人工智能注入的知识和绿色智力资本:来自RBV-KBV模型和可持续发展文化的刺激会计绩效的途径

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan , Jackie Zhanbiao Li
{"title":"人工智能注入的知识和绿色智力资本:来自RBV-KBV模型和可持续发展文化的刺激会计绩效的途径","authors":"Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan ,&nbsp;Jackie Zhanbiao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AI-infused knowledge (AIK) systems have the potential to transform the way firms operate, providing dynamics for optimizing processes, enhancing decision-making, and fostering innovation. This shift can play a vital role in service-oriented contexts, like accounting firms. In this study, we aim to explore how AIK can drive green intellectual capital (GIC) aspects, spurring accounting firms’ performance related to environmental and sustainable practices. Drawn from the resource-based view (RBV) and knowledge-based view (KBV), sustainability culture (SUC) is integrated into the model as a moderator variable to provide an in-depth understanding of this matter. The study adopted a quantitative approach, data was collected through an online survey distributed to accounting professionals. The analysis shows interesting outcomes: AIK positively and significantly affected the internal dimensions of GIC, green human capital (GHC) and green structural capital (GSC) within accounting firms, while green rational capital (GRC) had no effect. In turn, these two internal dimensions, GHC and GSC, had a significant impact on accounting performance across various aspects, including efficiency, accuracy, compliance with environmental standards, innovation in reporting, and timeliness. Intriguingly, SUC was found to significantly moderate the association between GIC dimensions and accounting firm performance. The results of this research offer actionable insights for stakeholders and decision-makers, including accounting firms, clients, and the community at large. Accounting firms are highly recommended to adopt AI-infused platforms to foster GIC dynamics, specifically GHC and GSC. AI-infused knowledge tools have the potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, innovation in reporting, compliance with sustainability standards and timeliness, thus leading to better overall performance. Although service-oriented contexts, like accounting, have the potential to substantially benefit from GIC practices, research in such a significant discipline has been remarkably scarce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102913"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-infused knowledge and green intellectual capital: pathways to spur accounting performance drawn from RBV-KBV model and sustainability culture\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan ,&nbsp;Jackie Zhanbiao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>AI-infused knowledge (AIK) systems have the potential to transform the way firms operate, providing dynamics for optimizing processes, enhancing decision-making, and fostering innovation. This shift can play a vital role in service-oriented contexts, like accounting firms. In this study, we aim to explore how AIK can drive green intellectual capital (GIC) aspects, spurring accounting firms’ performance related to environmental and sustainable practices. Drawn from the resource-based view (RBV) and knowledge-based view (KBV), sustainability culture (SUC) is integrated into the model as a moderator variable to provide an in-depth understanding of this matter. The study adopted a quantitative approach, data was collected through an online survey distributed to accounting professionals. The analysis shows interesting outcomes: AIK positively and significantly affected the internal dimensions of GIC, green human capital (GHC) and green structural capital (GSC) within accounting firms, while green rational capital (GRC) had no effect. In turn, these two internal dimensions, GHC and GSC, had a significant impact on accounting performance across various aspects, including efficiency, accuracy, compliance with environmental standards, innovation in reporting, and timeliness. Intriguingly, SUC was found to significantly moderate the association between GIC dimensions and accounting firm performance. The results of this research offer actionable insights for stakeholders and decision-makers, including accounting firms, clients, and the community at large. Accounting firms are highly recommended to adopt AI-infused platforms to foster GIC dynamics, specifically GHC and GSC. AI-infused knowledge tools have the potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, innovation in reporting, compliance with sustainability standards and timeliness, thus leading to better overall performance. Although service-oriented contexts, like accounting, have the potential to substantially benefit from GIC practices, research in such a significant discipline has been remarkably scarce.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能注入的知识(AIK)系统有可能改变公司的运营方式,为优化流程、加强决策和促进创新提供动力。这种转变可以在面向服务的环境中发挥至关重要的作用,比如会计师事务所。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨AIK如何推动绿色智力资本(GIC)方面,刺激会计师事务所在环境和可持续实践方面的绩效。从资源基础观点(RBV)和知识基础观点(KBV)出发,可持续发展文化(SUC)作为调节变量被整合到模型中,以提供对这一问题的深入理解。该研究采用了定量方法,数据是通过在线调查收集的,分发给会计专业人员。分析结果显示:AIK对会计师事务所内部GIC、绿色人力资本(GHC)和绿色结构资本(GSC)的内部维度有显著的正向影响,而绿色理性资本(GRC)没有影响。反过来,这两个内部维度,即GHC和GSC,对会计绩效在各个方面产生了重大影响,包括效率、准确性、对环境标准的遵守、报告的创新和及时性。有趣的是,SUC被发现显著调节GIC维度与会计师事务所绩效之间的关联。这项研究的结果为利益相关者和决策者提供了可操作的见解,包括会计师事务所、客户和整个社区。强烈建议会计师事务所采用人工智能注入的平台来促进GIC的动态,特别是GHC和GSC。注入人工智能的知识工具有可能提高效率、准确性、报告创新、符合可持续性标准和及时性,从而提高整体绩效。尽管面向服务的上下文(如会计)有可能从GIC实践中获得实质性的好处,但对这样一个重要学科的研究却非常少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-infused knowledge and green intellectual capital: pathways to spur accounting performance drawn from RBV-KBV model and sustainability culture
AI-infused knowledge (AIK) systems have the potential to transform the way firms operate, providing dynamics for optimizing processes, enhancing decision-making, and fostering innovation. This shift can play a vital role in service-oriented contexts, like accounting firms. In this study, we aim to explore how AIK can drive green intellectual capital (GIC) aspects, spurring accounting firms’ performance related to environmental and sustainable practices. Drawn from the resource-based view (RBV) and knowledge-based view (KBV), sustainability culture (SUC) is integrated into the model as a moderator variable to provide an in-depth understanding of this matter. The study adopted a quantitative approach, data was collected through an online survey distributed to accounting professionals. The analysis shows interesting outcomes: AIK positively and significantly affected the internal dimensions of GIC, green human capital (GHC) and green structural capital (GSC) within accounting firms, while green rational capital (GRC) had no effect. In turn, these two internal dimensions, GHC and GSC, had a significant impact on accounting performance across various aspects, including efficiency, accuracy, compliance with environmental standards, innovation in reporting, and timeliness. Intriguingly, SUC was found to significantly moderate the association between GIC dimensions and accounting firm performance. The results of this research offer actionable insights for stakeholders and decision-makers, including accounting firms, clients, and the community at large. Accounting firms are highly recommended to adopt AI-infused platforms to foster GIC dynamics, specifically GHC and GSC. AI-infused knowledge tools have the potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, innovation in reporting, compliance with sustainability standards and timeliness, thus leading to better overall performance. Although service-oriented contexts, like accounting, have the potential to substantially benefit from GIC practices, research in such a significant discipline has been remarkably scarce.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信