Florian Borchert, Paul Wullenweber, Annika Oeser, Nina Kreuzberger, Torsten Karge, Thomas Langer, Nicole Skoetz, Lothar H. Wieler, Matthieu-P. Schapranow, Bert Arnrich
{"title":"高精度信息检索快速临床指南更新","authors":"Florian Borchert, Paul Wullenweber, Annika Oeser, Nina Kreuzberger, Torsten Karge, Thomas Langer, Nicole Skoetz, Lothar H. Wieler, Matthieu-P. Schapranow, Bert Arnrich","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01648-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Delays in translating new medical evidence into clinical practice hinder patient access to the best available treatments. Our data reveals an average delay of nine years from the initiation of human research to its adoption in clinical guidelines, with 1.7–3.0 years lost between trial publication and guideline updates. A substantial part of these delays stems from slow, manual processes in updating clinical guidelines, which rely on time-intensive evidence synthesis workflows. The Next Generation Evidence (NGE) system addresses this challenge by harnessing state-of-the-art biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods. This novel system integrates diverse evidence sources, such as clinical trial reports and digital guidelines, enabling automated, data-driven analyses of the time it takes for research findings to inform clinical practice. Moreover, the NGE system provides precision-focused literature search filters tailored specifically for guideline maintenance. In benchmarking against two German oncology guidelines, these filters demonstrate exceptional precision in identifying pivotal publications for guideline updates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-precision information retrieval for rapid clinical guideline updates\",\"authors\":\"Florian Borchert, Paul Wullenweber, Annika Oeser, Nina Kreuzberger, Torsten Karge, Thomas Langer, Nicole Skoetz, Lothar H. Wieler, Matthieu-P. Schapranow, Bert Arnrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01648-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Delays in translating new medical evidence into clinical practice hinder patient access to the best available treatments. Our data reveals an average delay of nine years from the initiation of human research to its adoption in clinical guidelines, with 1.7–3.0 years lost between trial publication and guideline updates. A substantial part of these delays stems from slow, manual processes in updating clinical guidelines, which rely on time-intensive evidence synthesis workflows. The Next Generation Evidence (NGE) system addresses this challenge by harnessing state-of-the-art biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods. This novel system integrates diverse evidence sources, such as clinical trial reports and digital guidelines, enabling automated, data-driven analyses of the time it takes for research findings to inform clinical practice. Moreover, the NGE system provides precision-focused literature search filters tailored specifically for guideline maintenance. In benchmarking against two German oncology guidelines, these filters demonstrate exceptional precision in identifying pivotal publications for guideline updates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01648-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01648-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
High-precision information retrieval for rapid clinical guideline updates
Delays in translating new medical evidence into clinical practice hinder patient access to the best available treatments. Our data reveals an average delay of nine years from the initiation of human research to its adoption in clinical guidelines, with 1.7–3.0 years lost between trial publication and guideline updates. A substantial part of these delays stems from slow, manual processes in updating clinical guidelines, which rely on time-intensive evidence synthesis workflows. The Next Generation Evidence (NGE) system addresses this challenge by harnessing state-of-the-art biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods. This novel system integrates diverse evidence sources, such as clinical trial reports and digital guidelines, enabling automated, data-driven analyses of the time it takes for research findings to inform clinical practice. Moreover, the NGE system provides precision-focused literature search filters tailored specifically for guideline maintenance. In benchmarking against two German oncology guidelines, these filters demonstrate exceptional precision in identifying pivotal publications for guideline updates.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.