Siviwe Shwababa , Matthew F. Child , Alta de Vos , Naledi Mneno , Hayley S. Clements
{"title":"为土地改革受益者有意义地参与野生动物经济创造机会","authors":"Siviwe Shwababa , Matthew F. Child , Alta de Vos , Naledi Mneno , Hayley S. Clements","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 107565"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy\",\"authors\":\"Siviwe Shwababa , Matthew F. Child , Alta de Vos , Naledi Mneno , Hayley S. Clements\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000997\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000997","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy
Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.
期刊介绍:
Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use.
Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.