有限训练点下VAS站土地覆盖分类不同算法的比较分析

IF 7.6 Q1 REMOTE SENSING
D. García-Rodríguez , A. Pérez-Hoyos , B. Martínez , Pablo Catret Ruber , J. Javier Samper-Zapater , E. López-Baeza , J.J. Martínez Durá
{"title":"有限训练点下VAS站土地覆盖分类不同算法的比较分析","authors":"D. García-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;A. Pérez-Hoyos ,&nbsp;B. Martínez ,&nbsp;Pablo Catret Ruber ,&nbsp;J. Javier Samper-Zapater ,&nbsp;E. López-Baeza ,&nbsp;J.J. Martínez Durá","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Valencian Anchor Station (VAS) (Spain) is an outstanding site operating as a central location for calibrating and validating numerous remote sensing instruments and products. Hence, an accurate characterization of its land cover is required. This research conducts a land cover classification within the VAS station (10 × 10 km<sup>2</sup>) and its surrounding area (30 × 30 km<sup>2</sup>) for 2021 using multi-temporal imagery from Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI). Several aspects of land cover classification have been evaluated, including <em>i)</em> the feature selection, <em>ii)</em> the temporal resolution of time series (i.e., monthly, seasonal), <em>iii)</em> the performance of six Machine Learning algorithms (i.e., CART, GTB, k-NN, NB, RF, and SVM, alongside three deep learning models (FC-NN, MLP-ED, and ResCNN) and <em>iv)</em> the optimization of classifier tuning parameters. Furthermore, the study assesses the impact of reducing sample sizes on classifying similar areas, extending the classification to three buffers (1 km, 5 km and 10 km) without increasing reference data. ResCNN emerged as the best-performing model, yielding superior classification metrics (96 % overall accuracy and 95 % kappa score) in July, coinciding with the peak vineyard phenology. Producer’s and user’s accuracy values generally exceeded 90 % for most land cover classes, with some exceptions in more challenging categories such as artificial surfaces and non-irrigated arable land, which showed lower accuracies due to inter-class similarity. Overall, the findings underscore the robust performance of all models in land cover classification, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving high-quality classification with a robust methodology and limited training data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104537"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of different algorithms for VAS station land cover classification with limited training points\",\"authors\":\"D. García-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;A. Pérez-Hoyos ,&nbsp;B. Martínez ,&nbsp;Pablo Catret Ruber ,&nbsp;J. Javier Samper-Zapater ,&nbsp;E. López-Baeza ,&nbsp;J.J. Martínez Durá\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Valencian Anchor Station (VAS) (Spain) is an outstanding site operating as a central location for calibrating and validating numerous remote sensing instruments and products. Hence, an accurate characterization of its land cover is required. This research conducts a land cover classification within the VAS station (10 × 10 km<sup>2</sup>) and its surrounding area (30 × 30 km<sup>2</sup>) for 2021 using multi-temporal imagery from Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI). Several aspects of land cover classification have been evaluated, including <em>i)</em> the feature selection, <em>ii)</em> the temporal resolution of time series (i.e., monthly, seasonal), <em>iii)</em> the performance of six Machine Learning algorithms (i.e., CART, GTB, k-NN, NB, RF, and SVM, alongside three deep learning models (FC-NN, MLP-ED, and ResCNN) and <em>iv)</em> the optimization of classifier tuning parameters. Furthermore, the study assesses the impact of reducing sample sizes on classifying similar areas, extending the classification to three buffers (1 km, 5 km and 10 km) without increasing reference data. ResCNN emerged as the best-performing model, yielding superior classification metrics (96 % overall accuracy and 95 % kappa score) in July, coinciding with the peak vineyard phenology. Producer’s and user’s accuracy values generally exceeded 90 % for most land cover classes, with some exceptions in more challenging categories such as artificial surfaces and non-irrigated arable land, which showed lower accuracies due to inter-class similarity. Overall, the findings underscore the robust performance of all models in land cover classification, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving high-quality classification with a robust methodology and limited training data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225001840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225001840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴伦西亚锚站(VAS)(西班牙)是一个杰出的站点,作为校准和验证众多遥感仪器和产品的中心位置。因此,需要对其土地覆盖进行准确的描述。本研究利用Sentinel-2多光谱仪(MSI)的多时相影像,对2021年VAS站内(10 × 10 km2)及其周边地区(30 × 30 km2)的土地覆盖进行分类。对土地覆盖分类的几个方面进行了评估,包括i)特征选择,ii)时间序列的时间分辨率(即每月,季节性),iii)六种机器学习算法(即CART, GTB, k-NN, NB, RF和SVM,以及三种深度学习模型(FC-NN, MLP-ED和ResCNN)的性能以及iv)分类器调优参数的优化。此外,在不增加参考数据的情况下,研究评估了减少样本量对相似区域分类的影响,将分类扩展到3个缓冲区(1 km, 5 km和10 km)。ResCNN是表现最好的模型,在7月份产生了优越的分类指标(96%的总体准确率和95%的kappa分数),与葡萄园的高峰物候相一致。对于大多数土地覆盖类别,生产者和用户的精度值通常超过90%,但在人工地表和非灌溉耕地等更具挑战性的类别中有一些例外,由于类别间的相似性,这些类别的精度较低。总体而言,研究结果强调了土地覆盖分类中所有模型的稳健性能,证明了利用稳健的方法和有限的训练数据实现高质量分类的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of different algorithms for VAS station land cover classification with limited training points
The Valencian Anchor Station (VAS) (Spain) is an outstanding site operating as a central location for calibrating and validating numerous remote sensing instruments and products. Hence, an accurate characterization of its land cover is required. This research conducts a land cover classification within the VAS station (10 × 10 km2) and its surrounding area (30 × 30 km2) for 2021 using multi-temporal imagery from Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI). Several aspects of land cover classification have been evaluated, including i) the feature selection, ii) the temporal resolution of time series (i.e., monthly, seasonal), iii) the performance of six Machine Learning algorithms (i.e., CART, GTB, k-NN, NB, RF, and SVM, alongside three deep learning models (FC-NN, MLP-ED, and ResCNN) and iv) the optimization of classifier tuning parameters. Furthermore, the study assesses the impact of reducing sample sizes on classifying similar areas, extending the classification to three buffers (1 km, 5 km and 10 km) without increasing reference data. ResCNN emerged as the best-performing model, yielding superior classification metrics (96 % overall accuracy and 95 % kappa score) in July, coinciding with the peak vineyard phenology. Producer’s and user’s accuracy values generally exceeded 90 % for most land cover classes, with some exceptions in more challenging categories such as artificial surfaces and non-irrigated arable land, which showed lower accuracies due to inter-class similarity. Overall, the findings underscore the robust performance of all models in land cover classification, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving high-quality classification with a robust methodology and limited training data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Earth-Surface Processes, Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信