{"title":"与标准治疗方案相比,孕妇和育儿人群的综合治疗方案支持更长时间的滞留:一项基于人群的队列研究","authors":"Karen Urbanoski , Tomisin Iwajomo , Tara Gomes , Claire de Oliveira , Karen Milligan","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrated treatment programs for pregnant and parenting people seek to provide wrap-around services and supports to overcome the barriers and constraints associated with the gendered contexts of substance use and help-seeking. We investigated retention in outpatient treatment among pregnant people and mothers, comparing integrated treatment programs with standard treatment programs in Ontario, Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of females (<em>n</em> = 4440) admitted to 11 integrated treatment programs (cases) and 10 standard treatment programs (controls) between 2008 and 2015. Data sources included linked administrative health data merged with primary data on program characteristics. Exposure was program type and outcomes included days in treatment and number of visits. Multi-level negative binomial regression estimated the effects of program type on retention measures, controlling for individual- and program-level covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Relative to standard treatment, integrated treatment programs offered more services in-house or through partnerships, with specific advantages around the availability of prenatal or primary care and child-minding. Controlling for individual- and program-level covariates, individuals in integrated treatment programs spent more days in treatment (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 5.41, 95 % CI 4.10–7.13) and had more visits (aIRR = 5.18, 95 % CI 4.305–6.23) than did controls in standard treatment programs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study contributes to a growing body of evidence on the implementation and effectiveness of wrap-around comprehensive service models, or integrated treatment programs, designed for pregnant and parenting people who use substances. Integrated treatment models constitute a promising approach to supporting families affected by substance use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 209701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated treatment programs for pregnant and parenting people support longer retention compared to standard treatment programs: A population-based cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Karen Urbanoski , Tomisin Iwajomo , Tara Gomes , Claire de Oliveira , Karen Milligan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrated treatment programs for pregnant and parenting people seek to provide wrap-around services and supports to overcome the barriers and constraints associated with the gendered contexts of substance use and help-seeking. We investigated retention in outpatient treatment among pregnant people and mothers, comparing integrated treatment programs with standard treatment programs in Ontario, Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of females (<em>n</em> = 4440) admitted to 11 integrated treatment programs (cases) and 10 standard treatment programs (controls) between 2008 and 2015. Data sources included linked administrative health data merged with primary data on program characteristics. Exposure was program type and outcomes included days in treatment and number of visits. Multi-level negative binomial regression estimated the effects of program type on retention measures, controlling for individual- and program-level covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Relative to standard treatment, integrated treatment programs offered more services in-house or through partnerships, with specific advantages around the availability of prenatal or primary care and child-minding. Controlling for individual- and program-level covariates, individuals in integrated treatment programs spent more days in treatment (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 5.41, 95 % CI 4.10–7.13) and had more visits (aIRR = 5.18, 95 % CI 4.305–6.23) than did controls in standard treatment programs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study contributes to a growing body of evidence on the implementation and effectiveness of wrap-around comprehensive service models, or integrated treatment programs, designed for pregnant and parenting people who use substances. Integrated treatment models constitute a promising approach to supporting families affected by substance use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209701\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:针对孕妇和育儿人员的综合治疗方案寻求提供全面的服务和支持,以克服与药物使用和寻求帮助的性别背景相关的障碍和制约。我们调查了孕妇和母亲在门诊治疗中的滞留情况,比较了加拿大安大略省的综合治疗方案和标准治疗方案。方法对2008 - 2015年间11个综合治疗方案(病例)和10个标准治疗方案(对照)的女性(n = 4440)进行基于人群的回顾性队列研究。数据源包括与项目特点的主要数据合并的关联管理健康数据。暴露是指项目类型,结果包括治疗天数和就诊次数。多级负二项回归估计了节目类型对保留措施的影响,控制了个人和节目水平的协变量。结果与标准治疗相比,综合治疗方案提供了更多的内部服务或通过合作提供的服务,在产前或初级保健和儿童看护方面具有特殊优势。控制个体和项目水平的协变量,综合治疗方案中的个体比标准治疗方案中的对照组治疗时间更长(校正发病率比[aIRR] = 5.41, 95% CI 4.10-7.13),就诊次数更多(aIRR = 5.18, 95% CI 4.305-6.23)。结论:这项研究提供了越来越多的证据,证明了为孕妇和有子女使用药物的人设计的一揽子综合服务模式或综合治疗方案的实施和有效性。综合治疗模式是支持受药物使用影响的家庭的一种有希望的方法。
Integrated treatment programs for pregnant and parenting people support longer retention compared to standard treatment programs: A population-based cohort study
Background
Integrated treatment programs for pregnant and parenting people seek to provide wrap-around services and supports to overcome the barriers and constraints associated with the gendered contexts of substance use and help-seeking. We investigated retention in outpatient treatment among pregnant people and mothers, comparing integrated treatment programs with standard treatment programs in Ontario, Canada.
Methods
We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of females (n = 4440) admitted to 11 integrated treatment programs (cases) and 10 standard treatment programs (controls) between 2008 and 2015. Data sources included linked administrative health data merged with primary data on program characteristics. Exposure was program type and outcomes included days in treatment and number of visits. Multi-level negative binomial regression estimated the effects of program type on retention measures, controlling for individual- and program-level covariates.
Results
Relative to standard treatment, integrated treatment programs offered more services in-house or through partnerships, with specific advantages around the availability of prenatal or primary care and child-minding. Controlling for individual- and program-level covariates, individuals in integrated treatment programs spent more days in treatment (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 5.41, 95 % CI 4.10–7.13) and had more visits (aIRR = 5.18, 95 % CI 4.305–6.23) than did controls in standard treatment programs.
Conclusions
This study contributes to a growing body of evidence on the implementation and effectiveness of wrap-around comprehensive service models, or integrated treatment programs, designed for pregnant and parenting people who use substances. Integrated treatment models constitute a promising approach to supporting families affected by substance use.