制定和验证多维脆弱性量表:初步阶段

Q3 Medicine
Joanes Lameirinhas, Arantxa Gorostiaga, Igone Etxeberria
{"title":"制定和验证多维脆弱性量表:初步阶段","authors":"Joanes Lameirinhas,&nbsp;Arantxa Gorostiaga,&nbsp;Igone Etxeberria","doi":"10.1016/j.regg.2025.101674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Although various instruments have been developed to assess frailty, they generally do not cover all its dimensions and have not demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to develop the Multidimensional Frailty Scale, originally called the <em>Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional</em> (EFM), to assess the physical, cognitive, affective, social, and environmental dimensions of frailty in individuals aged 65 and over and to conduct the initial phases of the validation process. This was carried out over the course of three sequential studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A series of items were developed for each dimension and then evaluated by a panel of 13 experts. Subsequently, cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 23 older adults to examine the response processes. Finally, a pilot study was performed with a sample of 50 individuals aged between 65 and 98 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The panel of experts awarded the items a mean appropriateness rating of between 3.18 and 4 out of 4. The cognitive interviews provided insight into response processes and comprehension difficulties. The corrected item-dimension correlations ranged between .02 and .83. Based on the results obtained in the three studies, some items were removed. Following these modifications, the internal consistency of the five dimensions ranged between .71 and .90.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study enabled the first version of the EFM to be refined, obtaining satisfactory internal consistency and item functioning indexes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39958,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia","volume":"60 5","pages":"Article 101674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elaboración y validación de la Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional (EFM): fases iniciales\",\"authors\":\"Joanes Lameirinhas,&nbsp;Arantxa Gorostiaga,&nbsp;Igone Etxeberria\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.regg.2025.101674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Although various instruments have been developed to assess frailty, they generally do not cover all its dimensions and have not demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to develop the Multidimensional Frailty Scale, originally called the <em>Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional</em> (EFM), to assess the physical, cognitive, affective, social, and environmental dimensions of frailty in individuals aged 65 and over and to conduct the initial phases of the validation process. This was carried out over the course of three sequential studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A series of items were developed for each dimension and then evaluated by a panel of 13 experts. Subsequently, cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 23 older adults to examine the response processes. Finally, a pilot study was performed with a sample of 50 individuals aged between 65 and 98 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The panel of experts awarded the items a mean appropriateness rating of between 3.18 and 4 out of 4. The cognitive interviews provided insight into response processes and comprehension difficulties. The corrected item-dimension correlations ranged between .02 and .83. Based on the results obtained in the three studies, some items were removed. Following these modifications, the internal consistency of the five dimensions ranged between .71 and .90.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study enabled the first version of the EFM to be refined, obtaining satisfactory internal consistency and item functioning indexes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211139X2500054X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211139X2500054X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然已经开发了各种各样的工具来评估脆弱,但它们通常不能涵盖所有的维度,也没有显示出令人满意的心理测量特性。本研究的目的是开发多维脆弱性量表,最初称为Escala de Fragilidad多维脆弱性量表(EFM),以评估65岁及以上老年人的身体、认知、情感、社会和环境方面的脆弱性,并进行验证过程的初始阶段。这是在三个连续的研究过程中进行的。方法为每个维度制定一系列项目,然后由13名专家组成的小组进行评估。随后,对23名老年人进行了认知访谈,以检查他们的反应过程。最后,对50名年龄在65岁到98岁之间的人进行了一项初步研究。结果专家小组对这些项目的平均适当性评分在3.18到4之间(满分4分)。认知访谈提供了对反应过程和理解困难的洞察。修正后的项目维度相关性在0.02到0.83之间。根据这三项研究的结果,我们删除了一些条目。经过这些修改,五个维度的内部一致性范围在0.71到0.90之间。结论本研究的结果使初版EFM得以完善,获得了满意的内部一致性和项目功能指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elaboración y validación de la Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional (EFM): fases iniciales

Introduction

Although various instruments have been developed to assess frailty, they generally do not cover all its dimensions and have not demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to develop the Multidimensional Frailty Scale, originally called the Escala de Fragilidad Multidimensional (EFM), to assess the physical, cognitive, affective, social, and environmental dimensions of frailty in individuals aged 65 and over and to conduct the initial phases of the validation process. This was carried out over the course of three sequential studies.

Methods

A series of items were developed for each dimension and then evaluated by a panel of 13 experts. Subsequently, cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 23 older adults to examine the response processes. Finally, a pilot study was performed with a sample of 50 individuals aged between 65 and 98 years.

Results

The panel of experts awarded the items a mean appropriateness rating of between 3.18 and 4 out of 4. The cognitive interviews provided insight into response processes and comprehension difficulties. The corrected item-dimension correlations ranged between .02 and .83. Based on the results obtained in the three studies, some items were removed. Following these modifications, the internal consistency of the five dimensions ranged between .71 and .90.

Conclusions

The results of this study enabled the first version of the EFM to be refined, obtaining satisfactory internal consistency and item functioning indexes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia
Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
85 days
期刊介绍: Una revista de gran prestigio por sus artículos originales de investigación y revisiones. Permite cubrir todas las áreas de la medicina pero siempre desde la atención al paciente anciano, y está presente en los más reconocidos índices internacionales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信