Joanes Lameirinhas, Arantxa Gorostiaga, Igone Etxeberria
{"title":"制定和验证多维脆弱性量表:初步阶段","authors":"Joanes Lameirinhas, Arantxa Gorostiaga, Igone Etxeberria","doi":"10.1016/j.regg.2025.101674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Although various instruments have been developed to assess frailty, they generally do not cover all its dimensions and have not demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to develop the Multidimensional Frailty Scale, originally called the <em>Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional</em> (EFM), to assess the physical, cognitive, affective, social, and environmental dimensions of frailty in individuals aged 65 and over and to conduct the initial phases of the validation process. This was carried out over the course of three sequential studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A series of items were developed for each dimension and then evaluated by a panel of 13 experts. Subsequently, cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 23 older adults to examine the response processes. Finally, a pilot study was performed with a sample of 50 individuals aged between 65 and 98 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The panel of experts awarded the items a mean appropriateness rating of between 3.18 and 4 out of 4. The cognitive interviews provided insight into response processes and comprehension difficulties. The corrected item-dimension correlations ranged between .02 and .83. Based on the results obtained in the three studies, some items were removed. Following these modifications, the internal consistency of the five dimensions ranged between .71 and .90.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study enabled the first version of the EFM to be refined, obtaining satisfactory internal consistency and item functioning indexes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39958,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia","volume":"60 5","pages":"Article 101674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elaboración y validación de la Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional (EFM): fases iniciales\",\"authors\":\"Joanes Lameirinhas, Arantxa Gorostiaga, Igone Etxeberria\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.regg.2025.101674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Although various instruments have been developed to assess frailty, they generally do not cover all its dimensions and have not demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to develop the Multidimensional Frailty Scale, originally called the <em>Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional</em> (EFM), to assess the physical, cognitive, affective, social, and environmental dimensions of frailty in individuals aged 65 and over and to conduct the initial phases of the validation process. This was carried out over the course of three sequential studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A series of items were developed for each dimension and then evaluated by a panel of 13 experts. Subsequently, cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 23 older adults to examine the response processes. Finally, a pilot study was performed with a sample of 50 individuals aged between 65 and 98 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The panel of experts awarded the items a mean appropriateness rating of between 3.18 and 4 out of 4. The cognitive interviews provided insight into response processes and comprehension difficulties. The corrected item-dimension correlations ranged between .02 and .83. Based on the results obtained in the three studies, some items were removed. Following these modifications, the internal consistency of the five dimensions ranged between .71 and .90.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study enabled the first version of the EFM to be refined, obtaining satisfactory internal consistency and item functioning indexes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211139X2500054X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211139X2500054X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然已经开发了各种各样的工具来评估脆弱,但它们通常不能涵盖所有的维度,也没有显示出令人满意的心理测量特性。本研究的目的是开发多维脆弱性量表,最初称为Escala de Fragilidad多维脆弱性量表(EFM),以评估65岁及以上老年人的身体、认知、情感、社会和环境方面的脆弱性,并进行验证过程的初始阶段。这是在三个连续的研究过程中进行的。方法为每个维度制定一系列项目,然后由13名专家组成的小组进行评估。随后,对23名老年人进行了认知访谈,以检查他们的反应过程。最后,对50名年龄在65岁到98岁之间的人进行了一项初步研究。结果专家小组对这些项目的平均适当性评分在3.18到4之间(满分4分)。认知访谈提供了对反应过程和理解困难的洞察。修正后的项目维度相关性在0.02到0.83之间。根据这三项研究的结果,我们删除了一些条目。经过这些修改,五个维度的内部一致性范围在0.71到0.90之间。结论本研究的结果使初版EFM得以完善,获得了满意的内部一致性和项目功能指标。
Elaboración y validación de la Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional (EFM): fases iniciales
Introduction
Although various instruments have been developed to assess frailty, they generally do not cover all its dimensions and have not demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to develop the Multidimensional Frailty Scale, originally called the Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional (EFM), to assess the physical, cognitive, affective, social, and environmental dimensions of frailty in individuals aged 65 and over and to conduct the initial phases of the validation process. This was carried out over the course of three sequential studies.
Methods
A series of items were developed for each dimension and then evaluated by a panel of 13 experts. Subsequently, cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 23 older adults to examine the response processes. Finally, a pilot study was performed with a sample of 50 individuals aged between 65 and 98 years.
Results
The panel of experts awarded the items a mean appropriateness rating of between 3.18 and 4 out of 4. The cognitive interviews provided insight into response processes and comprehension difficulties. The corrected item-dimension correlations ranged between .02 and .83. Based on the results obtained in the three studies, some items were removed. Following these modifications, the internal consistency of the five dimensions ranged between .71 and .90.
Conclusions
The results of this study enabled the first version of the EFM to be refined, obtaining satisfactory internal consistency and item functioning indexes.
期刊介绍:
Una revista de gran prestigio por sus artículos originales de investigación y revisiones. Permite cubrir todas las áreas de la medicina pero siempre desde la atención al paciente anciano, y está presente en los más reconocidos índices internacionales.