Hanna Järvenoja, Tiina Törmänen, Marjo Turunen, Emma Lehtoaho
{"title":"我们会成功:不同的成功期望和社会共享规则如何塑造学生的协作学习","authors":"Hanna Järvenoja, Tiina Törmänen, Marjo Turunen, Emma Lehtoaho","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Collaborative learning offers benefits, but its potential is often undermined by motivational challenges. This study uses the situated expectancy-value theory to explore how students' expectancies for success relate to group-level regulation of learning during collaborative interactions. The study considers success expectancies both as a motivational condition for and a product of group-level regulation during collaborative learning. Success expectancies are examined both as a condition for and a product of regulated learning, influencing students' engagement in motivation regulation and being shaped by it in turn.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to understand the interconnection between group-level regulation and students' success expectancies during collaborative learning and how this sets the stage for learning outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-eight eighth graders engaged in a four-phase collaborative science task in small groups. Video recordings captured the groups' regulation, and each member completed situational self-reports during different task phases. Stimulated recall interviews conducted after the task explored students' subjective justifications for variations in their situational expectancies for success. Employing multi-channel sequence mining and clustering with mixture hidden Markov models, the study identified two types of group-level regulation sequences: engaged in group-level regulation and occasional cognitive group-level regulation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings revealed characteristics of group-level regulation sequences and showed that frequent engagement in cognitive and motivation regulation is associated with more positive success expectancies during and after the task. Success expectancies emerged as both a motivational condition and product of SSRL, correlating with task performance. Qualitative interview findings provided further insights into students' expectancies, shedding light on the motivational dynamics of collaborative learning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We Will Succeed: How Varying Success Expectancies and Socially Shared Regulation Shape Students' Collaborative Learning\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Järvenoja, Tiina Törmänen, Marjo Turunen, Emma Lehtoaho\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Collaborative learning offers benefits, but its potential is often undermined by motivational challenges. This study uses the situated expectancy-value theory to explore how students' expectancies for success relate to group-level regulation of learning during collaborative interactions. The study considers success expectancies both as a motivational condition for and a product of group-level regulation during collaborative learning. Success expectancies are examined both as a condition for and a product of regulated learning, influencing students' engagement in motivation regulation and being shaped by it in turn.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to understand the interconnection between group-level regulation and students' success expectancies during collaborative learning and how this sets the stage for learning outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-eight eighth graders engaged in a four-phase collaborative science task in small groups. Video recordings captured the groups' regulation, and each member completed situational self-reports during different task phases. Stimulated recall interviews conducted after the task explored students' subjective justifications for variations in their situational expectancies for success. Employing multi-channel sequence mining and clustering with mixture hidden Markov models, the study identified two types of group-level regulation sequences: engaged in group-level regulation and occasional cognitive group-level regulation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings revealed characteristics of group-level regulation sequences and showed that frequent engagement in cognitive and motivation regulation is associated with more positive success expectancies during and after the task. Success expectancies emerged as both a motivational condition and product of SSRL, correlating with task performance. Qualitative interview findings provided further insights into students' expectancies, shedding light on the motivational dynamics of collaborative learning.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
We Will Succeed: How Varying Success Expectancies and Socially Shared Regulation Shape Students' Collaborative Learning
Background
Collaborative learning offers benefits, but its potential is often undermined by motivational challenges. This study uses the situated expectancy-value theory to explore how students' expectancies for success relate to group-level regulation of learning during collaborative interactions. The study considers success expectancies both as a motivational condition for and a product of group-level regulation during collaborative learning. Success expectancies are examined both as a condition for and a product of regulated learning, influencing students' engagement in motivation regulation and being shaped by it in turn.
Objectives
This study aims to understand the interconnection between group-level regulation and students' success expectancies during collaborative learning and how this sets the stage for learning outcomes.
Methods
Forty-eight eighth graders engaged in a four-phase collaborative science task in small groups. Video recordings captured the groups' regulation, and each member completed situational self-reports during different task phases. Stimulated recall interviews conducted after the task explored students' subjective justifications for variations in their situational expectancies for success. Employing multi-channel sequence mining and clustering with mixture hidden Markov models, the study identified two types of group-level regulation sequences: engaged in group-level regulation and occasional cognitive group-level regulation.
Results and Conclusions
Findings revealed characteristics of group-level regulation sequences and showed that frequent engagement in cognitive and motivation regulation is associated with more positive success expectancies during and after the task. Success expectancies emerged as both a motivational condition and product of SSRL, correlating with task performance. Qualitative interview findings provided further insights into students' expectancies, shedding light on the motivational dynamics of collaborative learning.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope