Wala Mehros , Rowayd Gobouri , Omar Turkistani , Abdulaziz Hinnawi , Omar Alahmary , Ahmed Shams , Jaser Tashkandi , Amal Al Somairi , Amal Hanjour , Syed Sameer Aga , Hatim Al-Jifree
{"title":"多个新辅助化疗周期对晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的影响:单中心经验","authors":"Wala Mehros , Rowayd Gobouri , Omar Turkistani , Abdulaziz Hinnawi , Omar Alahmary , Ahmed Shams , Jaser Tashkandi , Amal Al Somairi , Amal Hanjour , Syed Sameer Aga , Hatim Al-Jifree","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Three to four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval debulking surgery is a common treatment of ovarian cancer. This study aimed to determine the impact of increasing the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles on overall survival), progression-free survival, and disease responses in patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-eight patients who underwent NACT for advanced-stage EOC were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study conducted at Princess Noorah Oncology Center and King Abdulaziz Medical City between 2010 and 2021 and divided into two groups. Patients in the first group received fewer than six cycles of NACT while those the second group were treated with six or more cycles. Differences in the OS, PFS, and NACT responses were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median OS was 22.50 months ([IQR], 35.75 months) among patients in the group who received fewer than six cycles of NACT and 29.5 months (IQR, 28.75 months) for those treated with six cycles or more (<em>P</em> = 0.67). The median PFS was 12 months (IQR, 16) for the group that received fewer than six cycles, and nine months (IQR, 21.5 months) for patients assigned to the group that received six or more cycles (<em>P</em> = 0.88). Six of the patients from the group that received fewer than six cycles of NACT and five of the patients from the group that received six cycles or more achieved a complete response to therapy (<em>P</em> = 0.81).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Increasing the number of NACT cycles did not significantly impact OS, PFS, or the overall response to therapy. However, the study's small patient population presents a limitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100904"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of multiple neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A single center experience\",\"authors\":\"Wala Mehros , Rowayd Gobouri , Omar Turkistani , Abdulaziz Hinnawi , Omar Alahmary , Ahmed Shams , Jaser Tashkandi , Amal Al Somairi , Amal Hanjour , Syed Sameer Aga , Hatim Al-Jifree\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Three to four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval debulking surgery is a common treatment of ovarian cancer. This study aimed to determine the impact of increasing the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles on overall survival), progression-free survival, and disease responses in patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-eight patients who underwent NACT for advanced-stage EOC were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study conducted at Princess Noorah Oncology Center and King Abdulaziz Medical City between 2010 and 2021 and divided into two groups. Patients in the first group received fewer than six cycles of NACT while those the second group were treated with six or more cycles. Differences in the OS, PFS, and NACT responses were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median OS was 22.50 months ([IQR], 35.75 months) among patients in the group who received fewer than six cycles of NACT and 29.5 months (IQR, 28.75 months) for those treated with six cycles or more (<em>P</em> = 0.67). The median PFS was 12 months (IQR, 16) for the group that received fewer than six cycles, and nine months (IQR, 21.5 months) for patients assigned to the group that received six or more cycles (<em>P</em> = 0.88). Six of the patients from the group that received fewer than six cycles of NACT and five of the patients from the group that received six cycles or more achieved a complete response to therapy (<em>P</em> = 0.81).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Increasing the number of NACT cycles did not significantly impact OS, PFS, or the overall response to therapy. However, the study's small patient population presents a limitation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225000395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of multiple neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A single center experience
Aim
Three to four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval debulking surgery is a common treatment of ovarian cancer. This study aimed to determine the impact of increasing the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles on overall survival), progression-free survival, and disease responses in patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Methods
Twenty-eight patients who underwent NACT for advanced-stage EOC were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study conducted at Princess Noorah Oncology Center and King Abdulaziz Medical City between 2010 and 2021 and divided into two groups. Patients in the first group received fewer than six cycles of NACT while those the second group were treated with six or more cycles. Differences in the OS, PFS, and NACT responses were compared.
Results
The median OS was 22.50 months ([IQR], 35.75 months) among patients in the group who received fewer than six cycles of NACT and 29.5 months (IQR, 28.75 months) for those treated with six cycles or more (P = 0.67). The median PFS was 12 months (IQR, 16) for the group that received fewer than six cycles, and nine months (IQR, 21.5 months) for patients assigned to the group that received six or more cycles (P = 0.88). Six of the patients from the group that received fewer than six cycles of NACT and five of the patients from the group that received six cycles or more achieved a complete response to therapy (P = 0.81).
Conclusion
Increasing the number of NACT cycles did not significantly impact OS, PFS, or the overall response to therapy. However, the study's small patient population presents a limitation.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.