Yu-Lan Li , Giovanni Mussini , Li-Jun Zhang , Si-Cun Song , Ming Li , Ling Zhong , Feng Tang
{"title":"埃迪卡拉-寒武纪两种不同保存风格的带状大化石","authors":"Yu-Lan Li , Giovanni Mussini , Li-Jun Zhang , Si-Cun Song , Ming Li , Ling Zhong , Feng Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.jop.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fossil record of the latest Ediacaran and earliest Cambrian comprises diverse tubular and ribbon-like macrofossils of uncertain affinities, some of which could record early metazoans and macroalgae. This study compares two ribbon-like macrofossils typical of Ediacaran–Cambrian intervals, investigating their morphology, potential affinities, and biostratigraphic significance: <em>Rugosusivitta</em>, preserved as essentially two-dimensional carbonaceous compressions, and <em>Harlaniella,</em> preserved as casts and molds. It is shown that the recently described <em>Rugosusivitta orthogonia</em> Tang et al., 2021 resembles the tube-like <em>Harlaniella ingriana</em> in its morphology, characterized by a combination of transverse ridges and longitudinal stripes separated into distinct parts of an elongate body. This combination of features challenges algal or protistan affinities, leaving open the possibility of metazoan origins. Both <em>Rugosusivitta</em> and <em>Harlaniella</em> likely represent body fossils rather than ichnofossils consistent with their preservation as either carbonaceous compressions or sediment-infilled tubes, respectively. By reconstructing the global distribution of <em>Rugosusivitta</em> and <em>Harlaniella</em> in different taphonomic windows, we suggest that these fossils record a coherent morphotype spanning the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palaeogeography","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 651-663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two ribbon-like macrofossils in contrasting preservational styles from the Ediacaran–Cambrian interval\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Lan Li , Giovanni Mussini , Li-Jun Zhang , Si-Cun Song , Ming Li , Ling Zhong , Feng Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jop.2025.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The fossil record of the latest Ediacaran and earliest Cambrian comprises diverse tubular and ribbon-like macrofossils of uncertain affinities, some of which could record early metazoans and macroalgae. This study compares two ribbon-like macrofossils typical of Ediacaran–Cambrian intervals, investigating their morphology, potential affinities, and biostratigraphic significance: <em>Rugosusivitta</em>, preserved as essentially two-dimensional carbonaceous compressions, and <em>Harlaniella,</em> preserved as casts and molds. It is shown that the recently described <em>Rugosusivitta orthogonia</em> Tang et al., 2021 resembles the tube-like <em>Harlaniella ingriana</em> in its morphology, characterized by a combination of transverse ridges and longitudinal stripes separated into distinct parts of an elongate body. This combination of features challenges algal or protistan affinities, leaving open the possibility of metazoan origins. Both <em>Rugosusivitta</em> and <em>Harlaniella</em> likely represent body fossils rather than ichnofossils consistent with their preservation as either carbonaceous compressions or sediment-infilled tubes, respectively. By reconstructing the global distribution of <em>Rugosusivitta</em> and <em>Harlaniella</em> in different taphonomic windows, we suggest that these fossils record a coherent morphotype spanning the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palaeogeography\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 651-663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palaeogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383625000379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palaeogeography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383625000379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
埃迪卡拉纪晚期和寒武纪早期的化石记录包括多种管状和带状大型化石,亲缘关系不确定,其中一些可能记录了早期后生动物和大型藻类。本研究比较了埃迪卡拉-寒武纪两个典型的带状大化石,研究了它们的形态、潜在的亲缘关系和生物地层意义:Rugosusivitta,基本上作为二维碳质压缩物保存,Harlaniella,作为铸件和模具保存。研究表明,最近描述的Rugosusivitta orthogonia Tang et al., 2021在形态上类似于管状的Harlaniella ingriana,其特征是横向脊和纵向条纹的组合,这些条纹被分成细长身体的不同部分。这种特征的结合挑战了藻类或原生生物的亲和力,留下了后生动物起源的可能性。Rugosusivitta和Harlaniella都可能代表了身体化石而不是鱼化石,这与它们分别作为碳质压缩物或沉积物填充管的保存方式一致。通过对Rugosusivitta和Harlaniella在不同分类窗口的全球分布进行重建,我们认为这些化石记录了一个跨越埃迪卡拉-寒武纪边界的连贯形态型。
Two ribbon-like macrofossils in contrasting preservational styles from the Ediacaran–Cambrian interval
The fossil record of the latest Ediacaran and earliest Cambrian comprises diverse tubular and ribbon-like macrofossils of uncertain affinities, some of which could record early metazoans and macroalgae. This study compares two ribbon-like macrofossils typical of Ediacaran–Cambrian intervals, investigating their morphology, potential affinities, and biostratigraphic significance: Rugosusivitta, preserved as essentially two-dimensional carbonaceous compressions, and Harlaniella, preserved as casts and molds. It is shown that the recently described Rugosusivitta orthogonia Tang et al., 2021 resembles the tube-like Harlaniella ingriana in its morphology, characterized by a combination of transverse ridges and longitudinal stripes separated into distinct parts of an elongate body. This combination of features challenges algal or protistan affinities, leaving open the possibility of metazoan origins. Both Rugosusivitta and Harlaniella likely represent body fossils rather than ichnofossils consistent with their preservation as either carbonaceous compressions or sediment-infilled tubes, respectively. By reconstructing the global distribution of Rugosusivitta and Harlaniella in different taphonomic windows, we suggest that these fossils record a coherent morphotype spanning the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary.