute to the monitoring and conservation of biodiversity, suggesting that remote sensing will become more important as the impacts of climate change intensify. Currently, the application of remote sensing methods for investigating eucalypt vegetation remains underutilised. For example, remote regions, including areas of high biodiversity, are generally poorly studied, highlighting major gaps in spatial coverage. Furthermore, study locations are often reported in insufficient detail to facilitate independent verification and reproducibility, reducing the usefulness of existing studies. A key challenge in remote sensing is the identification of an appropriate approach based on the research question and the resources available and we provide guidance with that. Reviewed studies predominantly used freely available imagery (e.g., Landsat and Sentinel), whilst high-resolution commercial imagery (e.g., WorldView) and research-accessible datasets (e.g., PlanetScope) remain little utilised. Emerging technologies like LiDAR, UAVs and hyperspectral imaging that could provide insights at higher resolutions require greater resources for data collection and processing and are yet to be widely integrated into vegetation assessment. To address these challenges, interdisciplinary collaboration among vegetation and remote sensing specialists, and a framework for selecting appropriate remote sensing methods based on research and resources, are critical. Such efforts would help align study objectives with appropriate tools and resources and will be crucial to achieving biodiversity and climate adaptation goals in Australia and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere.
Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region.
Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.