低收入和中等收入国家艾滋病毒检测和联系服务的社会网络干预措施的主要设计特征和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Madalo Mukoka, Takondwa C. Msosa, Hussein H. Twabi, Robina Semphere, Marriott Nliwasa, Guy Harling, Alison Price, Katherine Fielding, Augustine T. Choko
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家艾滋病毒检测和联系服务的社会网络干预措施的主要设计特征和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Madalo Mukoka,&nbsp;Takondwa C. Msosa,&nbsp;Hussein H. Twabi,&nbsp;Robina Semphere,&nbsp;Marriott Nliwasa,&nbsp;Guy Harling,&nbsp;Alison Price,&nbsp;Katherine Fielding,&nbsp;Augustine T. Choko","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>HIV remains a global health challenge with a reported 39 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 2022. Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Pacific are home to 82% of PLHIV, where limited access to healthcare resources underscores the urgency of innovative strategies to combat the epidemic effectively. Social network interventions (SNIs) hold promise for improving HIV testing and linkage services by engaging populations at greatest risk. This review evaluates the key design features and effectiveness of SNIs for HIV testing and linkage in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched four databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science) for the period from 1st January 2003 until 16th June 2023. A combination of the terms “Social Network,” “HIV,” “testing” and “linkage” with an LMIC filter was used. We included interventional study designs that compared an SNI for HIV testing and/or linkage to care against non-network comparator approaches. Narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize the results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 6763 records, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria; eight were randomized controlled trials, and five were non-randomized designs. Nine studies engaged key populations. The most common strategy involved recruiting and training seeds, who then delivered HIV services to network members. The use of networks varied significantly across the papers. The network approaches used were induction (<i>n</i> = 11), alteration (<i>n</i> = 1) and a combination of individual and segmentation approaches (<i>n</i> = 1). The pooled estimates showed that SNIs had a modest effect on the uptake of HIV testing RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.08−1.17) but the directionality of effect for the proportion newly diagnosed positive (RR 0.88 [95% CI 0.74−1.04]) and linkage to care (RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.86−1.08]) was towards the null.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>SNIs improved the uptake of HIV testing and exhibit important variability in their design.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is a need for more studies designed to capture the complex relational dynamics of network interventions and to provide strong evidence on their isolated effects. Additionally, it is necessary to expand the use of network approaches to other priority populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PROSPERO Number</h3>\n \n <p>CRD42023434770</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26458","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The key design features and effectiveness of social network interventions for HIV testing and linkage services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Madalo Mukoka,&nbsp;Takondwa C. Msosa,&nbsp;Hussein H. Twabi,&nbsp;Robina Semphere,&nbsp;Marriott Nliwasa,&nbsp;Guy Harling,&nbsp;Alison Price,&nbsp;Katherine Fielding,&nbsp;Augustine T. Choko\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jia2.26458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>HIV remains a global health challenge with a reported 39 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 2022. Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Pacific are home to 82% of PLHIV, where limited access to healthcare resources underscores the urgency of innovative strategies to combat the epidemic effectively. Social network interventions (SNIs) hold promise for improving HIV testing and linkage services by engaging populations at greatest risk. This review evaluates the key design features and effectiveness of SNIs for HIV testing and linkage in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched four databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science) for the period from 1st January 2003 until 16th June 2023. A combination of the terms “Social Network,” “HIV,” “testing” and “linkage” with an LMIC filter was used. We included interventional study designs that compared an SNI for HIV testing and/or linkage to care against non-network comparator approaches. Narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize the results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 6763 records, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria; eight were randomized controlled trials, and five were non-randomized designs. Nine studies engaged key populations. The most common strategy involved recruiting and training seeds, who then delivered HIV services to network members. The use of networks varied significantly across the papers. The network approaches used were induction (<i>n</i> = 11), alteration (<i>n</i> = 1) and a combination of individual and segmentation approaches (<i>n</i> = 1). The pooled estimates showed that SNIs had a modest effect on the uptake of HIV testing RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.08−1.17) but the directionality of effect for the proportion newly diagnosed positive (RR 0.88 [95% CI 0.74−1.04]) and linkage to care (RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.86−1.08]) was towards the null.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>SNIs improved the uptake of HIV testing and exhibit important variability in their design.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is a need for more studies designed to capture the complex relational dynamics of network interventions and to provide strong evidence on their isolated effects. Additionally, it is necessary to expand the use of network approaches to other priority populations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PROSPERO Number</h3>\\n \\n <p>CRD42023434770</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26458\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26458\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

艾滋病毒仍然是一项全球卫生挑战,据报道,2022年有3900万人感染艾滋病毒(PLHIV)。撒哈拉以南非洲、亚洲和太平洋地区占艾滋病毒感染者总数的82%,这些地区获得医疗资源的机会有限,因此迫切需要采取创新战略,有效防治这一流行病。社会网络干预措施(SNIs)有望通过使高危人群参与进来,改善艾滋病毒检测和联系服务。本综述评估了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的HIV检测和联动SNIs的主要设计特征和有效性。方法检索自2003年1月1日至2023年6月16日的Medline、Embase、Global Health、Web of Science四个数据库。使用了“社交网络”、“艾滋病毒”、“检测”和“链接”等术语的组合,并使用了LMIC过滤器。我们纳入了干预性研究设计,将SNI用于HIV检测和/或与非网络比较方法的护理联系进行了比较。采用叙事综合和随机效应荟萃分析对结果进行综合。结果在6763条记录中,13项研究符合纳入标准;8项为随机对照试验,5项为非随机设计。9项研究涉及关键人群。最常见的策略是招募和培训种子,然后他们向网络成员提供艾滋病毒服务。不同论文对网络的使用差异很大。使用的网络方法是归纳法(n = 11),合并估计显示,SNIs对HIV检测的吸收有适度影响(RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.08 - 1.17]),但对新诊断为阳性的比例(RR 0.88 [95% CI 0.74 - 1.04])和与护理的联系(RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.86 - 1.08])的影响方向性趋近于零。SNIs提高了HIV检测的接受度,并在其设计中表现出重要的可变性。有必要进行更多的研究,以捕捉网络干预的复杂关系动态,并为其孤立效应提供强有力的证据。此外,有必要扩大对其他优先人口使用网络办法。普洛斯彼罗号码CRD42023434770
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The key design features and effectiveness of social network interventions for HIV testing and linkage services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The key design features and effectiveness of social network interventions for HIV testing and linkage services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

HIV remains a global health challenge with a reported 39 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 2022. Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Pacific are home to 82% of PLHIV, where limited access to healthcare resources underscores the urgency of innovative strategies to combat the epidemic effectively. Social network interventions (SNIs) hold promise for improving HIV testing and linkage services by engaging populations at greatest risk. This review evaluates the key design features and effectiveness of SNIs for HIV testing and linkage in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods

We searched four databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science) for the period from 1st January 2003 until 16th June 2023. A combination of the terms “Social Network,” “HIV,” “testing” and “linkage” with an LMIC filter was used. We included interventional study designs that compared an SNI for HIV testing and/or linkage to care against non-network comparator approaches. Narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize the results.

Results

Of the 6763 records, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria; eight were randomized controlled trials, and five were non-randomized designs. Nine studies engaged key populations. The most common strategy involved recruiting and training seeds, who then delivered HIV services to network members. The use of networks varied significantly across the papers. The network approaches used were induction (n = 11), alteration (n = 1) and a combination of individual and segmentation approaches (n = 1). The pooled estimates showed that SNIs had a modest effect on the uptake of HIV testing RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.08−1.17) but the directionality of effect for the proportion newly diagnosed positive (RR 0.88 [95% CI 0.74−1.04]) and linkage to care (RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.86−1.08]) was towards the null.

Discussion

SNIs improved the uptake of HIV testing and exhibit important variability in their design.

Conclusions

There is a need for more studies designed to capture the complex relational dynamics of network interventions and to provide strong evidence on their isolated effects. Additionally, it is necessary to expand the use of network approaches to other priority populations.

PROSPERO Number

CRD42023434770

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信