考虑决策者属性偏好的三向决策效用模型

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yiping Zhang , Chunfang Chen , Xiangjun Li
{"title":"考虑决策者属性偏好的三向决策效用模型","authors":"Yiping Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunfang Chen ,&nbsp;Xiangjun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the study of Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making (MAGDM), determining the weights of decision-makers is a core aspect, as it directly affects the fairness and rationality of decision outcomes. The varying risk preferences of decision-makers also significantly impact the final decision. The Three-way Decision (TWD) utility model, a powerful tool for dealing with uncertainty and fuzziness, has shown its unique advantages in solving classification problems, primarily considering conditional probability and utility functions. This paper first proposes an optimization model for updating decision-makers’ weights based on their objective weights and subjective information. The Newton iteration method is employed to find the optimal solution iteratively. Subsequently, a method for determining conditional attributes using grey relational analysis (GRA) is introduced. And a new utility function is developed to reflect the individual risk attitudes and attribute preferences of decision-makers. Based on these developments, the paper constructs a new TWD utility model tailored for MAGDM. The paper demonstrates the model’s effectiveness and superiority through a case study involving real-world data. By comparing it with other methods, the model’s advantages are highlighted. A sensitivity analysis of the model’s parameters is conducted to test its robustness to changes, and the model is applied to large datasets, validating its potential and applicability in practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 127506"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel three-way decision utility model considering decision-maker’s attribute preferences\",\"authors\":\"Yiping Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunfang Chen ,&nbsp;Xiangjun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the study of Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making (MAGDM), determining the weights of decision-makers is a core aspect, as it directly affects the fairness and rationality of decision outcomes. The varying risk preferences of decision-makers also significantly impact the final decision. The Three-way Decision (TWD) utility model, a powerful tool for dealing with uncertainty and fuzziness, has shown its unique advantages in solving classification problems, primarily considering conditional probability and utility functions. This paper first proposes an optimization model for updating decision-makers’ weights based on their objective weights and subjective information. The Newton iteration method is employed to find the optimal solution iteratively. Subsequently, a method for determining conditional attributes using grey relational analysis (GRA) is introduced. And a new utility function is developed to reflect the individual risk attitudes and attribute preferences of decision-makers. Based on these developments, the paper constructs a new TWD utility model tailored for MAGDM. The paper demonstrates the model’s effectiveness and superiority through a case study involving real-world data. By comparing it with other methods, the model’s advantages are highlighted. A sensitivity analysis of the model’s parameters is conducted to test its robustness to changes, and the model is applied to large datasets, validating its potential and applicability in practical applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Systems with Applications\",\"volume\":\"282 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Systems with Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425011285\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425011285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在多属性群体决策(MAGDM)研究中,决策者权重的确定是一个核心方面,它直接影响决策结果的公平性和合理性。决策者不同的风险偏好也会显著影响最终决策。三向决策(TWD)是一种处理不确定性和模糊性的有力工具,在解决分类问题时主要考虑条件概率和效用函数,显示出其独特的优势。本文首先提出了一种基于客观权重和主观信息的决策者权重更新优化模型。采用牛顿迭代法迭代求最优解。随后,介绍了一种利用灰色关联分析(GRA)确定条件属性的方法。建立了反映决策者个体风险态度和属性偏好的效用函数。在此基础上,本文构建了一种适合MAGDM的TWD实用新型。通过实际数据的实例分析,验证了该模型的有效性和优越性。通过与其他方法的比较,突出了该模型的优点。对模型参数进行敏感性分析,检验模型对变化的鲁棒性,并将模型应用于大型数据集,验证了模型在实际应用中的潜力和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel three-way decision utility model considering decision-maker’s attribute preferences
In the study of Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making (MAGDM), determining the weights of decision-makers is a core aspect, as it directly affects the fairness and rationality of decision outcomes. The varying risk preferences of decision-makers also significantly impact the final decision. The Three-way Decision (TWD) utility model, a powerful tool for dealing with uncertainty and fuzziness, has shown its unique advantages in solving classification problems, primarily considering conditional probability and utility functions. This paper first proposes an optimization model for updating decision-makers’ weights based on their objective weights and subjective information. The Newton iteration method is employed to find the optimal solution iteratively. Subsequently, a method for determining conditional attributes using grey relational analysis (GRA) is introduced. And a new utility function is developed to reflect the individual risk attitudes and attribute preferences of decision-makers. Based on these developments, the paper constructs a new TWD utility model tailored for MAGDM. The paper demonstrates the model’s effectiveness and superiority through a case study involving real-world data. By comparing it with other methods, the model’s advantages are highlighted. A sensitivity analysis of the model’s parameters is conducted to test its robustness to changes, and the model is applied to large datasets, validating its potential and applicability in practical applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信