对比剂对治疗计划放疗剂量分布影响的系统综述

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mohammad Haghparast , Forough Jamil , Leili Darvish
{"title":"对比剂对治疗计划放疗剂量分布影响的系统综述","authors":"Mohammad Haghparast ,&nbsp;Forough Jamil ,&nbsp;Leili Darvish","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>One method of increasing the quality of CT images is the use of contrast agents. The evidence underscores the clinical importance of using contrast-enhanced imaging in the treatment planning process and highlights the potential to improve patient care and treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quantitative changes caused by contrast agents used in CT simulator images for photon dosimetry in radiotherapy treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The selected databases were Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search string was applied in the title, abstract, and keywords fields across the three international databases. The search terms included: contrast agent, dose distribution, dose difference, treatment planning system, treatment planning, radiotherapy, and Iodine contrast. The articles search was conducted between July and August 2024. The identified articles were evaluated for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 399 records, after removing duplicate records (n=153), studies were screened by title and abstract to assess eligibility. After removing unrelated studies, 25 articles were included. A systematic review study showed that the difference in dose between the use of contrast agents and without contrast agents was 2% or less than 2%. Only three studies with 36 patients showed the dose differences were more than 2%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic review concluded that the use of contrast agents in radiotherapy at different sites and with different techniques does not significantly affect the extent of dose distribution changes, and this small difference is clinically acceptable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 5","pages":"Article 101910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of contrast agent on dose distribution in treatment planning radiotherapy: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Haghparast ,&nbsp;Forough Jamil ,&nbsp;Leili Darvish\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>One method of increasing the quality of CT images is the use of contrast agents. The evidence underscores the clinical importance of using contrast-enhanced imaging in the treatment planning process and highlights the potential to improve patient care and treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quantitative changes caused by contrast agents used in CT simulator images for photon dosimetry in radiotherapy treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The selected databases were Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search string was applied in the title, abstract, and keywords fields across the three international databases. The search terms included: contrast agent, dose distribution, dose difference, treatment planning system, treatment planning, radiotherapy, and Iodine contrast. The articles search was conducted between July and August 2024. The identified articles were evaluated for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 399 records, after removing duplicate records (n=153), studies were screened by title and abstract to assess eligibility. After removing unrelated studies, 25 articles were included. A systematic review study showed that the difference in dose between the use of contrast agents and without contrast agents was 2% or less than 2%. Only three studies with 36 patients showed the dose differences were more than 2%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic review concluded that the use of contrast agents in radiotherapy at different sites and with different techniques does not significantly affect the extent of dose distribution changes, and this small difference is clinically acceptable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865425000608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865425000608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景提高CT图像质量的一种方法是使用造影剂。证据强调了在治疗计划过程中使用对比增强成像的临床重要性,并强调了改善患者护理和治疗效果的潜力。本研究的目的是评估在放射治疗计划中用于光子剂量学的CT模拟图像中使用的造影剂引起的定量变化。方法选择Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、Embase、谷歌Scholar等数据库。搜索字符串应用于三个国际数据库的标题、摘要和关键字字段。检索词包括:造影剂、剂量分布、剂量差、治疗计划系统、治疗计划、放射治疗、碘造影剂。文章检索是在2024年7月至8月进行的。使用乔安娜·布里格斯检查表对确定的文章进行方法学质量评估。结果共纳入399篇文献,剔除重复文献(n=153)后,通过题目和摘要进行筛选。在剔除不相关研究后,纳入了25篇文章。一项系统评价研究显示,使用对比剂和未使用对比剂的剂量差异为2%或小于2%。只有三项涉及36名患者的研究显示,剂量差异超过2%。结论本系统综述认为,不同部位、不同技术使用对比剂对放疗剂量分布变化的影响程度不明显,这种微小的差异在临床上是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of contrast agent on dose distribution in treatment planning radiotherapy: A systematic review

Background

One method of increasing the quality of CT images is the use of contrast agents. The evidence underscores the clinical importance of using contrast-enhanced imaging in the treatment planning process and highlights the potential to improve patient care and treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quantitative changes caused by contrast agents used in CT simulator images for photon dosimetry in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Method

The selected databases were Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search string was applied in the title, abstract, and keywords fields across the three international databases. The search terms included: contrast agent, dose distribution, dose difference, treatment planning system, treatment planning, radiotherapy, and Iodine contrast. The articles search was conducted between July and August 2024. The identified articles were evaluated for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Checklist.

Results

A total of 399 records, after removing duplicate records (n=153), studies were screened by title and abstract to assess eligibility. After removing unrelated studies, 25 articles were included. A systematic review study showed that the difference in dose between the use of contrast agents and without contrast agents was 2% or less than 2%. Only three studies with 36 patients showed the dose differences were more than 2%.

Conclusion

This systematic review concluded that the use of contrast agents in radiotherapy at different sites and with different techniques does not significantly affect the extent of dose distribution changes, and this small difference is clinically acceptable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信