为土地改革受益者有意义地参与野生动物经济创造机会

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Siviwe Shwababa , Matthew F. Child , Alta de Vos , Naledi Mneno , Hayley S. Clements
{"title":"为土地改革受益者有意义地参与野生动物经济创造机会","authors":"Siviwe Shwababa ,&nbsp;Matthew F. Child ,&nbsp;Alta de Vos ,&nbsp;Naledi Mneno ,&nbsp;Hayley S. Clements","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 107565"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy\",\"authors\":\"Siviwe Shwababa ,&nbsp;Matthew F. Child ,&nbsp;Alta de Vos ,&nbsp;Naledi Mneno ,&nbsp;Hayley S. Clements\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000997\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000997","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地改革是世界范围内一项重要的社会正义运动,通常侧重于农业用地。然而,在世界上许多地方,土地改革特性存在于具有高生物多样性价值的地区,在这些地区存在将土地改革与基于野生动物的土地利用相结合的选择,以促进保护和社会经济发展。为了有效地设计和实施旨在开启这条尚未探索的包容性野生动物经济之路的政策,我们需要了解在重新分配的土地上建立和运营可行的野生动物企业所面临的机遇和障碍。我们对南非东开普省通过改革获得土地的19名土地所有者进行了调查。我们旨在了解野生动物经济的发展状况,并评估这些市场进入者的投资需求。它们的特征与74个已建立的野生牧场和21个传统畜牧业农场的数据进行了对比。尽管所有土地改革企业都在其商业计划中列出了以野生动物为基础的经济活动,并且大多数(84% %)拥有野生动物,但只有42% %的企业从野生动物中获得(非常有限的)收入。提高野生动物收入的常见障碍是缺乏基础设施(特别是围栏、水和住宿)和野生动物库存。由于缺乏对可行的野生动物商业模式的决策支持,以及随后缺乏获得技能发展和市场信息的渠道,进一步阻碍了对野生动物经济的参与。我们的研究结果显示,政府和房地产商业计划支持的活动与那些适合环境且可行的活动之间存在不匹配。我们建议南非的土地改革计划需要发展有针对性的基础设施和技能发展,考虑到最适合特定地点的商业模式。本文概述的障碍和机会可以为利用国家和私人投资更有效地创造可行的野生动物商业模式的战略提供信息,并在南非实现社会正义和生物多样性保护的双重目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy
Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信