人工智能在肩部肌肉骨骼疾病管理中的应用:系统综述

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Umile Giuseppe Longo, Martina Marino, Guido Nicodemi, Matteo Giuseppe Pisani, Jacob F. Oeding, Christophe Ley, Rocco Papalia, Kristian Samuelsson
{"title":"人工智能在肩部肌肉骨骼疾病管理中的应用:系统综述","authors":"Umile Giuseppe Longo,&nbsp;Martina Marino,&nbsp;Guido Nicodemi,&nbsp;Matteo Giuseppe Pisani,&nbsp;Jacob F. Oeding,&nbsp;Christophe Ley,&nbsp;Rocco Papalia,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the present review is to evaluate and report on the available literature discussing artificial intelligence (AI) applications to the diagnosis of shoulder conditions, outcome prediction of shoulder interventions, and the possible application of such algorithms directly to surgical procedures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In February 2024, a search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed. Studies had to evaluate AI model effectiveness for inclusion. Research on healthcare cost predictions, deterministic algorithms, patient satisfaction, protocol studies and upper-extremity fractures not involving the shoulder were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools were used to assess bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. Seven studies analysed the detection of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in magnetic resonance imaging and found area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.812 to 0.94 for the detection of RCTs. One study reported Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics values ranging from 0.79 to 0.97 for the prediction of clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In terms of outcomes of rotator cuff repair, an AUC value ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 was reported for prediction of patient-reported outcome measures, and an AUC range of 0.87–0.92 was found for prediction of retear rate. Five studies evaluated the identification of shoulder implant models following TSA from radiographs, with reported accuracy ranging from 89.90% to 97.20%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AI application enables forecasting of clinical outcomes, permits refined diagnostic evaluation and increases surgical accuracy. While promising, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice requires careful consideration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70248","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence applications in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Umile Giuseppe Longo,&nbsp;Martina Marino,&nbsp;Guido Nicodemi,&nbsp;Matteo Giuseppe Pisani,&nbsp;Jacob F. Oeding,&nbsp;Christophe Ley,&nbsp;Rocco Papalia,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of the present review is to evaluate and report on the available literature discussing artificial intelligence (AI) applications to the diagnosis of shoulder conditions, outcome prediction of shoulder interventions, and the possible application of such algorithms directly to surgical procedures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In February 2024, a search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed. Studies had to evaluate AI model effectiveness for inclusion. Research on healthcare cost predictions, deterministic algorithms, patient satisfaction, protocol studies and upper-extremity fractures not involving the shoulder were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools were used to assess bias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. Seven studies analysed the detection of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in magnetic resonance imaging and found area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.812 to 0.94 for the detection of RCTs. One study reported Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics values ranging from 0.79 to 0.97 for the prediction of clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In terms of outcomes of rotator cuff repair, an AUC value ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 was reported for prediction of patient-reported outcome measures, and an AUC range of 0.87–0.92 was found for prediction of retear rate. Five studies evaluated the identification of shoulder implant models following TSA from radiographs, with reported accuracy ranging from 89.90% to 97.20%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>AI application enables forecasting of clinical outcomes, permits refined diagnostic evaluation and increases surgical accuracy. While promising, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice requires careful consideration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level IV.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70248\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述的目的是评估和报告现有文献,讨论人工智能(AI)在肩关节疾病诊断、肩关节干预结果预测以及此类算法直接应用于外科手术中的可能性。方法于2024年2月检索PubMed、Cochrane和Scopus数据库。研究必须评估人工智能模型的有效性。排除了医疗成本预测、确定性算法、患者满意度、方案研究和不涉及肩部的上肢骨折的研究。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具和非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险工具来评估偏倚。结果共纳入33项研究。7项研究分析了磁共振成像检测肩袖撕裂(rct),发现rct检测的曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.812 ~ 0.94。一项研究报告了用于预测反向全肩关节置换术后临床结果的受者操作特征下面积值范围为0.79至0.97。就肩袖修复的结果而言,预测患者报告的结果测量值的AUC范围为0.58至0.68,预测再撕裂率的AUC范围为0.87至0.92。五项研究评估了TSA后肩关节植入物模型的x线片识别,准确度为89.90%至97.20%。结论人工智能的应用可以预测临床结果,允许精确的诊断评估,提高手术的准确性。虽然这些技术很有前景,但将其转化为常规临床实践需要仔细考虑。证据等级四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence applications in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review

Artificial intelligence applications in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review

Purpose

The aim of the present review is to evaluate and report on the available literature discussing artificial intelligence (AI) applications to the diagnosis of shoulder conditions, outcome prediction of shoulder interventions, and the possible application of such algorithms directly to surgical procedures.

Methods

In February 2024, a search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed. Studies had to evaluate AI model effectiveness for inclusion. Research on healthcare cost predictions, deterministic algorithms, patient satisfaction, protocol studies and upper-extremity fractures not involving the shoulder were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools were used to assess bias.

Results

Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. Seven studies analysed the detection of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in magnetic resonance imaging and found area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.812 to 0.94 for the detection of RCTs. One study reported Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics values ranging from 0.79 to 0.97 for the prediction of clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In terms of outcomes of rotator cuff repair, an AUC value ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 was reported for prediction of patient-reported outcome measures, and an AUC range of 0.87–0.92 was found for prediction of retear rate. Five studies evaluated the identification of shoulder implant models following TSA from radiographs, with reported accuracy ranging from 89.90% to 97.20%.

Conclusion

AI application enables forecasting of clinical outcomes, permits refined diagnostic evaluation and increases surgical accuracy. While promising, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice requires careful consideration.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信