Yuliya Kersha , Yulia Melnik , Maria Novikova , Sergey Kosaretsky , Roman Zviagintsev
{"title":"评价后苏联空间30年的实验教育研究:学生成就研究的荟萃分析","authors":"Yuliya Kersha , Yulia Melnik , Maria Novikova , Sergey Kosaretsky , Roman Zviagintsev","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the importance of using an evidence-based approach in education has significantly increased. Research results from all over the world are utilized to shape educational practices and inform reforms. In post-Soviet countries, however, the need for evidence is at odds with a limited understanding of the availability and quality of data suitable for such purposes. The current meta-analysis addresses this gap by systematizing the results of experimental research aimed at improving student achievement in the post-Soviet space. To achieve this, we searched four databases and screened 1022 publications, identifying 41 studies relevant for analysis. The evaluation of the studies using a multi-level meta-analysis model (MLMA) showed that interventions analyzed had a positive and extremely high effect on student achievement (ES = 0.78), which contradicts similar work from other countries. At the same time at least two of the five methods employed in the study to evaluate publication bias proved its presence. Overall, the results of the systematic review indicate that the research available to date can hardly serve as a basis for evidence-based educational reform. The quality of the majority of experimental studies in the region highlights the need for future research into institutional factors that hinder the development of this type of studies. Recommendations were provided for authors and journals to improve the quality of experimental research and advance evidence-based approach in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating 30 years of experimental education research in the post-Soviet space: A meta-analysis of studies on student achievement\",\"authors\":\"Yuliya Kersha , Yulia Melnik , Maria Novikova , Sergey Kosaretsky , Roman Zviagintsev\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, the importance of using an evidence-based approach in education has significantly increased. Research results from all over the world are utilized to shape educational practices and inform reforms. In post-Soviet countries, however, the need for evidence is at odds with a limited understanding of the availability and quality of data suitable for such purposes. The current meta-analysis addresses this gap by systematizing the results of experimental research aimed at improving student achievement in the post-Soviet space. To achieve this, we searched four databases and screened 1022 publications, identifying 41 studies relevant for analysis. The evaluation of the studies using a multi-level meta-analysis model (MLMA) showed that interventions analyzed had a positive and extremely high effect on student achievement (ES = 0.78), which contradicts similar work from other countries. At the same time at least two of the five methods employed in the study to evaluate publication bias proved its presence. Overall, the results of the systematic review indicate that the research available to date can hardly serve as a basis for evidence-based educational reform. The quality of the majority of experimental studies in the region highlights the need for future research into institutional factors that hinder the development of this type of studies. Recommendations were provided for authors and journals to improve the quality of experimental research and advance evidence-based approach in the region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000720\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating 30 years of experimental education research in the post-Soviet space: A meta-analysis of studies on student achievement
In recent years, the importance of using an evidence-based approach in education has significantly increased. Research results from all over the world are utilized to shape educational practices and inform reforms. In post-Soviet countries, however, the need for evidence is at odds with a limited understanding of the availability and quality of data suitable for such purposes. The current meta-analysis addresses this gap by systematizing the results of experimental research aimed at improving student achievement in the post-Soviet space. To achieve this, we searched four databases and screened 1022 publications, identifying 41 studies relevant for analysis. The evaluation of the studies using a multi-level meta-analysis model (MLMA) showed that interventions analyzed had a positive and extremely high effect on student achievement (ES = 0.78), which contradicts similar work from other countries. At the same time at least two of the five methods employed in the study to evaluate publication bias proved its presence. Overall, the results of the systematic review indicate that the research available to date can hardly serve as a basis for evidence-based educational reform. The quality of the majority of experimental studies in the region highlights the need for future research into institutional factors that hinder the development of this type of studies. Recommendations were provided for authors and journals to improve the quality of experimental research and advance evidence-based approach in the region.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.