辞职还原论:重新定义自动化自然资本的数字想象

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Hope Steadman
{"title":"辞职还原论:重新定义自动化自然资本的数字想象","authors":"Hope Steadman","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural capital accounting is widely adopted in the UK as a means of supporting environmental measurement and management, with digital automation technologies increasingly shaping its practice. Natural capital approaches have been critiqued by geographers for being ontologically reductive and for over-privileging certain technocratic knowledges. Nevertheless, this analysis can overlook environmental practitioners’ awareness of and attempts to address these critiques. This paper therefore makes two interventions. It first analyses what it terms the Automated Natural Capital (ANC) imaginary, exploring how stakeholders involved in the development of an ANC tool articulate, experience and envision it. It finds that such tools are indeed founded upon functional relations with nature, failing to acknowledge alternative knowledges, whilst also black boxing the socio-political logics behind the choice of reductionist valuations. Secondly, however, it identifies how and why stakeholders working at a Scottish rewilding site resign themselves to ANC, deemed as necessary to channel attention and support to nature recovery. It conceptualises this as “resigned reductionism”, understood as affectively co-constituting the ANC imaginary. The paper ends by suggesting that resignation is bound up in promises of the future digital optimisation of ANC, which risks displacing transformational alternatives to an unrealised future. It therefore argues for the wider significance of this concept in contemporary environmental governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 104292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resigned reductionism: Reconceptualising digital imaginaries of automated natural capital\",\"authors\":\"Hope Steadman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Natural capital accounting is widely adopted in the UK as a means of supporting environmental measurement and management, with digital automation technologies increasingly shaping its practice. Natural capital approaches have been critiqued by geographers for being ontologically reductive and for over-privileging certain technocratic knowledges. Nevertheless, this analysis can overlook environmental practitioners’ awareness of and attempts to address these critiques. This paper therefore makes two interventions. It first analyses what it terms the Automated Natural Capital (ANC) imaginary, exploring how stakeholders involved in the development of an ANC tool articulate, experience and envision it. It finds that such tools are indeed founded upon functional relations with nature, failing to acknowledge alternative knowledges, whilst also black boxing the socio-political logics behind the choice of reductionist valuations. Secondly, however, it identifies how and why stakeholders working at a Scottish rewilding site resign themselves to ANC, deemed as necessary to channel attention and support to nature recovery. It conceptualises this as “resigned reductionism”, understood as affectively co-constituting the ANC imaginary. The paper ends by suggesting that resignation is bound up in promises of the future digital optimisation of ANC, which risks displacing transformational alternatives to an unrealised future. It therefore argues for the wider significance of this concept in contemporary environmental governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000922\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然资本核算在英国被广泛采用,作为支持环境测量和管理的手段,数字自动化技术日益影响其实践。自然资本方法被地理学家批评为本体论上的简化和对某些技术官僚知识的过度特权。然而,这种分析可能忽略了环境从业者对这些批评的认识和尝试。因此,本文提出了两个干预措施。它首先分析了所谓的自动化自然资本(ANC)想象,探讨了参与ANC工具开发的利益相关者如何表达、体验和设想它。它发现,这些工具确实是建立在与自然的功能关系之上的,没有承认其他知识,同时也把选择还原主义估值背后的社会政治逻辑打上了黑箱。然而,其次,它确定了在苏格兰野化地点工作的利益相关者如何以及为什么放弃了ANC,这被认为是引导对自然恢复的关注和支持所必需的。它将其概念化为“顺从的还原论”,理解为有效地共同构成非国大的想象。论文最后提出,辞职与ANC未来数字化优化的承诺密切相关,这可能会取代转型替代方案,导致未来无法实现。因此,它认为这一概念在当代环境治理中具有更广泛的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resigned reductionism: Reconceptualising digital imaginaries of automated natural capital
Natural capital accounting is widely adopted in the UK as a means of supporting environmental measurement and management, with digital automation technologies increasingly shaping its practice. Natural capital approaches have been critiqued by geographers for being ontologically reductive and for over-privileging certain technocratic knowledges. Nevertheless, this analysis can overlook environmental practitioners’ awareness of and attempts to address these critiques. This paper therefore makes two interventions. It first analyses what it terms the Automated Natural Capital (ANC) imaginary, exploring how stakeholders involved in the development of an ANC tool articulate, experience and envision it. It finds that such tools are indeed founded upon functional relations with nature, failing to acknowledge alternative knowledges, whilst also black boxing the socio-political logics behind the choice of reductionist valuations. Secondly, however, it identifies how and why stakeholders working at a Scottish rewilding site resign themselves to ANC, deemed as necessary to channel attention and support to nature recovery. It conceptualises this as “resigned reductionism”, understood as affectively co-constituting the ANC imaginary. The paper ends by suggesting that resignation is bound up in promises of the future digital optimisation of ANC, which risks displacing transformational alternatives to an unrealised future. It therefore argues for the wider significance of this concept in contemporary environmental governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信