射频消融技术在关节镜下膝关节半月板切除术中的应用

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Amber Carroll B.S., Chris Brice P.T., D.P.T., Chaitu Malempati D.O.
{"title":"射频消融技术在关节镜下膝关节半月板切除术中的应用","authors":"Amber Carroll B.S.,&nbsp;Chris Brice P.T., D.P.T.,&nbsp;Chaitu Malempati D.O.","doi":"10.1016/j.eats.2024.103316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite mixed responses in the literature regarding knee arthroscopies, radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a preferred method for partial meniscectomy of the knee. This technique is believed to offer advantages over traditional shaving methods, such as reduced risk of long-term fissure propagation and enhanced precision. However, existing literature does not yield a conclusive status of RF’s risk-benefit profile, contributing to a mixed response to its recognized utility and safety in the arthroscopic community. This article details a procedure for performing partial meniscectomy with RF ablation using a feedback-controlled bipolar RF device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand; ArthroCare/Smith &amp; Nephew, Austin, TX), with a focus on parameters that can influence intervention safety. These parameters include device-specific factors such as energy transmission type and field density, as well as surgeon-specific factors such as rest/shutoff time, translation speed, and instrumentation depth. Postoperative care typically involves physical therapy, emphasizing early mobilization and strengthening exercises to ensure optimal recovery. Although our clinic has observed positive results with feedback-controlled bipolar RF for partial meniscectomy, further studies are necessary to conclusively determine the risk-benefit profile of this technique, including long-term follow-up to assess durability and patient satisfaction. Additionally, comparisons with other techniques could provide a more comprehensive understanding of its efficacy and overall impact on patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47827,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":"Article 103316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiofrequency Controlled Ablation Technique for Arthroscopic Meniscectomy of the Knee\",\"authors\":\"Amber Carroll B.S.,&nbsp;Chris Brice P.T., D.P.T.,&nbsp;Chaitu Malempati D.O.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eats.2024.103316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite mixed responses in the literature regarding knee arthroscopies, radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a preferred method for partial meniscectomy of the knee. This technique is believed to offer advantages over traditional shaving methods, such as reduced risk of long-term fissure propagation and enhanced precision. However, existing literature does not yield a conclusive status of RF’s risk-benefit profile, contributing to a mixed response to its recognized utility and safety in the arthroscopic community. This article details a procedure for performing partial meniscectomy with RF ablation using a feedback-controlled bipolar RF device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand; ArthroCare/Smith &amp; Nephew, Austin, TX), with a focus on parameters that can influence intervention safety. These parameters include device-specific factors such as energy transmission type and field density, as well as surgeon-specific factors such as rest/shutoff time, translation speed, and instrumentation depth. Postoperative care typically involves physical therapy, emphasizing early mobilization and strengthening exercises to ensure optimal recovery. Although our clinic has observed positive results with feedback-controlled bipolar RF for partial meniscectomy, further studies are necessary to conclusively determine the risk-benefit profile of this technique, including long-term follow-up to assess durability and patient satisfaction. Additionally, comparisons with other techniques could provide a more comprehensive understanding of its efficacy and overall impact on patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Techniques\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 103316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212628724004699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212628724004699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管文献中关于膝关节镜的反应不一,射频(RF)消融仍然是膝关节半月板部分切除术的首选方法。该技术被认为比传统的剃须方法具有优势,例如降低了长期裂缝扩展的风险,提高了精度。然而,现有的文献并没有得出射频的风险-收益概况的结论性状态,导致其在关节镜界公认的效用和安全性反应不一。本文详细介绍了使用反馈控制的双极射频设备(WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand;ArthroCare /史密斯,侄子,奥斯汀,德克萨斯州),重点关注影响干预安全性的参数。这些参数包括特定于设备的因素,如能量传输类型和场密度,以及特定于外科医生的因素,如休息/关闭时间、平移速度和仪器深度。术后护理通常包括物理治疗,强调早期活动和加强锻炼,以确保最佳的恢复。虽然我们的诊所已经观察到反馈控制双极射频治疗半月板部分切除术的积极结果,但需要进一步的研究来最终确定该技术的风险-收益情况,包括长期随访以评估持久性和患者满意度。此外,与其他技术的比较可以更全面地了解其疗效和对患者预后的总体影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiofrequency Controlled Ablation Technique for Arthroscopic Meniscectomy of the Knee
Despite mixed responses in the literature regarding knee arthroscopies, radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a preferred method for partial meniscectomy of the knee. This technique is believed to offer advantages over traditional shaving methods, such as reduced risk of long-term fissure propagation and enhanced precision. However, existing literature does not yield a conclusive status of RF’s risk-benefit profile, contributing to a mixed response to its recognized utility and safety in the arthroscopic community. This article details a procedure for performing partial meniscectomy with RF ablation using a feedback-controlled bipolar RF device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand; ArthroCare/Smith & Nephew, Austin, TX), with a focus on parameters that can influence intervention safety. These parameters include device-specific factors such as energy transmission type and field density, as well as surgeon-specific factors such as rest/shutoff time, translation speed, and instrumentation depth. Postoperative care typically involves physical therapy, emphasizing early mobilization and strengthening exercises to ensure optimal recovery. Although our clinic has observed positive results with feedback-controlled bipolar RF for partial meniscectomy, further studies are necessary to conclusively determine the risk-benefit profile of this technique, including long-term follow-up to assess durability and patient satisfaction. Additionally, comparisons with other techniques could provide a more comprehensive understanding of its efficacy and overall impact on patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroscopy Techniques
Arthroscopy Techniques ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信