{"title":"有意生育的美丽新世界","authors":"Yehezkel Margalit","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The past years have born witness to dramatic and rapid technological changes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to include mitochondrial replacement and artificial gametes, which by fragmenting traditional aspects of parenthood have challenged our deepest conceptions of what it means to be a parent. These two cutting-edge reproductive innovations raise a variety of ethical and legal dilemmas, inter alia, the determination of legal parenthood. This article will explore the medical background of these practices and the main dilemmas in determining parenthood in each scenario. In the context of mitochondrial replacement, it explores whether the nuclear mother or the mitochondrial mother is the “real” mother of the resulting child. Likewise, artificial gametes challenge us to define the genetic progenitor who provided the raw material that will eventually produce an artificial sperm and/or egg. Is he a genetic parent, similar to any “traditional” sperm or egg provider? Or is he a mere third party who is, legally, a total stranger to the child. After exposing shortcomings in non-contractual models of legal parenthood, I endorse intentional parenthood as a superior normative model. Normatively, it is an appropriate, just and flexible doctrine for resolving the various modern dilemmas that surface in the context of different ART, including these two latest innovations previewed here. First, I will elaborate on current applications of intentional parenthood in ART and specifically about children resulting from mitochondrial replacement or artificial gametes. Afterwards, I will suggest ways to practically implement intentional parenthood in the context of these two complex and challenging procedures, including unique suggestions of dual maternity, three legal parents, and “quasi” parents with a variety of parental statuses. I will then discuss how intentional parenthood remains available to service the challenges posed by future and as-yet-unknown reproductive practices, as in this steadily evolving field, the future is always (almost) here.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 2","pages":"240-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The brave new world of intentional parenthood\",\"authors\":\"Yehezkel Margalit\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcre.12853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The past years have born witness to dramatic and rapid technological changes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to include mitochondrial replacement and artificial gametes, which by fragmenting traditional aspects of parenthood have challenged our deepest conceptions of what it means to be a parent. These two cutting-edge reproductive innovations raise a variety of ethical and legal dilemmas, inter alia, the determination of legal parenthood. This article will explore the medical background of these practices and the main dilemmas in determining parenthood in each scenario. In the context of mitochondrial replacement, it explores whether the nuclear mother or the mitochondrial mother is the “real” mother of the resulting child. Likewise, artificial gametes challenge us to define the genetic progenitor who provided the raw material that will eventually produce an artificial sperm and/or egg. Is he a genetic parent, similar to any “traditional” sperm or egg provider? Or is he a mere third party who is, legally, a total stranger to the child. After exposing shortcomings in non-contractual models of legal parenthood, I endorse intentional parenthood as a superior normative model. Normatively, it is an appropriate, just and flexible doctrine for resolving the various modern dilemmas that surface in the context of different ART, including these two latest innovations previewed here. First, I will elaborate on current applications of intentional parenthood in ART and specifically about children resulting from mitochondrial replacement or artificial gametes. Afterwards, I will suggest ways to practically implement intentional parenthood in the context of these two complex and challenging procedures, including unique suggestions of dual maternity, three legal parents, and “quasi” parents with a variety of parental statuses. I will then discuss how intentional parenthood remains available to service the challenges posed by future and as-yet-unknown reproductive practices, as in this steadily evolving field, the future is always (almost) here.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Court Review\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"240-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Court Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
过去几年来,辅助生殖技术(ART)发生了巨大而迅速的技术变革,包括线粒体置换和人工配子。这两项尖端的生殖创新技术引发了各种伦理和法律难题,其中包括如何确定合法的父母身份。本文将探讨这些做法的医学背景,以及在每种情况下确定父母身份的主要困境。就线粒体置换而言,本文将探讨核母亲还是线粒体母亲才是所生孩子的 "真正 "母亲。同样,人工配子也对我们提出了挑战,即如何定义提供原材料、最终产生人工精子和/或卵子的遗传祖先。他是与任何 "传统 "精子或卵子提供者类似的遗传父母吗?或者他只是一个第三方,在法律上与孩子完全陌生。在揭示了非契约模式的法定父母身份的缺陷之后,我赞同意向父母身份是一种更优越的规范模式。从规范上讲,它是一种适当、公正和灵活的理论,可以解决在不同 ART(包括本文预览的这两项最新创新)背景下出现的各种现代困境。首先,我将阐述目前在 ART 中有意为人父母的应用,特别是线粒体置换或人工配子所产生的子女。随后,我将就如何在这两种复杂而具有挑战性的程序中切实落实意向亲子关系提出建议,包括关于双重母性、三位合法父母以及具有各种父母身份的 "准 "父母的独特建议。然后,我将讨论如何继续采用意向父母身份来应对未来和尚未知晓的生育实践所带来的挑战,因为在这个稳步发展的领域,未来总是(几乎)在这里。
The past years have born witness to dramatic and rapid technological changes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to include mitochondrial replacement and artificial gametes, which by fragmenting traditional aspects of parenthood have challenged our deepest conceptions of what it means to be a parent. These two cutting-edge reproductive innovations raise a variety of ethical and legal dilemmas, inter alia, the determination of legal parenthood. This article will explore the medical background of these practices and the main dilemmas in determining parenthood in each scenario. In the context of mitochondrial replacement, it explores whether the nuclear mother or the mitochondrial mother is the “real” mother of the resulting child. Likewise, artificial gametes challenge us to define the genetic progenitor who provided the raw material that will eventually produce an artificial sperm and/or egg. Is he a genetic parent, similar to any “traditional” sperm or egg provider? Or is he a mere third party who is, legally, a total stranger to the child. After exposing shortcomings in non-contractual models of legal parenthood, I endorse intentional parenthood as a superior normative model. Normatively, it is an appropriate, just and flexible doctrine for resolving the various modern dilemmas that surface in the context of different ART, including these two latest innovations previewed here. First, I will elaborate on current applications of intentional parenthood in ART and specifically about children resulting from mitochondrial replacement or artificial gametes. Afterwards, I will suggest ways to practically implement intentional parenthood in the context of these two complex and challenging procedures, including unique suggestions of dual maternity, three legal parents, and “quasi” parents with a variety of parental statuses. I will then discuss how intentional parenthood remains available to service the challenges posed by future and as-yet-unknown reproductive practices, as in this steadily evolving field, the future is always (almost) here.