基于药物计量学模型的替利利单抗替代给药方案

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ahsan Rizwan, Hugh Giovinazzo, Tian Yu, Yuying Gao, Kun Wang, Fengyan Xu, Ya Wan, Jun Wang, Srikumar Sahasranaman, Marcia Campbell, Patrick Schnell, Ramil Abdrashitov, William D. Hanley, Nageshwar Budha
{"title":"基于药物计量学模型的替利利单抗替代给药方案","authors":"Ahsan Rizwan,&nbsp;Hugh Giovinazzo,&nbsp;Tian Yu,&nbsp;Yuying Gao,&nbsp;Kun Wang,&nbsp;Fengyan Xu,&nbsp;Ya Wan,&nbsp;Jun Wang,&nbsp;Srikumar Sahasranaman,&nbsp;Marcia Campbell,&nbsp;Patrick Schnell,&nbsp;Ramil Abdrashitov,&nbsp;William D. Hanley,&nbsp;Nageshwar Budha","doi":"10.1111/cts.70223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) is approved for the treatment of multiple cancers. We used a model-based approach to propose three alternative dosing regimens, 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W, with the aims of providing flexible treatment regimens compatible with background chemotherapy and/or reducing infusion visits. A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate pharmacokinetic exposure of the alternative regimens. Regulatory guidance on alternative dosing was used to define pharmacokinetics-based criteria. Alternative doses were selected by simulation, exposure matching, and comparison to the reference regimen of 200 mg Q3W. Deviations from pharmacokinetics-based criteria were bridged using appropriate safety and efficacy references and exposure–response analyses. All three alternative dosing regimens produced comparable exposures versus 200 mg Q3W. Although simulated peak serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) at 300 mg Q4W and 400 mg Q6W was higher versus 200 mg Q3W, this was below the C<sub>max</sub> of the 5 mg/kg Q3W safety reference. And while the trough serum concentration (C<sub>trough</sub>) for 400 mg Q6W was slightly lower versus 200 mg Q3W, it was 10.7% higher than the 2 mg/kg efficacy reference C<sub>trough</sub>, and therefore, within the concentration range in which a flat exposure–efficacy relationship of tislelizumab has been established. Tislelizumab regimens of 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W are expected to result in similar safety and efficacy as 200 mg Q3W.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70223","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Dosing Regimens of Tislelizumab Using a Pharmacometrics Model-Based Approach\",\"authors\":\"Ahsan Rizwan,&nbsp;Hugh Giovinazzo,&nbsp;Tian Yu,&nbsp;Yuying Gao,&nbsp;Kun Wang,&nbsp;Fengyan Xu,&nbsp;Ya Wan,&nbsp;Jun Wang,&nbsp;Srikumar Sahasranaman,&nbsp;Marcia Campbell,&nbsp;Patrick Schnell,&nbsp;Ramil Abdrashitov,&nbsp;William D. Hanley,&nbsp;Nageshwar Budha\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) is approved for the treatment of multiple cancers. We used a model-based approach to propose three alternative dosing regimens, 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W, with the aims of providing flexible treatment regimens compatible with background chemotherapy and/or reducing infusion visits. A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate pharmacokinetic exposure of the alternative regimens. Regulatory guidance on alternative dosing was used to define pharmacokinetics-based criteria. Alternative doses were selected by simulation, exposure matching, and comparison to the reference regimen of 200 mg Q3W. Deviations from pharmacokinetics-based criteria were bridged using appropriate safety and efficacy references and exposure–response analyses. All three alternative dosing regimens produced comparable exposures versus 200 mg Q3W. Although simulated peak serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) at 300 mg Q4W and 400 mg Q6W was higher versus 200 mg Q3W, this was below the C<sub>max</sub> of the 5 mg/kg Q3W safety reference. And while the trough serum concentration (C<sub>trough</sub>) for 400 mg Q6W was slightly lower versus 200 mg Q3W, it was 10.7% higher than the 2 mg/kg efficacy reference C<sub>trough</sub>, and therefore, within the concentration range in which a flat exposure–efficacy relationship of tislelizumab has been established. Tislelizumab regimens of 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W are expected to result in similar safety and efficacy as 200 mg Q3W.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70223\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Tislelizumab 200mg,每3周1次(Q3W)被批准用于治疗多种癌症。我们使用基于模型的方法提出了三种替代给药方案,150mg Q2W, 300mg Q4W和400mg Q6W,目的是提供与背景化疗兼容的灵活治疗方案和/或减少输注次数。先前开发的人群药代动力学模型用于模拟替代方案的药代动力学暴露。替代给药的监管指南用于定义基于药代动力学的标准。通过模拟、暴露匹配和与参考方案200mg Q3W的比较来选择替代剂量。使用适当的安全性和有效性参考文献以及暴露-反应分析来弥合基于药代动力学标准的偏差。与200 mg Q3W相比,所有三种替代给药方案产生的暴露量相当。虽然300 mg Q4W和400 mg Q6W的模拟血清峰值浓度(Cmax)高于200 mg Q3W,但低于5 mg/kg Q3W的安全参考值的Cmax。与200 mg Q3W相比,400 mg Q6W的谷血清浓度(Ctrough)略低,但比2 mg/kg的功效参考浓度(Ctrough)高10.7%,因此,在该浓度范围内,tislelizumab的暴露-功效关系已经建立。150 mg Q2W、300 mg Q4W和400 mg Q6W的Tislelizumab方案预计将产生与200 mg Q3W相似的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Alternative Dosing Regimens of Tislelizumab Using a Pharmacometrics Model-Based Approach

Alternative Dosing Regimens of Tislelizumab Using a Pharmacometrics Model-Based Approach

Tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) is approved for the treatment of multiple cancers. We used a model-based approach to propose three alternative dosing regimens, 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W, with the aims of providing flexible treatment regimens compatible with background chemotherapy and/or reducing infusion visits. A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate pharmacokinetic exposure of the alternative regimens. Regulatory guidance on alternative dosing was used to define pharmacokinetics-based criteria. Alternative doses were selected by simulation, exposure matching, and comparison to the reference regimen of 200 mg Q3W. Deviations from pharmacokinetics-based criteria were bridged using appropriate safety and efficacy references and exposure–response analyses. All three alternative dosing regimens produced comparable exposures versus 200 mg Q3W. Although simulated peak serum concentration (Cmax) at 300 mg Q4W and 400 mg Q6W was higher versus 200 mg Q3W, this was below the Cmax of the 5 mg/kg Q3W safety reference. And while the trough serum concentration (Ctrough) for 400 mg Q6W was slightly lower versus 200 mg Q3W, it was 10.7% higher than the 2 mg/kg efficacy reference Ctrough, and therefore, within the concentration range in which a flat exposure–efficacy relationship of tislelizumab has been established. Tislelizumab regimens of 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W are expected to result in similar safety and efficacy as 200 mg Q3W.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信