食草动物和种子库将限制濒危亚热带雨林的再生和恢复

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1111/aec.70057
K. French, C. Bland, J. Dawson, M. Dawson, J. Lemmon
{"title":"食草动物和种子库将限制濒危亚热带雨林的再生和恢复","authors":"K. French,&nbsp;C. Bland,&nbsp;J. Dawson,&nbsp;M. Dawson,&nbsp;J. Lemmon","doi":"10.1111/aec.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Disturbances are an essential component of forest functionality and composition; however, when communities become disrupted, these disturbances may restrict the growth and productivity of species present. Illawarra subtropical rainforest (ISRF) is a threatened ecological community that is influenced by both native and exotic vertebrate herbivores and exotic plant pressures. The ability of ISRF to regenerate following the removal of large herbivores was assessed in fenced and unfenced sites within fragments of rainforest. To investigate the extent to which herbivory was limiting the restoration of ISRF, five native seedlings of each of eight species were planted at six sites, and growth and herbivore activity was compared between fenced and unfenced sites. We investigated seed bank capacity and composition to determine whether recruitment limitation is also preventing regeneration. Over 46 weeks, seedlings in unfenced sites experienced significantly lower growth, which varied amongst species and sites. High activity of feral deer and swamp wallabies caused significant reductions in seedling heights and the number of leaves. Herbivores reduced the growth of seedlings of <i>Brachychiton acerifolius, Planchonella australis</i>, and <i>Breynia oblongifolia</i> more than other species. <i>Pittosporum multiflorum</i> seedlings were not eaten. Only 297 seeds (10% of all seeds germinating) of 21 native species typical of ISRF communities germinated in the seed bank germination trial in the glasshouse. Most native species were missing, reflecting poor recruitment opportunities from a soil-stored seed bank. Seed banks were dominated by 21 exotic species (2125 seedlings—74% of total), presenting a significant risk to the regeneration of the community. Our results indicated that ISRF communities are unlikely to regenerate naturally and require active planting coupled with effective protective measures from all herbivores to restore fragmented vegetation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbivory and Seed Banks Will Limit Regeneration and Restoration of an Endangered Subtropical Rainforest\",\"authors\":\"K. French,&nbsp;C. Bland,&nbsp;J. Dawson,&nbsp;M. Dawson,&nbsp;J. Lemmon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Disturbances are an essential component of forest functionality and composition; however, when communities become disrupted, these disturbances may restrict the growth and productivity of species present. Illawarra subtropical rainforest (ISRF) is a threatened ecological community that is influenced by both native and exotic vertebrate herbivores and exotic plant pressures. The ability of ISRF to regenerate following the removal of large herbivores was assessed in fenced and unfenced sites within fragments of rainforest. To investigate the extent to which herbivory was limiting the restoration of ISRF, five native seedlings of each of eight species were planted at six sites, and growth and herbivore activity was compared between fenced and unfenced sites. We investigated seed bank capacity and composition to determine whether recruitment limitation is also preventing regeneration. Over 46 weeks, seedlings in unfenced sites experienced significantly lower growth, which varied amongst species and sites. High activity of feral deer and swamp wallabies caused significant reductions in seedling heights and the number of leaves. Herbivores reduced the growth of seedlings of <i>Brachychiton acerifolius, Planchonella australis</i>, and <i>Breynia oblongifolia</i> more than other species. <i>Pittosporum multiflorum</i> seedlings were not eaten. Only 297 seeds (10% of all seeds germinating) of 21 native species typical of ISRF communities germinated in the seed bank germination trial in the glasshouse. Most native species were missing, reflecting poor recruitment opportunities from a soil-stored seed bank. Seed banks were dominated by 21 exotic species (2125 seedlings—74% of total), presenting a significant risk to the regeneration of the community. Our results indicated that ISRF communities are unlikely to regenerate naturally and require active planting coupled with effective protective measures from all herbivores to restore fragmented vegetation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干扰是森林功能和组成的重要组成部分;然而,当群落被破坏时,这些干扰可能会限制现有物种的生长和生产力。伊拉瓦拉亚热带雨林(ISRF)是一个受到本地和外来脊椎动物、食草动物和外来植物压力共同影响的濒危生态群落。在雨林碎片内的围栏和非围栏地点评估了大型食草动物移除后ISRF的再生能力。为了研究草食行为在多大程度上限制了ISRF的恢复,在6个地点种植了8个物种的5个本地幼苗,并比较了围栏和非围栏地点的生长和草食活动。我们调查了种子库的容量和组成,以确定招募限制是否也阻碍了再生。在46周内,无围栏场地的幼苗生长明显较低,且在不同的物种和场地之间存在差异。野鹿和沼泽小袋鼠的高活动导致幼苗高度和叶片数量显著减少。草食动物对针叶短胎藻、南跖球藻和长叶布雷氏菌幼苗生长的抑制作用大于其他物种。多花Pittosporum multiflower幼苗未被食用。在种子库温室萌发试验中,21个典型ISRF群落的本地物种只有297颗种子萌发,占萌发总数的10%。大多数本地物种缺失,反映了土壤储存种子库的招募机会不足。种子库以21种外来种(2125株,占总数的74%)为主,对群落的更新存在较大风险。我们的研究结果表明,ISRF群落不太可能自然再生,需要积极的种植以及所有食草动物的有效保护措施来恢复破碎的植被。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Herbivory and Seed Banks Will Limit Regeneration and Restoration of an Endangered Subtropical Rainforest

Herbivory and Seed Banks Will Limit Regeneration and Restoration of an Endangered Subtropical Rainforest

Disturbances are an essential component of forest functionality and composition; however, when communities become disrupted, these disturbances may restrict the growth and productivity of species present. Illawarra subtropical rainforest (ISRF) is a threatened ecological community that is influenced by both native and exotic vertebrate herbivores and exotic plant pressures. The ability of ISRF to regenerate following the removal of large herbivores was assessed in fenced and unfenced sites within fragments of rainforest. To investigate the extent to which herbivory was limiting the restoration of ISRF, five native seedlings of each of eight species were planted at six sites, and growth and herbivore activity was compared between fenced and unfenced sites. We investigated seed bank capacity and composition to determine whether recruitment limitation is also preventing regeneration. Over 46 weeks, seedlings in unfenced sites experienced significantly lower growth, which varied amongst species and sites. High activity of feral deer and swamp wallabies caused significant reductions in seedling heights and the number of leaves. Herbivores reduced the growth of seedlings of Brachychiton acerifolius, Planchonella australis, and Breynia oblongifolia more than other species. Pittosporum multiflorum seedlings were not eaten. Only 297 seeds (10% of all seeds germinating) of 21 native species typical of ISRF communities germinated in the seed bank germination trial in the glasshouse. Most native species were missing, reflecting poor recruitment opportunities from a soil-stored seed bank. Seed banks were dominated by 21 exotic species (2125 seedlings—74% of total), presenting a significant risk to the regeneration of the community. Our results indicated that ISRF communities are unlikely to regenerate naturally and require active planting coupled with effective protective measures from all herbivores to restore fragmented vegetation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信