基于余弦相似度的软件可靠性增长模型优化选择方法

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Jinyong Wang , Ce Zhang
{"title":"基于余弦相似度的软件可靠性增长模型优化选择方法","authors":"Jinyong Wang ,&nbsp;Ce Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>So far, there have been many different software reliability growth models (SRGMs) established. It is difficult to choose which SRGM to apply in the reliability evaluation of actual software projects due to the varying assumptions of the established SRGM. In general, there will be considerable discrepancies between SRGMs used for fault prediction and software reliability evaluation of the same software development project. Considering the complexity of the actual software testing process, selecting a single optimal SRGM to evaluate software reliability may not be in line with the actual situation of fault detection (FD) or fault introduction (FI) during software testing. In order to select a class of appropriate SRGMs for the current software development and testing environment in the actual software project reliability evaluation, this paper proposes using the cosine similarity classification method. The purpose of this study is to explore effective methods for dividing into a class of optimal models, rather than selecting an optimal model. In comparison to the classical distance based approach (DBA) for selecting a single optimal SRGM, the proposed method can effectively partition a class of optimal models, including a single optimal model selected by DBA. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 112474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization selection method for software reliability growth model based on cosine similarity\",\"authors\":\"Jinyong Wang ,&nbsp;Ce Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>So far, there have been many different software reliability growth models (SRGMs) established. It is difficult to choose which SRGM to apply in the reliability evaluation of actual software projects due to the varying assumptions of the established SRGM. In general, there will be considerable discrepancies between SRGMs used for fault prediction and software reliability evaluation of the same software development project. Considering the complexity of the actual software testing process, selecting a single optimal SRGM to evaluate software reliability may not be in line with the actual situation of fault detection (FD) or fault introduction (FI) during software testing. In order to select a class of appropriate SRGMs for the current software development and testing environment in the actual software project reliability evaluation, this paper proposes using the cosine similarity classification method. The purpose of this study is to explore effective methods for dividing into a class of optimal models, rather than selecting an optimal model. In comparison to the classical distance based approach (DBA) for selecting a single optimal SRGM, the proposed method can effectively partition a class of optimal models, including a single optimal model selected by DBA. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225001426\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225001426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

到目前为止,已经建立了许多不同的软件可靠性增长模型(srgm)。在实际软件项目的可靠性评估中,由于所建立的SRGM的假设不同,很难选择应用哪种SRGM。通常,在同一个软件开发项目中,用于故障预测和软件可靠性评估的srgm之间会存在相当大的差异。考虑到实际软件测试过程的复杂性,选择单一的最优SRGM来评估软件可靠性可能不符合软件测试过程中故障检测(FD)或故障引入(FI)的实际情况。为了在实际的软件项目可靠性评估中选择适合当前软件开发和测试环境的srgm,本文提出使用余弦相似度分类方法。本研究的目的是探索划分一类最优模型的有效方法,而不是选择一个最优模型。与传统的基于距离的方法(DBA)选择单个最优SRGM相比,该方法可以有效地划分一类最优模型,包括DBA选择的单个最优模型。实验结果证明了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization selection method for software reliability growth model based on cosine similarity
So far, there have been many different software reliability growth models (SRGMs) established. It is difficult to choose which SRGM to apply in the reliability evaluation of actual software projects due to the varying assumptions of the established SRGM. In general, there will be considerable discrepancies between SRGMs used for fault prediction and software reliability evaluation of the same software development project. Considering the complexity of the actual software testing process, selecting a single optimal SRGM to evaluate software reliability may not be in line with the actual situation of fault detection (FD) or fault introduction (FI) during software testing. In order to select a class of appropriate SRGMs for the current software development and testing environment in the actual software project reliability evaluation, this paper proposes using the cosine similarity classification method. The purpose of this study is to explore effective methods for dividing into a class of optimal models, rather than selecting an optimal model. In comparison to the classical distance based approach (DBA) for selecting a single optimal SRGM, the proposed method can effectively partition a class of optimal models, including a single optimal model selected by DBA. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信