20世纪中期儿童机构中导致“隐性”儿童性虐待的工作做法:对当代的教训

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Jan Mason , Tobia Fattore , Justine O’Sullivan
{"title":"20世纪中期儿童机构中导致“隐性”儿童性虐待的工作做法:对当代的教训","authors":"Jan Mason ,&nbsp;Tobia Fattore ,&nbsp;Justine O’Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017) indicated the prevalence of sexual abuse of children in institutional settings, documenting the devastating effects of such abuse on victims, families and communities. This article reports on research that aimed to understand organisational practices and conditions within some New South Wales ‘state institutions’ in which child abuse occurred, during the period from the 1950 s to early 1970 s − the period that was the focus of the Commission’s Inquiry into these institutions. Our article is derived from in-depth interviews with professional practitioners employed by the NSW Child Welfare Department during this time, to work with committed children. The subordinate position of these professionals placed them ‘in the middle’ − between institutional staff and children. The over-arching theme identified by interviewees was their concern that they must have worn ‘blinkers’ when working in the institutions in the mid-twentieth century. We elaborate on this theme in discussion of four sub-themes:1) A masculinist, authoritarian agenda operating to control both children and staff; 2)The shaping of ‘model citizens’ through relations of violence; 3) Subjugation of an alternative discourse; and 4) Mistrust between professionals and inmates. We consider our analysis has particular value in the questions it enables us to ask about contemporary child welfare and juvenile justice practices – our ultimate aim being to inform contemporary policies for preventing institutional child abuse.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 108300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work practices contributing to ‘hidden’ child sexual abuses in mid-twentieth century child institutions: Lessons for contemporary times\",\"authors\":\"Jan Mason ,&nbsp;Tobia Fattore ,&nbsp;Justine O’Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017) indicated the prevalence of sexual abuse of children in institutional settings, documenting the devastating effects of such abuse on victims, families and communities. This article reports on research that aimed to understand organisational practices and conditions within some New South Wales ‘state institutions’ in which child abuse occurred, during the period from the 1950 s to early 1970 s − the period that was the focus of the Commission’s Inquiry into these institutions. Our article is derived from in-depth interviews with professional practitioners employed by the NSW Child Welfare Department during this time, to work with committed children. The subordinate position of these professionals placed them ‘in the middle’ − between institutional staff and children. The over-arching theme identified by interviewees was their concern that they must have worn ‘blinkers’ when working in the institutions in the mid-twentieth century. We elaborate on this theme in discussion of four sub-themes:1) A masculinist, authoritarian agenda operating to control both children and staff; 2)The shaping of ‘model citizens’ through relations of violence; 3) Subjugation of an alternative discourse; and 4) Mistrust between professionals and inmates. We consider our analysis has particular value in the questions it enables us to ask about contemporary child welfare and juvenile justice practices – our ultimate aim being to inform contemporary policies for preventing institutional child abuse.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925001835\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925001835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《机构应对儿童性虐待皇家委员会》(2017年)指出,机构环境中儿童性虐待普遍存在,记录了这种虐待对受害者、家庭和社区的破坏性影响。本文报告了一项研究,旨在了解1950年代至1970年代初发生虐待儿童事件的新南威尔士州一些“州立机构”的组织做法和情况,这一时期是委员会对这些机构进行调查的重点。我们的文章来源于对新南威尔士州儿童福利部门在此期间雇佣的专业从业人员的深入采访,这些从业人员与有义务的儿童一起工作。这些专业人员的从属地位使他们“处于中间”,处于机构工作人员和儿童之间。受访者确定的首要主题是他们担心自己在20世纪中期在机构工作时一定戴着“眼罩”。我们通过讨论四个副主题来详细阐述这一主题:1)一个男性主义的、专制的议程,旨在控制儿童和员工;2)通过暴力关系塑造“模范公民”;3)征服另一种话语;4)专业人员和犯人之间的不信任。我们认为,我们的分析在它使我们能够提出有关当代儿童福利和少年司法实践的问题方面具有特别的价值-我们的最终目标是为防止机构虐待儿童的当代政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work practices contributing to ‘hidden’ child sexual abuses in mid-twentieth century child institutions: Lessons for contemporary times
The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017) indicated the prevalence of sexual abuse of children in institutional settings, documenting the devastating effects of such abuse on victims, families and communities. This article reports on research that aimed to understand organisational practices and conditions within some New South Wales ‘state institutions’ in which child abuse occurred, during the period from the 1950 s to early 1970 s − the period that was the focus of the Commission’s Inquiry into these institutions. Our article is derived from in-depth interviews with professional practitioners employed by the NSW Child Welfare Department during this time, to work with committed children. The subordinate position of these professionals placed them ‘in the middle’ − between institutional staff and children. The over-arching theme identified by interviewees was their concern that they must have worn ‘blinkers’ when working in the institutions in the mid-twentieth century. We elaborate on this theme in discussion of four sub-themes:1) A masculinist, authoritarian agenda operating to control both children and staff; 2)The shaping of ‘model citizens’ through relations of violence; 3) Subjugation of an alternative discourse; and 4) Mistrust between professionals and inmates. We consider our analysis has particular value in the questions it enables us to ask about contemporary child welfare and juvenile justice practices – our ultimate aim being to inform contemporary policies for preventing institutional child abuse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信