Tatiane Morelati Rosa de Camargo, Paulo José Barbosa Gutierres Filho, Anderson Freitas
{"title":"大转子疼痛综合征患者肌肉力量与临床状况的相关性:一项横断面研究","authors":"Tatiane Morelati Rosa de Camargo, Paulo José Barbosa Gutierres Filho, Anderson Freitas","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To elucidate hip muscle strength in regular exercisers diagnosed with Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) by comparing it with that in non-exercisers, and investigate whether there is a correlation between hip muscle strength deficits and the clinical condition of individuals with GTPS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional, prospective, blinded study assessed muscle strength through maximal isometric contraction and investigated whether it was correlated with clinical outcomes measured using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G) questionnaire and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the 46 participants included, a positive, significant, and moderate relationship was noted between hip abductor strength and VISA-G scores (r = 0.542, p < 0.001). Additionally, a significant, weak, negative correlation was found between hip abductor strength and VAS scores (r = - 0.335, p = 0.001). Compared with non-exercisers, exercisers had a significantly lower body mass index (25.18 ± 2.9), experienced less pain (df = 44, t = −3.97, p < 0.001), showed improved functional capacity (U = 109.00, p < 0.001), and had greater hip abductor strength (df = 44, t = 2.78, p = 0.008).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated a significant positive correlation between hip abductor strength and VISA-G scores, as well as a significant, but weak, negative correlation between hip abductor strength and VAS scores in participants with GTPS. Furthermore, compared with non-exercisers, exercisers had superior muscle strength, improved functional capacity, and reported less pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"43 ","pages":"Pages 159-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between muscle strength and clinical condition in individuals with greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Tatiane Morelati Rosa de Camargo, Paulo José Barbosa Gutierres Filho, Anderson Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To elucidate hip muscle strength in regular exercisers diagnosed with Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) by comparing it with that in non-exercisers, and investigate whether there is a correlation between hip muscle strength deficits and the clinical condition of individuals with GTPS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional, prospective, blinded study assessed muscle strength through maximal isometric contraction and investigated whether it was correlated with clinical outcomes measured using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G) questionnaire and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the 46 participants included, a positive, significant, and moderate relationship was noted between hip abductor strength and VISA-G scores (r = 0.542, p < 0.001). Additionally, a significant, weak, negative correlation was found between hip abductor strength and VAS scores (r = - 0.335, p = 0.001). Compared with non-exercisers, exercisers had a significantly lower body mass index (25.18 ± 2.9), experienced less pain (df = 44, t = −3.97, p < 0.001), showed improved functional capacity (U = 109.00, p < 0.001), and had greater hip abductor strength (df = 44, t = 2.78, p = 0.008).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated a significant positive correlation between hip abductor strength and VISA-G scores, as well as a significant, but weak, negative correlation between hip abductor strength and VAS scores in participants with GTPS. Furthermore, compared with non-exercisers, exercisers had superior muscle strength, improved functional capacity, and reported less pain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225001202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225001202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的通过与非锻炼者的比较,了解经常锻炼者诊断为大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)的髋部肌力,探讨髋部肌力缺陷与GTPS患者的临床状况是否存在相关性。方法:这项横断面、前瞻性、盲法研究通过最大等距收缩评估肌肉力量,并研究其是否与使用维多利亚运动评估研究所臀腱病(VISA-G)问卷和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的临床结果相关。结果在纳入的46名受试者中,髋关节外展肌力与VISA-G评分呈显著正相关(r = 0.542, p <;0.001)。此外,髋外展肌力量与VAS评分之间存在显著的弱负相关(r = - 0.335, p = 0.001)。与非锻炼者相比,锻炼者的身体质量指数(25.18±2.9)明显降低,疼痛感明显减轻(df = 44, t = - 3.97, p <;0.001),显示功能能力改善(U = 109.00, p <;0.001),髋外展肌力量更大(df = 44, t = 2.78, p = 0.008)。结论GTPS患者髋关节外展肌力与VISA-G评分呈显著正相关,髋关节外展肌力与VAS评分呈显著负相关。此外,与非锻炼者相比,锻炼者的肌肉力量更强,功能能力更强,疼痛也更少。
Correlation between muscle strength and clinical condition in individuals with greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a cross-sectional study
Objective
To elucidate hip muscle strength in regular exercisers diagnosed with Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) by comparing it with that in non-exercisers, and investigate whether there is a correlation between hip muscle strength deficits and the clinical condition of individuals with GTPS.
Methods
This cross-sectional, prospective, blinded study assessed muscle strength through maximal isometric contraction and investigated whether it was correlated with clinical outcomes measured using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G) questionnaire and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain.
Results
In the 46 participants included, a positive, significant, and moderate relationship was noted between hip abductor strength and VISA-G scores (r = 0.542, p < 0.001). Additionally, a significant, weak, negative correlation was found between hip abductor strength and VAS scores (r = - 0.335, p = 0.001). Compared with non-exercisers, exercisers had a significantly lower body mass index (25.18 ± 2.9), experienced less pain (df = 44, t = −3.97, p < 0.001), showed improved functional capacity (U = 109.00, p < 0.001), and had greater hip abductor strength (df = 44, t = 2.78, p = 0.008).
Conclusion
This study demonstrated a significant positive correlation between hip abductor strength and VISA-G scores, as well as a significant, but weak, negative correlation between hip abductor strength and VAS scores in participants with GTPS. Furthermore, compared with non-exercisers, exercisers had superior muscle strength, improved functional capacity, and reported less pain.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina