骨盆倾斜:腰骶半椎体切除短节段融合后弯曲进展的可能危险因素。

Haoran Zhang,Yiqiao Zhang,Zhuosong Bai,Yuechuan Zhang,Tongyin Zhang,Xiangjie Yin,Yunze Han,Shengru Wang,Qianyu Zhuang,Jianguo Zhang
{"title":"骨盆倾斜:腰骶半椎体切除短节段融合后弯曲进展的可能危险因素。","authors":"Haoran Zhang,Yiqiao Zhang,Zhuosong Bai,Yuechuan Zhang,Tongyin Zhang,Xiangjie Yin,Yunze Han,Shengru Wang,Qianyu Zhuang,Jianguo Zhang","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nA lumbosacral hemivertebra poses a unique problem, as it leads to a long compensatory curve above it and an obvious main curve. One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion is a standard surgery for patients with congenital scoliosis, but curve progression often occurs after surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the risk factors for curve progression in patients who underwent 1-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis study included 58 Han Chinese patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent 1-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion. Baseline information, radiographic parameters, and the Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire were collected preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. Risk factors for curve progression were evaluated using logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe mean age at surgery was 7.3 years, and the mean follow-up was 7.5 years. Nine patients (15.5%) were diagnosed with curve progression at the final follow-up. Compared with their preoperative condition, patients exhibited a significant reduction in the main curve (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2° to 28.9° preoperatively versus 6.8° to 9.4° at 3 months; p < 0.001), compensatory curve (95% CI, 15.0° to 19.8° versus 5.5° to 8.1°; p < 0.001), and coronal balance (95% CI, 12.4 to 16.9 mm versus 7.0 to 10.5 mm; p < 0.001) at 3 months postoperatively. The progression group had larger preoperative pelvic obliquity values than the non-progression group (95% CI, 3.19° to 6.55° versus 2.01° to 2.63°; p = 0.008). The logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative pelvic obliquity was a significant independent risk factor for curve progression (odds ratio, 1.653; 95% CI, 1.096 to 2.495; p = 0.017). The ROC analysis revealed that preoperative pelvic obliquity had good discriminatory capability (area under the ROC curve, 0.876; 95% CI, 0.677 to 1.000; p < 0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn summary, preoperative pelvic obliquity was an independent risk factor for curve progression, which means that preoperative measures should be taken to ensure minimal pelvic obliquity in patients in order to effectively prevent curve progression. The presence of pelvic obliquity should alert the surgeon and patients to the high risk of deformity progression and to the need for scheduling more frequent follow-ups as appropriate.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pelvic Obliquity: A Possible Risk Factor for Curve Progression After Lumbosacral Hemivertebra Resection with Short Segmental Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Haoran Zhang,Yiqiao Zhang,Zhuosong Bai,Yuechuan Zhang,Tongyin Zhang,Xiangjie Yin,Yunze Han,Shengru Wang,Qianyu Zhuang,Jianguo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/jbjs.24.00331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nA lumbosacral hemivertebra poses a unique problem, as it leads to a long compensatory curve above it and an obvious main curve. One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion is a standard surgery for patients with congenital scoliosis, but curve progression often occurs after surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the risk factors for curve progression in patients who underwent 1-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis study included 58 Han Chinese patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent 1-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion. Baseline information, radiographic parameters, and the Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire were collected preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. Risk factors for curve progression were evaluated using logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe mean age at surgery was 7.3 years, and the mean follow-up was 7.5 years. Nine patients (15.5%) were diagnosed with curve progression at the final follow-up. Compared with their preoperative condition, patients exhibited a significant reduction in the main curve (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2° to 28.9° preoperatively versus 6.8° to 9.4° at 3 months; p < 0.001), compensatory curve (95% CI, 15.0° to 19.8° versus 5.5° to 8.1°; p < 0.001), and coronal balance (95% CI, 12.4 to 16.9 mm versus 7.0 to 10.5 mm; p < 0.001) at 3 months postoperatively. The progression group had larger preoperative pelvic obliquity values than the non-progression group (95% CI, 3.19° to 6.55° versus 2.01° to 2.63°; p = 0.008). The logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative pelvic obliquity was a significant independent risk factor for curve progression (odds ratio, 1.653; 95% CI, 1.096 to 2.495; p = 0.017). The ROC analysis revealed that preoperative pelvic obliquity had good discriminatory capability (area under the ROC curve, 0.876; 95% CI, 0.677 to 1.000; p < 0.001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nIn summary, preoperative pelvic obliquity was an independent risk factor for curve progression, which means that preoperative measures should be taken to ensure minimal pelvic obliquity in patients in order to effectively prevent curve progression. The presence of pelvic obliquity should alert the surgeon and patients to the high risk of deformity progression and to the need for scheduling more frequent follow-ups as appropriate.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nPrognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腰骶半椎体是一个独特的问题,因为它导致其上面有一个很长的代偿曲线和一个明显的主曲线。一期后路半椎体切除术加短节段融合术是先天性脊柱侧凸患者的标准手术,但术后常发生弯曲进展。本研究的目的是探讨行一期后半椎体切除术合并短节段融合的患者发生弯曲进展的危险因素。方法58例汉族先天性脊柱侧凸患者行一期后路半椎体切除短节段融合术。术前、术后3个月和最后一次随访时收集基线信息、影像学参数和脊柱侧凸研究协会-22r问卷。采用logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价曲线进展的危险因素。结果患者平均手术年龄7.3岁,平均随访时间7.5年。9例患者(15.5%)在最后随访时被诊断为弯曲进展。与术前相比,患者的主曲线显著降低(95%可信区间[CI],术前25.2°至28.9°,3个月时为6.8°至9.4°;p < 0.001),代偿曲线(95% CI, 15.0°至19.8°对5.5°至8.1°;p < 0.001)和冠状平衡(95% CI, 12.4 ~ 16.9 mm vs 7.0 ~ 10.5 mm;P < 0.001)。进展组术前盆腔倾角值大于非进展组(95% CI, 3.19°~ 6.55°比2.01°~ 2.63°;P = 0.008)。logistic回归分析显示,术前骨盆倾斜是曲线进展的重要独立危险因素(优势比为1.653;95% CI, 1.096 ~ 2.495;P = 0.017)。ROC分析显示,术前骨盆倾角具有较好的判别能力(ROC曲线下面积0.876;95% CI, 0.677 ~ 1.000;P < 0.001)。结论综上所述,术前盆腔内倾角是曲度进展的独立危险因素,术前应采取措施确保患者盆腔内倾角最小,以有效预防曲度进展。骨盆倾斜的存在应该提醒外科医生和患者注意畸形进展的高风险,并需要适当安排更频繁的随访。证据等级:预后IV级。参见《作者说明》获得证据等级的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pelvic Obliquity: A Possible Risk Factor for Curve Progression After Lumbosacral Hemivertebra Resection with Short Segmental Fusion.
BACKGROUND A lumbosacral hemivertebra poses a unique problem, as it leads to a long compensatory curve above it and an obvious main curve. One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion is a standard surgery for patients with congenital scoliosis, but curve progression often occurs after surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the risk factors for curve progression in patients who underwent 1-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion. METHODS This study included 58 Han Chinese patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent 1-stage posterior hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion. Baseline information, radiographic parameters, and the Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire were collected preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. Risk factors for curve progression were evaluated using logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS The mean age at surgery was 7.3 years, and the mean follow-up was 7.5 years. Nine patients (15.5%) were diagnosed with curve progression at the final follow-up. Compared with their preoperative condition, patients exhibited a significant reduction in the main curve (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2° to 28.9° preoperatively versus 6.8° to 9.4° at 3 months; p < 0.001), compensatory curve (95% CI, 15.0° to 19.8° versus 5.5° to 8.1°; p < 0.001), and coronal balance (95% CI, 12.4 to 16.9 mm versus 7.0 to 10.5 mm; p < 0.001) at 3 months postoperatively. The progression group had larger preoperative pelvic obliquity values than the non-progression group (95% CI, 3.19° to 6.55° versus 2.01° to 2.63°; p = 0.008). The logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative pelvic obliquity was a significant independent risk factor for curve progression (odds ratio, 1.653; 95% CI, 1.096 to 2.495; p = 0.017). The ROC analysis revealed that preoperative pelvic obliquity had good discriminatory capability (area under the ROC curve, 0.876; 95% CI, 0.677 to 1.000; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In summary, preoperative pelvic obliquity was an independent risk factor for curve progression, which means that preoperative measures should be taken to ensure minimal pelvic obliquity in patients in order to effectively prevent curve progression. The presence of pelvic obliquity should alert the surgeon and patients to the high risk of deformity progression and to the need for scheduling more frequent follow-ups as appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信